BE will be simpler - is the little brother to the big brother of NBU.
Also, what version is it and what is your Windows version. An out of date BE
may not be compatible with some of the features of your Windows OS :-)
HTH
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain
Title: Message
Thanks Simon
Yeah, tpautoconf -t results in the required
info.
Cheers
Dave
From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 15 September 2006
06:36To: Clooney, David;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Media
server migration
Hi Dave
Points
Hi experts,
a customer of mine is unsing NetBackup 6.0 on a Windows 2003 platform
as it's central backup/recovery infrastructure. A FC attached library
with 3x LTO3 drives is used for storing the data. For better backup/restore
performance, a disk staging area is used!
Unfortunately, the
Mirko
Ok, well maybe we can compare things here, because I have been using DSU's
to an HP EVA over fiber, and to be truthful, the throughput is pants !!! In
fact, writing to LTO3 is BETTER than disk.
I do think that writing to disks has been a poor experience for me, and its
something I may not
Title: Message
Thanks Simon I will try that, all the logging levels are
default I suppose?
From: WEAVER, Simon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 15,
2006 7:46 AMTo: Edwin Bader; Martin, Jonathan (Contractor);
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: RE: [Veritas-bu]
Ok 4.5 for windows is fine.
You can check the system requirments for BE on the symantec.com web site :-)
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Message
I
am not sure if you can change them - try the command with a /? for Windows
users
It may or may not help - just an alternative that activity monitor
and the reports module :-)
Regards
Simon Weaver3rd Line Technical SupportWindows
Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium
On 9/15/2006 2:55 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a customer of mine is unsing NetBackup 6.0 on a Windows 2003 platform
as it's central backup/recovery infrastructure. A FC attached library
with 3x LTO3 drives is used for storing the data. For better backup/restore
performance, a disk staging
Hello Don
Check the bprd log to see what name/ip the server is logging in to the backup
server with. You may need to raise the verbose level to 5 to get the wanted
information.
You will proably need to stop/start netbackup on the backup server, if you
didn't already.
Regards
Michael
On Thu,
Title: Message
What you need to do is
bperror -problems -client $client -d mm/dd/ (start
time ) -e mm/dd/ (end time) -U
Start and end time being either side of when the backup
took place .
If there was an error code 1 (partial sucess) then
netbackup will have a record of it is is
Are you restoring from another server? Do you have
/usr/openv/netbackup/db/altnames set up properly, see manual for the way
that is right for your implementation?
Regards,
Patrick Whelan
NetBackup Specialist
Architect Engineering
+44 20 7863 5243
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the
Ed
Can I ask a question?
What sort of files are backed up? Large or a lot of small files?
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original
I like the look of the ProtecTIER product.
However, I've come up with some information that I can't get a hard
answer on.
The info I got from Diligent coonfused me even more.
Everything I can find, and am told by either HDS, or Diligent says that
Protectier requires FC disk...as in, not
* smpt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-15 07:05]:
Hi,
I've configured some firewaled NetBackup domains with vnetd and I never had
any problem with streams.
I have ages to hear from someone the port model. I had proposed this to some
of my customers and when the firewall admin understood how
That's correct, from what I understand.
As you are backing up the exchange instance, that is one Exchange
License.
However, you are still backing up two Windows Clients (the two
physical nodes) so you need regular client licenses for each of those.
Paul
--
-Original Message-
From:
Hi,
ProtecTier on work over FC protocol but I have never heard that it require
FC disk... When I meet with diligent people from Israel, I told them that we
already have 7 TB of SATA that we which to re-use, that would be no
problem, they said.
They only support FC arrays today, but in that array
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jeff Lightner
Step by step notes I wrote when I did this:
FYI the following is what I did in NetBackup for backing up
client in the firewall.
Open Netbackup Java GUI
Go to
My info has come from three sources:
A) a question posed to the contact us link at diligent.com
B) the Diligent regional Rep for Canada
C) the rep from HDS.
The Rep from HDS agrees with me, that it doesn't make sense.
FC connectivity is sorta obvious...
Paul
--
-Original Message-
We were looking at an offsite backup solution w/ Diligent here and everyone we
talked to (Local Reseller, Diligent Sales Technical resources) said our HDS
AMS500 w/ SATA Shelves would be fine. In the end we balked at the Diligent
Protectier software cost and went another way but cost aside
Interesting.
I think you were mentioning a while back, that you only intend to keep
data on disk for as long as it takes to get it staged off to tape?
