On 18/01/12 12:44, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 07:46:17PM +0200, Livnat Peer wrote: >> On 17/01/12 16:08, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: >>> On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 03:08:13PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: >>>> Hi Lists, >>>> >>>> One cannot create a PV on a partitioned device, and therefor such >>>> devices where not reported to Engine. This proved surprising to users >>>> who woder where their LUN disappeared. >>>> >>>> Vdsm should report all devices, and ovirt-engine should mark partitioned >>>> devices as unworthy of a PV. In the future, Vdsm may allow to forcefully >>>> remove a partition table from a device, to make it usable as a PV. >>>> >>>> Douglas (CCed) would take resposibilty on the Vdsm side. Initial patch at >>>> http://gerrit.ovirt.org/944 sports a backword-compatible API. Who's taking >>>> this >>>> on Engine? This involves GUI, too, as partitioned devices should probably >>>> be >>>> displayed greyed-out. >>> >>> Livnat, is there any taker for this on your side? >>> >>> Since the change is backward-compatible, I would push it if there are no >>> objections. >>> >>> Dan. >> >> Hi Danken, >> >> How did you mark a partitioned device? (How will the engine will spot >> these LUNs) > > Each device has a field 'partitioned'. Currently, Engine ignores it (as it is > always False). With my little patch, devices with partitioned=True would be > reported, too. > > Dan.
ok great thanks. you can push it and will take care of the engine side. Thanks, Livnat _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
