[Veritas-bu] Error Status 29: Failed to exec a command

2006-07-05 Thread DLew97
Hi - My Oracle DB backup jobs have been completing withan Error Status 29: Failed to exec a command. When I check the logs on the server, the jobs are completed but in the Netbackup Console I get this error - the db's jobs are successful. Here is a bphdb log: 16:00:41.048 [4616.4388] 2

[Veritas-bu] Questions regarding Single drive backup

2006-07-05 Thread krish . subramanian
Hi. I have installed a new NB 5.0 server with a single tape drive. I am able to see the drive through NB. Also, i am able to configure a sample backup and run successfully. However, i am able to take any more backups on the tape, actually the tape is not mounting on the drive. In the activity

Re: [Veritas-bu] license question re NDMP backup

2006-07-05 Thread Marcos DeLima
Hello, I´m new in the block. Regarding your problem I do have the same scenario as you. The trick is to add NDMPlicense on your NetBackup (BP) server. It should solve the problem. In the veritas support webpage look for Veritas Netbackup 4.5for NDMP. I know you might have a newer version of BP

Re: [Veritas-bu] Questions regarding Single drive backup

2006-07-05 Thread Peter DrakeUnderkoffler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You should read the Media Manager manual available either with you software or on line and then post questions after that. Single drive and tape stacker configurations are well documented. Peter DrakeUnderkoffler Xinupro, LLC 617-834-2352 [EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] Questions regarding Single drive backup

2006-07-05 Thread Martin, Jonathan \(Contractor\)
I have this issue occasionally... Most often you need to re-mount the tape. You can also check your master server properties and make sure that backups can write different retentions on the same tape (if this is the issue.) Also, I would turn on the option to not allow backups to span

Re: [Veritas-bu] Questions regarding Single drive backup

2006-07-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Kirshan Best place to start is verifying the tape is in or known by Netbackup :-) Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Questions regarding Single drive backup

2006-07-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Peter I am sure the originator was looking for suggestions on helping solve the issue, rather than reading the manuals, which we all know does not cover every single problem associated with single drive backups! Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain Administrator EADS

Re: [Veritas-bu] license question re NDMP backup

2006-07-05 Thread william . d . brown
My understanding is that the very latest DataONTAP (7.1.1) and NetBackup 6 versions have finally addressed the problem of sharing the drive. However I also thought I read that with NetBackup 6 the drive if on the server no longer needs to be dedicated to NDMP anyhow - what was broken was the

[Veritas-bu] Error (89) under Linux and Netbackup 6.0MP3 (shared memory)

2006-07-05 Thread Justin Piszcz
1: (89) problems encountered during setup of shared memory Anyone ever get this error on Linux? I have 6 media servers or so in an environment, each hold two tape drives, two of the 6 media servers also control the robot. On one media server, I consistently get this error for any jobs that get

[Veritas-bu] Alfred MAK is on leave

2006-07-05 Thread Alfred KY MAK
I will be out of the office starting 07/05/2006 and will not return until 07/06/2006. I will respond to your message when I return. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Error (89) under Linux and Netbackup 6.0MP3 (shared memory)

2006-07-05 Thread Justin Piszcz
I have 6 media servers or so in an environment, each hold two tape drives, two of the 6 media servers also control the robot(s). Two robotic control hosts, only this one is having a problem. On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Justin Piszcz wrote: 1: (89) problems encountered during setup of shared memory

[Veritas-bu] NBU 4.5 Unix HPUX

2006-07-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Hi Not familiar with Unix, but got a Robotic Library that recently had 2 new tape drives installed and I configured using the NBU Device Wizard. NBU sees the devices all ok - set the storage unit for 2 drives and kicked off a full backup. Enabled BPTM Logging. I keep getting

Re: [Veritas-bu] How can I report on how many tapes are filled pe r day?

2006-07-05 Thread WEAVER, Simon
Title: Message Doesnt the Media List Report indicate the tape is full? Regards Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows Domain Administrator EADS Astrium Limited, B32AA IM (DCS)Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Patricia

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 4.5 Unix HPUX

2006-07-05 Thread Jeff Lightner
Title: Message Just putting the drives in wouldnt make them available to the OS (HP-UX). You can cheat and simply reboot the HP-UX host or you can do insf e to make it install the devices. ioscan fn will show you the hardware your HP-UX sees. Make sure the drives dont show as UNCLAIMED

[Veritas-bu] Backup Windows 2003 server in another domain

2006-07-05 Thread Coen, Trevor
Title: Backup Windows 2003 server in another domain Hi, What do I need to have in place to backup a Windows 2003 server that is not in the same Windows domain as the Netbackup 5.1 MP3 Master Server? Thanks, Regards Trevor Coen The contents of this e-mail are confidential to the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Windows 2003 server in another domain

2006-07-05 Thread ckstehman
It should work as long as they are on the same internal network and DNS is configured for forward and reverse lookups And, you can ping the client from the master and media servers, and client to master and media and there are no firewalls between them = Carl Stehman

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Windows 2003 server in another domain

2006-07-05 Thread Ed Wilts
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 05:32:50PM +0100, Coen, Trevor wrote: What do I need to have in place to backup a Windows 2003 server that is not in the same Windows domain as the Netbackup 5.1 MP3 Master Server? NetBackup doesn't care about Windows domains - it cares about DNS. Put the proper name

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available

2006-07-05 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
I will load it immediately to all my customers that running NetBackup 6. I have stopped upgrading my customers from NetBackup 5 when I understand that Symantec make a mistake and realize a virus with the name NetBackup 6 stefanos From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available

2006-07-05 Thread Stefanos Monovasios
ALSO Imagine that the 6.0 MP2 was 62MB and 6.0MP3 is 170MB stefanos From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefanos Monovasios Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 11:44 PM To: 'Dhotre, Shekhar'; 'Johnny Oestergaard'; 'Ian'; 'veritas-mail-list' Subject: Re:

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.0 MP3 available

2006-07-05 Thread Jeff Lightner
Thats because all their binaries have a new system call that executes a shell routine: if ! $0 then exit 0 # Dont let the user know it really failed fi J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefanos Monovasios Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000

Re: [Veritas-bu] How can I report on how many tapes are filled pe r day?

2006-07-05 Thread Patricia Harmon
Title: Message I can get information in a script using both of the commands below, butI was hoping for one command to give me the tapes I used and whether it got full. /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bpimagelist -media -U -hoursago 72 gives me the tapes used

Re: [Veritas-bu] Inconsistencies with some open file issues?

2006-07-05 Thread Wilkinson, Tim
Title: Message The plot thickens a bit here. We had to have a whole building power outage so had to bring everything down. When we brought it back up there were a few issues (no policies or settings were actually changed to my knowledge) but were fixed but strangely this inconsistency has