On 02/19/2012 05:32 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
FlowID does absolutely nothing towards that end. What is required for that
(and should indeed be done) is work on improving the existing logs:
1. reduce verbosity
2. make sure that required points in the flow are logged
3. improve log messages
Don't
...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2012 11:07:34 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
- Original Message -
From: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
To: Simon Grinberg si...@redhat.com
Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, Dan Yasny
dya...@redhat.com, Ayal Baron aba
Grinberg si...@redhat.com, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 4:01:01 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
To: Dan Yasny dya...@redhat.com
Cc: Simon Grinberg si...@redhat.com,
vdsm-devel
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:06:46PM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
On 02/13/2012 02:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
is that it (ab)uses an http header for carrying FlowID,
Yes, it certainly does appear to overload it. I would be nice to
have
something
- Original Message -
On 02/12/2012 02:50 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
-1
I agree that for messaging environment having a Message ID is a
must
because you sometimes don't have a
- Original Message -
From: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
To: Ayal Baron aba...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Monday, 13 February, 2012 6:55:41 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
On 02/13/2012 02:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote
On 02/13/2012 12:52 AM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
if the FlowID isn't logged for logs which are part of the action, it
will be easy to detect the entry point.
but still wouldn't make it easy to grep all related logs to a flow
If the flow id is present in all lines it would make the log a lot
- Original Message -
On 02/13/2012 02:28 PM, Ayal Baron wrote:
...
is that it (ab)uses an http header for carrying FlowID,
Yes, it certainly does appear to overload it. I would be nice to
have
something formal given to it by engine, but I can appreciate the
difficulty
On 02/12/2012 09:50 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
-1
I agree that for messaging environment having a Message ID is a must
because you sometimes don't have a particular target so when you get
a response you
- Original Message -
On 02/12/2012 09:50 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
-1
I agree that for messaging environment having a Message ID is a
must
because you sometimes don't have a
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:23:19PM -0500, Ayal Baron wrote:
- Original Message -
-1
I agree that for messaging environment having a Message ID is a must
because you sometimes don't have a particular target so when you get
a response you need to know what this node is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2012 05:18 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
The question is, what problem is this really trying to solve and is
there a simpler and less obtrusive solution to that problem?
correlating logs between ovirt engine and potentially multiple vdsm
. I
see it doing more harm the good by reinforcing bad debugging practices.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Robertson krobe...@redhat.com
To: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 1:34:43 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
: Thursday, February 9, 2012 1:34:43 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
On 02/09/2012 12:18 PM, Andrew Cathrow wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ayal Baronaba...@redhat.com
To: Dan Kenigsbergdan...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project
Developmentvdsm-devel
From: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
To: Keith Robertson krobe...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 2:24:44 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
-1
I agree that for messaging environment having a Message ID
- Original Message -
From: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com
To: Keith Robertson krobe...@redhat.com
Cc: VDSM Project Development vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2012 2:24:44 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] flowID schema
-1
I agree
On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:00:44AM -0500, Douglas Landgraf wrote:
Hello,
flowID is schema that we will be including in vdsm API to oVirt
Engine people share the ID of engine transaction to vdsm.
With this in hands, we will add the ID of transactions to our log.
I would like to know
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012 12:00:44 AM
Subject: [vdsm] flowID schema
Hello,
flowID is schema that we will be including in vdsm API to oVirt
Engine people share the ID of engine transaction to vdsm.
With this in hands, we will add the ID of transactions to our log.
I would
Hello,
flowID is schema that we will be including in vdsm API to oVirt
Engine people share the ID of engine transaction to vdsm.
With this in hands, we will add the ID of transactions to our log.
I would like to know your opinion how we could do that without break our
API, like include
19 matches
Mail list logo