Re: [vdsm] [Users] Is this "dd" operation harmful?

2012-10-14 Thread Shu Ming
于 2012-10-14 5:15, Dan Kenigsberg: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:38:19PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote: >> After reading the code, every mailbox should be 4096 byte size. >> And the total mailbox size is host * 4096. Ony one host is here, so >> the total mailbox size here is 4096. why should the 'dd' operat

Re: [vdsm] [Users] Is this "dd" operation harmful?

2012-10-14 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:44:39PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote: > 于 2012-10-14 5:15, Dan Kenigsberg: > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:38:19PM +0800, Shu Ming wrote: > >> After reading the code, every mailbox should be 4096 byte size. > >> And the total mailbox size is host * 4096. Ony one host is here, so