Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed next-generation vdsm API

2011-12-03 Thread Ayal Baron
- Original Message - > * Geert Jansen [2011-11-30 17:38]: > > Hi, > > > > i think this makes sense, but i'm not a VDSM expert. I did want to > > point > > out one other point, below: > > > > On 11/30/2011 11:40 PM, Adam Litke wrote: > > > Recently we've had some very productive discuss

Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed next-generation vdsm API

2011-12-02 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 12/01/2011 12:42 PM, Geert Jansen wrote: > > On 12/01/2011 07:35 PM, Adam Litke wrote: > >> A single-node (or standalone VDSM deployment) is a very important use case. >> Many people are coming into the oVirt community from different perspectives. >> The strength of the ecosystem depends, in par

Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed next-generation vdsm API

2011-12-01 Thread Ryan Harper
* Geert Jansen [2011-11-30 17:38]: > Hi, > > i think this makes sense, but i'm not a VDSM expert. I did want to point > out one other point, below: > > On 11/30/2011 11:40 PM, Adam Litke wrote: > > Recently we've had some very productive discussions concerning the VDSM > > API. I > > want to

Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed next-generation vdsm API

2011-12-01 Thread Saggi Mizrahi
On 12/01/2011 01:42 PM, Geert Jansen wrote: > > On 12/01/2011 07:35 PM, Adam Litke wrote: > >> A single-node (or standalone VDSM deployment) is a very important use >> case. >> Many people are coming into the oVirt community from different >> perspectives. >> The strength of the ecosystem depends

Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed next-generation vdsm API

2011-12-01 Thread Geert Jansen
On 12/01/2011 07:35 PM, Adam Litke wrote: > A single-node (or standalone VDSM deployment) is a very important use case. > Many people are coming into the oVirt community from different perspectives. > The strength of the ecosystem depends, in part, on the ability of oVirt > components to be combi

Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed next-generation vdsm API

2011-12-01 Thread Adam Litke
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:37:00AM +0100, Geert Jansen wrote: > Hi, > > i think this makes sense, but i'm not a VDSM expert. I did want to > point out one other point, below: > > On 11/30/2011 11:40 PM, Adam Litke wrote: > >Recently we've had some very productive discussions concerning the VDSM A

Re: [Engine-devel] Proposed next-generation vdsm API

2011-11-30 Thread Geert Jansen
Hi, i think this makes sense, but i'm not a VDSM expert. I did want to point out one other point, below: On 11/30/2011 11:40 PM, Adam Litke wrote: > Recently we've had some very productive discussions concerning the VDSM API. > I > want to attempt to refocus the discussion around an emerging p