于 2012-10-14 5:15, Dan Kenigsberg:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:38:19PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
After reading the code, every mailbox should be 4096 byte size.
And the total mailbox size is host * 4096. Ony one host is here, so
the total mailbox size here is 4096. why should the 'dd' operation
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:44:39PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
于 2012-10-14 5:15, Dan Kenigsberg:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:38:19PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
After reading the code, every mailbox should be 4096 byte size.
And the total mailbox size is host * 4096. Ony one host is here, so
the
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:38:19PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote:
After reading the code, every mailbox should be 4096 byte size.
And the total mailbox size is host * 4096. Ony one host is here, so
the total mailbox size here is 4096. why should the 'dd' operation
read 1024000 byte which is 1000K byte
After reading the code, every mailbox should be 4096 byte size.
And the total mailbox size is host * 4096. Ony one host is here, so
the total mailbox size here is 4096. why should the 'dd' operation
read 1024000 byte which is 1000K byte much lager than 4096 here?
2012-10-11 18:54, Dan
