- Original Message -
> From: "Zhou Zheng Sheng"
> To: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2013 11:25:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] starting up vdsm and svdsm
>
>
> on 01/06/2013 17:07, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
on 01/06/2013 17:07, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Zhou Zheng Sheng"
To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2013 11:03:59 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] starting up vdsm and svdsm
I think splitting VDSM and super VDSM into two services and delegate
ev
- Original Message -
> From: "Zhou Zheng Sheng"
> To: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2013 11:03:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] starting up vdsm and svdsm
> I think splitting VDSM and super VDSM into two services and delegate
> everything to systemd is simple an
on 01/04/2013 21:08, Royce Lv wrote:
I'm also agree with breaking these two as dependent services just as
vdsmd and libvirtd. These will involve supervdsm died
and vdsm reconnect, if we use key this will be security issue. So now
we use key as local variable.If just use child/parent
pipe, here
