At one time I used cumulative inc. for just about everything; however,
then the realization that is was eating up tape galore.
Would cum.incr. be more advantageous for certain situations.
I was thinking in one case a database system called DOORS. It generates
thousands of small files changing
Title: Message
Hi All,
I have a big question about the catalog
included in netbackup servers.
Inmy environment, there is one
solaris 9 master and media server, there is one solaris 9 media server, and one
windows 2003 media server.I am
preparing the procedure in case one of media server
James C Siano wrote:
Would cum.incr. be more advantageous for certain situations.
Or where
else would it be best used overall from those on the list using that
formula?
CumInc is used when you want to minimize the tape mounts for a restore and
also to minimize the risk of data loss in case
Some NetBackup admins that use diffInc will throw in a CumInc in the middle of the week. "Ed Wilts" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/17/2006 7:43 AM
James C Siano wrote: Would cum.incr. be more advantageous for certain situations. Or where else would it be best used overall from those on the list using that
Title: Database backup restarts
We have a problem whereas if a database (Sybase) job is spawned using the standard netbackup script and half way through the backup (maybe 25 out of 50 databases) the parent job failes, Netbackup restarts the parent job and ALL databases attempt to backup all
Keep alive are packets that are sent on idle connection to ensure the connection is still active / valid. If the keep alive fails its often because the connection itself has been severed (broken TCP connection) This can also happen if the target machine is working on something and does not have
You didn't specify the release. Assuming pre-NetBackup 6.0 cold catalog
backups here.
1. Is All catalog information which I need to restore/backup
contained in the master server.
Restore, yes.
I mean if one media server has gone, does the
information in master server contains the
See in-line
On 8/17/06, Asiye Yiğit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have a big question about the catalog included in netbackup servers. Inmy environment, there is one solaris 9 master and media server, there is one solaris 9 media server, and one windows 2003 media server.
I am preparing
So I've got about 6 machines, all MS-Windows at a remote site connected
by 1000Mb/s ethernet over DWDM/Fiber.
It seems on a nightly basis, it rotates, which of thes machines hang.
The behaviour looks like the stereotypical NIC duplux mismatch, but
that's been verified, and is not the caseno
Has there been any word on an MP4 release?
-Rusty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 6:33 PM
To: 'Brooks, Jason'; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0 MP3 Scheduler
Is the master a Windows machine as well? If its Unix/Linux you can
download and install tcpdump which will let you specify interface and IP
you wish to monitor. You can use ethereal to look at the packets
captured by tcpdump.
Not sure if there's a Windoze equivalent or version of those tools.
I'm starting to get the impression that in 6 NBU = No BackUps and MP =
Mangled Patch. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Major,
Rusty
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:32 AM
To: Ed Wilts; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re:
We're going to
upgrade very soon to 5.1 MPx. Is there a patch that's better than the others?
We're upgrading to make best use of disk storage units and also to prepare for
the move to 6.0 at some point.
Thanks,
Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP
Data Assurance Engineer
(281) 584-4693
VeriCenter,
MP4 seems to be safe in a LARGE environment for us :)
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Major, Rusty wrote:
We're going to upgrade very soon to 5.1 MPx. Is there a patch that's
better than the others? We're upgrading to make best use of disk storage
units and also to prepare for the move to 6.0 at some
Did you do run insf -e ?
-Shyam
On 8/17/06, Covington, Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are trying to connect a HPUX server to our McData switch so that the HPUX can be zoned to 'see' the SSO tape drives also attached to this switch. We should be able to see 6 Ultrium Lt02 drives in an
We recently applied MP5. No problems so far.
-Shyam
On 8/17/06, Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MP4 seems to be safe in a LARGE environment for us :)On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, Major, Rusty wrote:
We're going to upgrade very soon to 5.1 MPx. Is there a patch that's better than the others? We're
It's a solaris master.
We've got a mucho-dinero full-duplex GigE sniffer / network
analyzerwhich is where this data came from.ie. Hardware based
pay-to-play verson of tcpdump+ethereal.
Now on to trying to interpret the data from it.
--
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Lightner
The recommendation from the tech support guy dealing with the job
manager crashing is to go back to MP2 and see if JM is still as flaky.
I never observed the same behavior with MP2 that I've seen with MP3.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Thanks to all,
I'm new to netbackup and thats a terrible goof up. Many of the gurus
out here have shown me where I err'ed. The concept is clear to me know
But I'm still surprised as to why the first working day backup is
approx 74 GB when the full backup on SUN is 120 GB.
Well I'm planning to
Title: Informix 7.31 logical logs and Netbackup 6.0 performance issues
All,
I'm having problems quickly backing up logical logs for an informix 7.31 database using Netbackup 6.0 MP2.
Each Informix Server (there are many of them.) has a 550 meg staging disk that the logical logs back up
Jeff:
Well done! I am laughing so hard I am crying. Thanks for the levity.
Since we went to 6 it has been an uphill climb.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Lightner
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:26 AM
To: Major, Rusty; Ed
Don't go there - if you can. Get your logging up a bit (3-5). Submit
your logs and ask for the newest iteration of nbpem and nbjm. They have
been working on those binaries to prepare for MP4 (as I understand
things).
Good luck,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sept 15! Focus on nbpem, nbjm, and hot catalog backups.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Major,
Rusty
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 9:32 AM
To: Ed Wilts; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0 MP3
Title: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.0 MP3 Scheduler Problems?
If they can get it to work, great! I'll definitely wait a bit on this one. I'm working over trying to get a BMR case resolved so I can downgrade to MP2, per the tech support.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Jorgensen, BillSent: Thu
Within the log, each line contains 2
sets of digits (the '[3456.3432]' part shown below) in brackets separated
by a dot, but have been unable to determine exactly what each side of the
digit set represent. I have noticed that the 1st digit set appears
to correspond to job and/or process ids, but
We also ran into sched problems with nbu 6.0, not as bad Ed. But most of them
have been fixed with MP3 and the post MP3 patches.
We have three systems using netbackup 6. One is very small and only saw one
sched error with a 200 error code. The second system is medium sized and we saw
a little
Jorgensen, Bill wrote:
Sept 15! Focus on nbpem, nbjm, and hot catalog backups.
We've got recent nbpem and nbjm images and it's still broken. They're
working on the issues but they're not quite there yet...
.../Ed
Ed Wilts
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mounds View, MN 55112
Not sure what LARGE is defined
as, but MP4 works ok after 7 engineering binaries from Symantec. All
but one made it's way into MP5...
Is there really such a thing as best
patch? (Seems like an oxymoron to me) :)
Christopher D. Adkisson
Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL
28 matches
Mail list logo
