Re: [vdsm] Dependencies for VDSM in the ppc64 platform
On 02/12/2014 12:13 PM, Vitor de Lima wrote: Hi, I have opened some bugs about VDSM dependencies that cannot be satisfied in the ppc64, these include newer versions of QEMU, libvirt and libguestfs. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063799 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057557 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064438 The first issue is the lack of a libguestfs package for Fedora Core 19 and 20, this is being worked on. Another issue is that in order to support the 3.4 cluster compatibility level, VDSM requires a newer version of libvirt than the one shipped with FC19, which cannot be found anywhere for ppc64. The final issue is a bug in QEMU 1.4.2 that prevents VMs created through libvirt from running, this was fixed in later versions but also there is not a package for FC19 that has this fix. So, what do you suggest? Should a virt-preview repo be created for ppc64? What about RHEL6? virt-preview would be an option, if I had ppc64 hardware to do the builds :) Or maybe these packages should be fixed and published as updates for the current releases of FC and RHEL? Our policy is not to rebase qemu or libvirt to a new version in stable fedora releases, since the risk of regressions is just too high. And generally there is a new fedora version every 6 months so telling people to wait for new features isn't typically a stretch. No idea about RHEL though. - Cole ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
Re: [vdsm] [fedora-virt] libvirt 0.10.0 dependency issue
On 09/09/2012 02:21 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 12:35:00PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:10:17PM +0800, Royce Lv wrote: Guys, Because vdsm is depend on a patch in libvirt 0.10.0, But libvirt 0.10.0 is not available for fc17. You can download the rpm here:http://libvirt.org/sources/ Other packages can be found with yum. Sorry for the inconvenience I've brought. Yeah, this unfortunate consequece was not foreseen by your reviewer. Shame on him. On the mean while, I've built libvirt-0.10.1-2 for my F16 (yes, I'm backward) and put it in http://danken.fedorapeople.org/f16/ I've moved it around under http://danken.fedorapeople.org/my-virt-preview, and added f17, but then realised, that we should better request whomever responsible on fedora-virt-preview to update libvirt under http://fedorapeople.org/groups/virt/virt-preview/ Would the owner be kind to do this? Whoops, my script was dead for a bit. Latest libvirt should be available there for now. - Cole ___ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
