On 08/31/2012 12:33 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
To: arch a...@ovirt.org, VDSM Project Development
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:19:46 AM
Subject: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
Hi
@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:23:38 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
On 08/31/2012 12:33 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
To: arch a...@ovirt.org, VDSM Project Development
vdsm-devel
12:36:10 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
On 08/31/2012 11:27 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
Cc: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com, arch
a...@ovirt.org, VDSM Project Development
vdsm
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:36:10 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
On 08/31/2012 11:27 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Alon Bar-Lev alo...@redhat.com
Cc: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com, arch
Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed around are UUIDs.
The point is that as long as you are not the entity generating the UUIDs the
fact that these are UUIDs have no real significance to you.
I suggest removing the validation of UUIDs from the receiving end. There is no
real reason to make
- Original Message -
From: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
To: arch a...@ovirt.org, VDSM Project Development
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 12:19:46 AM
Subject: [vdsm] [RFC] Implied UUIDs in API
Hi, in the API a lot of IDs get passed around
