- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Litke"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, "Vinzenz Feenstra"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 9:27:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] API Documentation & Since tag
>
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:45:45PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi w
- Original Message -
> From: "Ayal Baron"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> Cc: "engine-devel" , "VDSM Project Development"
> , "Deepak
> C Shetty"
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 6:23:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] RFC: New Storage API
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> >
> > -
Good to see my suggestion didn't fall on deaf ears.
- Original Message -
> From: "Zhou Zheng Sheng"
> To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> Cc: "VDSM Project Development" , "Adam
> Litke" , "Ayal Baron"
> , "Barak Azulay" , "Dan Kenigsberg"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 4:30:03 AM
> Subject: Re
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel P. Berrange"
> To: "Peter V. Saveliev"
> Cc: "VDSM Project Development"
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 5:35:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] libvirt interface usage improvements, #1
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:08:59PM +0100, Peter V. Saveliev wrot
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 05:08:59PM +0100, Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
> …
>
> Hello all.
>
> I'm working on improving libvirt usage in VDSM. Rationale is that
> libvirt driver has global lock, that holds us in any operation on
> many VMs simultaneously. Several small patches are prepared, so I'm
> s
…
Hello all.
I'm working on improving libvirt usage in VDSM. Rationale is that
libvirt driver has global lock, that holds us in any operation on many
VMs simultaneously. Several small patches are prepared, so I'm starting
to commit them.
The first one [1] removes UUIDString check in VM star
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 05:45:45PM -0500, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Adam Litke"
> > To: "Saggi Mizrahi"
> > Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, "Vinzenz Feenstra"
> >
> > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 5:21:41 PM
> > Subject: Re: [vdsm] API Document
Hi All,
I got this error, while trying to push a topic branch..but in the
end it looks like it did push the GLUSTERSD_DOMAIN patch ( which had a
minor change ). The other 2 patches didn't have any change. Finally when
i look up in gerrit, it shows GLUSTERSD_DOMAIn patch fine, but the link
on 01/08/2013 04:10, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
The solution is somewhat elegant (and only ~150 LOC).
That being said I still have some 2 major problems with it:
The simpler one is that it uses HTTP in a very non-standard manner, this
can be easily solved by using websockets[2]. This is very close
to
