Re: [vdsm] upstream/downstream compat

2012-04-23 Thread Ryan Harper
* Dan Kenigsberg [2012-04-21 15:38]: > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 07:25:24AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > > * Dan Kenigsberg [2012-04-09 04:21]: > > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:58:09AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > > > > I've submitted some changes to start some of the work of removing the > > > > RHE

Re: [vdsm] upstream/downstream compat

2012-04-21 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 07:25:24AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > * Dan Kenigsberg [2012-04-09 04:21]: > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:58:09AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > > > I've submitted some changes to start some of the work of removing the > > > RHEV/RHEVM names throughout the vdsm code. In one

Re: [vdsm] upstream/downstream compat

2012-04-09 Thread Ryan Harper
* Dan Kenigsberg [2012-04-09 04:21]: > On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:58:09AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > > I've submitted some changes to start some of the work of removing the > > RHEV/RHEVM names throughout the vdsm code. In one of the patches, > > there's a good discussion on compatibility with d

Re: [vdsm] upstream/downstream compat

2012-04-09 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:58:09AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote: > I've submitted some changes to start some of the work of removing the > RHEV/RHEVM names throughout the vdsm code. In one of the patches, > there's a good discussion on compatibility with downstream[1] > And I wanted to continue that o

[vdsm] upstream/downstream compat

2012-04-06 Thread Ryan Harper
I've submitted some changes to start some of the work of removing the RHEV/RHEVM names throughout the vdsm code. In one of the patches, there's a good discussion on compatibility with downstream[1] And I wanted to continue that on the mailing list so we could have more eyes; it's not clear to me i