Hi,
I finally have an update for the proposal ready, after some thinking and
throwing some ideas around with colleagues we came to the conclusion
that the best approach might be as followed (without having dynamic
return values)
I have set up some test engine with 'FakeVDSM' and I am
...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org,
Vinzenz Feenstra vfeen...@redhat.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 5:39:24 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [Engine-devel] Proposal VDSM = Engine Data
Statistics RetrievalOptimization
- Original Message -
I am completely
] Proposal VDSM = Engine Data
Statistics Retrieval Optimization
- Original Message -
I am completely against this.
It make the return value differ according to input which
is a big no no when talking about type safe APIs.
The only reason we have this problem
- Original Message -
On 03/13/2013 11:55 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
getVmRuntimeStats() - transient things like mem and cpu%
getVmInformation() - (semi)static
On 17/03/13 15:13, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/13/2013 11:55 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
getVmRuntimeStats() - transient things like mem and cpu%
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 3:13:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] Proposal VDSM = Engine Data Statistics
Retrieval
- Original Message -
On 17/03/13 15:13, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 03/13/2013 11:55 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
getVmRuntimeStats()
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
Cc: engine-de...@ovirt.org, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 3:13:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Engine-devel] [vdsm] Proposal VDSM =
I am completely against this.
It make the return value differ according to input which
is a big no no when talking about type safe APIs.
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
getVmRuntimeStats() - transient things
- Original Message -
I am completely against this.
It make the return value differ according to input which
is a big no no when talking about type safe APIs.
The only reason we have this problem is because there is this
thing against making multiple calls.
Just split it up.
VDSM = Engine Data Statistics
Retrieval Optimization
- Original Message -
I am completely against this.
It make the return value differ according to input which
is a big no no when talking about type safe APIs.
The only reason we have this problem is because
On 03/08/2013 03:30 AM, Mark Wu wrote:
On 03/08/2013 06:11 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
Please find the prettier version on the wiki:
http://www.ovirt.org/Proposal_VDSM_-_Engine_Data_Statistics_Retrieval
Proposal VDSM - Engine
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 09:37:03AM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
snip
Improvement of the Guest Agent:
As part of the proposed solution it is necessary to improve the
guest agent as well.
Improving the agent may be a good idea, but I do not see the necessity
in it.
The guest
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:21:27AM +0800, Mark Wu wrote:
On 03/07/2013 07:25 PM, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
Please find the prettier version on the wiki:
http://www.ovirt.org/Proposal_VDSM_-_Engine_Data_Statistics_Retrieval
Proposal VDSM - Engine Data Statistics Retrieval
VDSM =
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
Please find the prettier version on the wiki:
http://www.ovirt.org/Proposal_VDSM_-_Engine_Data_Statistics_Retrieval
Proposal VDSM - Engine Data Statistics Retrieval
VDSM = Engine data retrieval optimization
On 03/08/2013 06:11 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:25:54PM +0100, Vinzenz Feenstra wrote:
Please find the prettier version on the wiki:
http://www.ovirt.org/Proposal_VDSM_-_Engine_Data_Statistics_Retrieval
Proposal VDSM - Engine Data Statistics Retrieval
VDSM =
16 matches
Mail list logo
