21.10.2012 09:23, Dan Kenigsberg kirjoitti:
skip /
We should decide NOW on the format of the capabilities «bag», and never
change it. Testing for a capability is much more reliable than checking
a version, and remembering which version had which capability.
Dan.
Ok, so what will we decide?
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 02:26:44PM +0200, Peter V. Saveliev wrote:
21.10.2012 09:23, Dan Kenigsberg kirjoitti:
skip /
We should decide NOW on the format of the capabilities «bag», and never
change it. Testing for a capability is much more reliable than checking
a version, and remembering
-
From: Vinzenz Feenstra vfeen...@redhat.com
To: Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com
Cc: Saggi Mizrahi smizr...@redhat.com, Michal Skrivanek
mskri...@redhat.com,
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:15:47 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] new API verb: getVersionInfo()
On 10/18/2012 08
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:07:43AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
Thanks for posting your idea on the list here. I like the idea of a more
fine-grained version query API. getVdsCapabilities has become too much of a
catch-all and I agree that something lighter is useful. I do think vdsm will
want
dan...@redhat.com
To: Adam Litke a...@us.ibm.com
Cc: vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, Michal Skrivanek
mskri...@redhat.com
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 4:38:16 AM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] new API verb: getVersionInfo()
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:07:43AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
Thanks
On 10/18/2012 06:03 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
currently getVdsCaps() does a lot of unrelated things most of them have no
relation to capabilites.
This was done because of HTTP overhead. Instead of calling multiple commands we
will call one that does everything.
I agree with the suggestion that
On 10/18/2012 08:34 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 10/18/2012 06:03 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
currently getVdsCaps() does a lot of unrelated things most of them
have no relation to capabilites.
This was done because of HTTP overhead. Instead of calling multiple
commands we will call one that does
mskri...@redhat.com,
vdsm-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:15:47 PM
Subject: Re: [vdsm] new API verb: getVersionInfo()
On 10/18/2012 08:34 PM, Itamar Heim wrote:
On 10/18/2012 06:03 PM, Saggi Mizrahi wrote:
currently getVdsCaps() does a lot of unrelated things
18.10.2012 18:03, Saggi Mizrahi kirjoitti:
currently getVdsCaps() does a lot of unrelated things most of them have no
relation to capabilites.
This was done because of HTTP overhead. Instead of calling multiple commands
we will call one that does everything.
skip /
Can I please make a small
…
Just to be clear: yes, I think, that getVdsCapabilities() can and should
be optimized, but as well it has quite different meaning for different
purposes.
And what about capabilities «bag» — its format also can be a subject of
a change (e.g. long int bitmask ⇒ list of literals), but the version
10 matches
Mail list logo
