Thanks,
Figured that out, and that's what I ended up doing.
I know that any full job in a given policy should write to a certain
volume pool, and I know the time preiod I'm looking for, so I made a
bidlist using bpimagelist for all full backups from the subset of
policies I need to duplicate that
Title: bpclntcmd
Does anyone have any idea why:
Bpclntcmd hn master_server_name (works)
Bpclntcmd ip master_server_ip_address (works)
But
Bpclntcmd pn (doesnt work)
This is driving me crazy. Naturally the backups fail.
Regards,
Patrick Whelan
NetBackup Specialist
Architect
On what OS are you installing? NT Terminal server or Win2000 TS? From what
I recall when installing on NT TS, you have to run a command to set the
server in install mode. I don't know if this is also the case on a W2k TS.
Regards,
Jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that our issue does lie with the driver on each individual platform.
We think the IBM atdd driver will work for HP and seems to be supported by
Veritas, but it is not supported for the Sun platform. What I would like to
know from anyone using Solaris 9 media servers with IBM LTO2
Title: Restricted Java Access
Tammy,
We use auth.conf exclusively and there is not a way to give
read only access..it only gives you the ability, like you said, to restrict to
different areas. If you want read only, I would suggest something like Aptare
monitoring software which has
Tristan,
I have talked to several consultants and they said they have never gotten a
rename to work in version 6.0. Their best bet was to rename the 5.x server
then migrate...and even that was difficult. We tried to rename our master
server when we went to 5.x and never did get it to work.
Title: bpclntcmd
I've had issues here where a backup will start, mount a
tape but never write anything, eventually failing with an error 47 I
think. It was all due to a reverse DNS record for the IP not matching
up. Assuming windows here try ping -a SERVER IP and see what you
get. It should
Hi all,
What is best practice with regards to Volume Pools ?
We are thinking of using a single Volume Pool for all of our data tapes.
Is it good practice to use the Netbackup Volume pool for this situation ?
-aW
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
FWIW, in NBU 6 hot catalogue backups are the recommended way to go and a
pool called CatalogBackup gets created especially for that purpose. We
therefore just use NetBackup for the normal data tapes and it is fed
from a scratch pool.
Since we use the vault option we also have a VaultCatalogue and
Alex
Each to their own at the end of the day. What I have done in the past and
present is:
1) Netbackup Pool is for the netbackup catalog tapes (currently 2 live in
there).
2) Each Policy has its own Volume Pool
3) Easier to manage tapes (ie: Only tapes in a specified pool will contain
data for
10 matches
Mail list logo
