We have a master server that connects to a SL500 robot. The drives in
the SL500 library are all directly conencted to a Netapp. We have been
using this to backup the netapp over NDMP. So far so good. Can this
setup be extended to backup widows clients? We are running version 6
of NBU. We want to av
In case you missed it
In-Depth Troubleshooting Guide for Exit Status Code 41
in NetBackup Server (tm) / NetBackup Enterprise Server (tm) 6.0
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/278422.htm
Karl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/25/2006
01:50:40 PM:
> We're in the process of moving from our 4.5FP8
You don't mention the server platform, but we've been warned (and found)
that our Solaris servers need to be up to date on Kernel patches to avoid
problems, just going to 5.1. I realise 6.0 is very different, but I
suggest that at least if you use Solaris it is likely to still be true.
William
We're in the process of moving from our 4.5FP8 system to 6.0MP1
(everythin new). The major problem we're seeing, are ERROR 41's as
we start "loading up" the media servers. These would occur in
batches and appear on the more heavily loaded media server.
Any 6.0 environments out there experiencing t
Indeed in our test lab I've used the Qlogic card with the QLogic driver,
which is what ADIC recommend. No issues at all but I don't have enough
hardware to test SSO intensively.The latest Qlogic driver is
dynamically reconfigurable - it says - as long as you use their tools to
do so, and a
Not bad for starters but my company enviroment is rather small (1
Master/media and about 10 clients).
I have also setup NOM and have setup reports and notifications.
Anyone else implemented NOM?
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Hi.
I have also upgraded to 6.0 . I think that if you don't have the Vault
Licence it wont go up. Not sure though...
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Parnell, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 6:32 PM
To: veritas-bu@mail
Hi.
When you add a tape, it will appear in the in the vmquery output, but not in
the bpmedialist command output.
It will appear in the bpmedialist command output when it has been used in a
succesfull backup.
The vmquery -deassignbyid command is VERY bad way to go. It will cause major
mismatches
Sun really seems to be dragging their feet when it comes to support for
any FC tape. We started with FC tape with SGI servers over 4 years
ago. No problem. Same thing for HP-UX. We also had a couple of Sun
420R boxes with Sun/qlogic HBAs which refused to recognize the STK
drives we had. Th
All,
Has anyone already upgraded its NetBackup solution from 5.1 MP3 to 6.0 MP1 ?
My customer environment is composed of Windows 2003 servers, Exchange
clusters, SQL and Notes databases.
Veritas Security Services are also implemented on the master server.
Any feedback will be appreciated.
Best
Hi there,
I have just recently upgraded from Netbackup Enterprise version 5.1MP3
to 6.0MP1
After the upgrade that went without a hitch the Netbackup Vault Manager
Service refuses to start up. I am not using vault and do not have a
licence for it but the service is listed and will not start! It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
That would be the Advanced Client with the Off Host Backups. A separately
licensed
item.
Thanks
Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
Xinupro, LLC
617-834-2352
Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) wrote:
>
> We just upgraded out SAN Solution to something with 80TB
Yes, though there is almost nothing you can tune. Search on the internet
for the document entitled "San Foundation Suite Tunables".
We have also found that our library vendor does not actually support using
the qlc driver with their libraries, as it does not comply with the
fibre-channel stand
Title: Message
We just upgraded out SAN Solution to something with 80TB or
similar, and the possibility now exists of using our Hitachi AMS500 to run
shadow copies, hot copies or whatever you would like to call it.
Unfortunately, it would be a major pain in the rear to have to manually hav
I would recommend that 2Gb is probably not a large enough fragment size, as
that's barely
long enough for the drive to get up to speed. Figure 70MB/sec transfer rate
(optimally),
and your drive is stopping every 4 minutes (roughly). Add multi-plexing and that
could be even more often, not to men
The problem that the original poster was/is having, is that the media in
question exists in the volume database on the master server, but not in
any media database. This means, that unless his scratch pool is MISPD,
this tape will never be utilized in its current state, since it is
marked "assi
Hello
Look at the Veritas-Document #262724 (How to optimally
performance-tune systems with IBM Linear Tape-Open 2 drives)
Notice: You must have enough physical und shared memory on
your system.
And your question: We use the follow fragmentsize (2000
MB)
Marco Casoli IT-Systemspezialist St
Tried the vmquery and here is what I got
vmquery -m dou079
Could not query by media ID DOU079: volume does not exist in database
(35)
-Original Message-
From: Spearman, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 07:58
To: Barber, Layne (Contractor); Robert Nusser;
I had the same thing happen and got a solution from Veritas (excuse me,
symantec). It is drastic but it does work. You need to know the tape ID
and the pool number.
install_path\volmgr\bin\vmquery.exe -deassignbyid
0 (that's a zero, use on a tape that is NOT a catalog)
install_path\volmgr\bin
I have a similar situation. I have a tape that shows up in the media
list in the gui, but I can't delete it or anything. I get the message
that the volume is not in the NB database.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Nusser
Sent: Wedne
Any recommendations
for the fragment size when using LTO2 drives? Any other tuning tips for a 5.1
setup using LTO2.
Title: Message
I've been looking
for some performance tuning infolike tuning the HBAs block transmit to match
the drives, etc, etc
Can't seem to find
anything.worse case, I can go to Sun
Paul
Hi all,
I am having problems with some of my media id's not appearing in the "NB media
database". I have attempted bplabeling the tape again, and then assigning it
with vmquery -assignbyid. Alas it seems I am back where I started and I can
see the tape using vmquery, but I cannot see the tape usin
Hi all,
Thanks for all answers i
got. Now I have something to think about…
MVH / Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 - 401 99 43
Tel mob: +46 (0)70 - 217 92 66
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTE
24 matches
Mail list logo
