On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:18:02PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: > On 01/17/2013 04:15 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20:12PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: > >>i tried running nightly engine (well, since 3.2 beta repo still > >>contains an old version). > >>from beta repo i got this vdsm version: > >>vdsm-4.10.3-4.fc18.x86_64 > >> > >>it doesn't contain latest getHardwareInfo which engine expects[1] > >>i enabled the nightly repo, expecting a newer vdsm, but nightly has > >>vdsm versions of vdsm-4.10.3-0.87 > >> > >>I assume -4 in beta isn't getting replaced by -0.87? > > > >Indeed. Nightlies are build from master branch. ovirt-3.2 would be built > >from ovirt-3.2 branch. > > then shouldn't master move to a newer version (3.3 for engine soon, > 4.11 for vdsm?)
We'd move to 4.11 when we have something substantial - such as basic amqp binding. 4.10.3 was a special bump for ovirt-3.2. Too bad that it takes us so long to stabilize ovirt-3.2 and that another bump may be required to avoid condusion. > > > > >> > >>so which vdsm version are we using for 3.2 beta? > >> > >>[1]2013-01-17 15:15:53,222 ERROR > >>[org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VdsBrokerCommand] > >>(QuartzScheduler_Worker-65) XML RPC error in command > >>GetHardwareInfoVDS ( HostName = > >>local_host ), the error was: > >>java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: > >>java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException, <type > >>'exceptions.Exception'>:method "getVdsHardwareInfo" is > >>not supported > > > >getVdsHardwareInfo (http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9258/) has not been > >backported to the ovirt-3.2 branch; I do not see that it has even been > >proposed. I suppose Yaniv (or someone) should do it. > > > >We still do not have a sane build for ovirt-3.2. On top of > >getVdsHardwareInfo we have > > bz 886087 Rest query add storage domain fails on fedora18: missing > > /sbin/scsi_id > >and http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/10758/ (udev: Race fix- load and trigger > >dev rule) that blocks block storage. > > > >I told Douglas today that before these are fixed, there is no hurry for > >another build. > > agree, but in general we need this build is we were supposed to have > had the beta build by now... Douglas has built vdsm-4.10.3-5.fc18 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=379346 with fixes that SHOULD make ovirt-3.2 work with NFS. I'd appreciate any attempt to test All-in-One and ovirt-node registration with it. Dan. _______________________________________________ vdsm-devel mailing list vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/vdsm-devel
