Re: [vdsm] Installation dependency for VDSM-4.9.6-0.109 package on FC16

2012-04-23 Thread Federico Simoncelli
...@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 5:21:38 PM Subject: [vdsm] Installation dependency for VDSM-4.9.6-0.109 package on FC16 Hi, I am trying to upgrade my VDSM to the latest version. But it seems that several things

Re: [vdsm] Installation dependency for VDSM-4.9.6-0.109 package on FC16

2012-04-23 Thread Shu Ming
Yes, I tried these. It worked well except some gpg check errors which are harmless I think. On 2012-4-23 20:04, Federico Simoncelli wrote: Hi Shu, you can get sanlock and libvirt from fedora 17: # yum --releasever=17 update libvirt # yum --releasever=17 install sanlock And lvm2 from my

Re: [vdsm] Installation dependency for VDSM-4.9.6-0.109 package on FC16

2012-04-23 Thread Federico Simoncelli
, April 23, 2012 4:35:09 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] Installation dependency for VDSM-4.9.6-0.109 package on FC16 error, when I apply these updates on my laptop. here is the err: Retrieving key from file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-x86_64 The GPG keys listed for the Fedora 17

[vdsm] Installation dependency for VDSM-4.9.6-0.109 package on FC16

2012-04-22 Thread Shu Ming
Hi, I am trying to upgrade my VDSM to the latest version. But it seems that several things should be upgraded before the new version of VDSM can be installed on fc16. I am wondering if FC16 is the recommended system for this upgrade. Can anyone tell me if the newer version of