Re: [vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2?

2013-01-23 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
- Original Message - From: Douglas Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com To: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com Cc: Ofer Schreiber oschr...@redhat.com, vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:49:15 PM Subject: Re: [vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2? Hi

Re: [vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2?

2013-01-23 Thread Mike Burns
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 08:49 -0500, Douglas Landgraf wrote: Hi, On 01/19/2013 02:08 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:18:02PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: On 01/17/2013 04:15 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20:12PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: i tried

[vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2?

2013-01-17 Thread Itamar Heim
i tried running nightly engine (well, since 3.2 beta repo still contains an old version). from beta repo i got this vdsm version: vdsm-4.10.3-4.fc18.x86_64 it doesn't contain latest getHardwareInfo which engine expects[1] i enabled the nightly repo, expecting a newer vdsm, but nightly has vdsm

Re: [vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2?

2013-01-17 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
enabled the nightly repo, expecting a newer vdsm, but nightly has vdsm versions of vdsm-4.10.3-0.87 I assume -4 in beta isn't getting replaced by -0.87? Indeed. Nightlies are build from master branch. ovirt-3.2 would be built from ovirt-3.2 branch. so which vdsm version are we using for 3.2 beta

Re: [vdsm] which vdsm version for 3.2?

2013-01-17 Thread Itamar Heim
On 01/17/2013 04:15 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20:12PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote: i tried running nightly engine (well, since 3.2 beta repo still contains an old version). from beta repo i got this vdsm version: vdsm-4.10.3-4.fc18.x86_64 it doesn't contain latest