In that case, yeah, the cost of ProtectTIER is certainly steep, but if
you intend to keep data around on disk for more than a couple weeks, the
Keep in mind that number and size of files is irrelevant to the tape
drive speed.
It only affects how fast the client can collect the data, form a stream
and send it to the network stack.
You can run bpbkar32 on the client
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/242918.htm
And see how fast the
Please post the iptables information. We are adding Linux to our environment
and that information would help.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Lightner
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 7:47 AM
To:
/sigh
Don't try and figure it out. It took me 5 weeks to meet all of
Management's demands, and I'm still confused. =P
Basically, IF we went w/ Protectier we would have put it in our DR
Building (a significant ways away from our Data Center, connected via
fiber) and would have only had to write
As I said it worked for me doing the reread. The documentation says you
have to restart the daemons so I noted it as such. I didn't try without
the reread so it might have worked as you say.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Keating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 15,
This is on RHEL 4:
To add permission to iptables on client:
Verify iptables is running with iptables .L and that its last entry is to
block icmp. (If not running iptables .L will only show about 3 lines.)
1) iptables -D RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited
###
I have a script that runs bprdreq -rereadconfig 50 times (50 is
completely arbitrary) and so far it has worked every time.
Regards,
Patrick Whelan
NetBackup Specialist
Architect Engineering
+44 20 7863 5243
Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most! - Unknown
There are only 10
I feel your pain.
:o\
Paul
--
-Original Message-
From: Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: September 15, 2006 9:54 AM
To: Paul Keating; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] problems with VTL StorageTek solution ?
and my
* Whelan, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-15 15:34]:
I have a script that runs bprdreq -rereadconfig 50 times (50 is
completely arbitrary) and so far it has worked every time.
I have never had a problem with on-the-fly changes for vnetd. You can
also use the CLI to make these changes a LOT
Title: Message
The
Problem
Dell PE servers running RH3 with emulex
9000 fibre channel cards connected to Clariion disk space. When running a BMR to
a stand alone system everything works as advertised. However if the system has
an Emulex 9000 card in it the BMR job would always fail since
I just fixed the same problem here.
As it turns out, the problem we had was that we had Xeon processors
in our x64 system. These where not supported until 5.1 MP 4. I
had to uninstall all patches, and the 5.1 GA client, then install the client
again using the winnt.x64.exe file for MP 4. Since
Hi,
Here in Sweden Diligent is pretty cheap I think, or at least at the same
level as other vendors. But of course management people can twist things the
other way...
Did you go with another VTL/de-dup solution instead?
Hampus Lind
Rikspolisstyrelsen
National Police Board
Tel dir: +46 (0)8 -
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I apologize for top-posting, but this web client really sucketh...
Bah, I'm a top-posting vigilante, even though I come from a usenet
background.
;o)
You'll note in my posting that I am having performance
I'm still using NB 5.1, but I assume these settings are still valid in
6. Have you tried creating/adjusting the parameters (adjust for Windows
paths):
../netbackup/db/config/SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS_DISK
../netbackup/db/config/NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS_DISK
If I recall, the staging process still requires
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Daniel Cox
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 12:51 PM
To: Paul Keating; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO3 performance
I'm still using NB 5.1, but I assume these
Well, I found the problem. First, support was incorrect; plain barcodes
work. I remember when I imported the tapes, something about setting the
number of cleanings. When I looked, all the tapes were 0. I set one up
with valid cleanings, which I believe them to have, and it worked. As
for the
Simon,
thanks for your answer! I've checked all the client setting and they
seem to be ok,
no AV and nothing... Anyway: The strange point is, that if we're
storing a Master Server's
local volume to tape, it gives us about 40Mb/s to a single LTO3,
storing the DSU results
in 'bout 20Mb/s...
Hi all,
I'm not the expert in Windows backups, so allow me to ask a -
hopefully - simple
question:
Are there any major differences using VSS vs. using VSP? Only a
matter of Windows
OS level?
... besides this, I wonder in what situations it makes sense to use
(whichever) snapshot...
any
Hi all,
a customer of mine is getting the following error message in a
restore situation:
Error bptm(pid=3904) error requesting media, TpErrno = Robot
operation failed
NetBackup is running Windows using version 6.0 using a Sun/StorageTek
L700 library.
The customer did not mention any NBU
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
a customer of mine is getting the following error message in a
restore situation:
Error bptm(pid=3904) error requesting media, TpErrno = Robot
operation failed
NetBackup is running Windows using version 6.0 using a Sun/StorageTek
39 matches
Mail list logo
