On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:14:16AM +0200, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 11/29/2011 11:36 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke
On 11/30/2011 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
https://github.com/aglitke/vdsm-rest/
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:13:24PM +0200, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
On 11/30/2011 11:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:54:44PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke (a...@us.ibm.com) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:39:08AM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Adam Litke
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 09:44:19AM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 11/30/2011 09:09 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 11/30/2011 05:00 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
single node and exposing the exact same REST API and behavior of the
multi-node ovirt engine would be easier to cosnume for someone that
* Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
I don't think this is mutually exclusive with having AMQP used for comms
between VDSM ovirt-engine. One possible implementation strategy would
be to have a 'vdsm-qmf' agent running on the node which talks REST to
VDSM and translate it to QMF
We had a very useful discussion on IRC regarding these ideas. Here is that
transcript for those of you who are interested:
danken aglitke: I have, thanks to Chris Write
danken I know I should chime in, as well as smizrahi I suppose.
aglitke yep... Would be good to get some additional
