Re: [Veritas-bu] ALTPATH Method

Hi Anas Well for Windows, there is no file extension. Just a file called ALTPATH. Here is a suggestive use for it... http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/269996.htm http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/269996.htm HTH Regards Simon Weaver 3rd Line Technical Support Windows Domain

[Veritas-bu] No proxy found

Hi All, Anyone get this message on their console of the master server ? Apr 16 17:32:11 server name last message repeated 18 times Apr 16 17:32:13 server name VERITAS: No proxy found. And a solution to fix it ? Thanks, Dominik This email (including any attachments) may

Re: [Veritas-bu] No proxy found

0n Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:35:38PM +1000, Dominik Pietrzykowski wrote: Apr 16 17:32:11 server name last message repeated 18 times Apr 16 17:32:13 server name VERITAS: No proxy found. And a solution to fix it ? Safe to ignore. [http://support.veritas.com/docs/280746] -aW

[Veritas-bu] Include list for NDMP

Our master is set a Solaris 8 V880 with NB 5.1 MP6. Our NDMP hardware is : $ /usr/local/bin/sudo /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/set_ndmp_attr -verify Password: Verify Host name: X Connecting to host X as user ndmp... Waiting for connect notification message... Opening session--attempting with

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5.1 on Solaris 10

I recently added a Solaris 10 media server/robot host to our existing Solaris 9 master medias environment. If I recall, didn't really have any problems. NBU 5.1 MP6. Not SSO (though we use SSO on the other media servers). You may need to run /usr/sbin/inetconv to convert the /etc/services

Re: [Veritas-bu] Include list for NDMP

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bobby Williams Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:22 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Include list for NDMP Our

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 5.1MP5 to 6.0MP4 problems

I installed directly nb6-MP4 over nb5.1-MP5, its the new release available for download from fileconnect. Wessam Aly From: Len Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 16 April, 2007 03:47 To: Wessam Aly; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: RE:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Include list for NDMP

Good Morning, We are not using NDMP, with the EMC box, but I believe that the answer will be the same. The main thing to remember about ndmp backups is that a netbackup client is not doing the backup. The EMC box is doing the backup. So you have to look at the rules that the EMC box

Re: [Veritas-bu] Include list for NDMP

Len Boyle wrote: Good Morning, We are not using NDMP, with the EMC box, but I believe that the answer will be the same. The main thing to remember about ndmp backups is that a netbackup client is not doing the backup. The EMC box is doing the backup. So you have to look at the

[Veritas-bu] NDMP job stopping on locked tape with error 84

I was running an NDMP job this weekend that ran over one tape. The job attempted to write to another tape that happened to be write protected. At that point, the job failed with an error 84 and restarted. I had plenty of other tapes in the robot. Is this normal behavior? Doesn't netbackup

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup upgrade 5.1MP5 to 6.0MP4 problems

I don't know obout Solaris but in Windows you need to run nbpushdata to move your data to the new database format from 5.x to 6.x, It was iin the upgrade procedures for upgrading from nb 5x to nb 6x Doug Preston Systems Engineer Land America Tax and Flood Services Phone 626-339-5221 Ext 104

[Veritas-bu] Access NOM 6.0 Database

All, I'm trying to come up with a way to access the NOM 6.0 MP4 database via query so I can setup my own reporting. Unfortunately NOM's reporting is pretty sad, or as the Symantec support guy said not very deep. I inquired about a live way to access the SQL data, but got told by support:

[Veritas-bu] Drive cleaning

I know the recommended way is to have the library do hardware based cleaning when it needs it, but I also know that netbackup can clean the drives as well. What are the pros and cons to having netbackup do the drive cleanings? I am seeing allot of alerts in our logs about no cleaning tape

Re: [Veritas-bu] kernel parameters for NetBackup 5.1 MP5 on solaris 10

I know this is not a SUN forum, but IMHO /etc/system was much easier to manage. SUN has made this more complicated, tuning and services are 2 new things in Solaris 10, that I hate. (till i learn these) MK --- Asiye Yiðit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As you know, in solaris 10, lots of

[Veritas-bu] Include list for NDMP

Include lists for NDMP backups cannot contain wild cards at all. Please see the NetBackup 5.1 for NDMP System Administrator's Guide page 33-34 the files section. Thank you Mike Heck ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

[Veritas-bu] MSSQL Agent Restores

We are thinking of getting the NB 6.0 MSSQL agent. Can you restore all the MSSQL DB's without SQL running? Or does MSSQL have to be running with master.mdf Thanks Karl___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 5.1 on Solaris 10

Hi Folks, As I already said, I had to follow the guide where it says, how manually to create sg devices and the actual sg.conf file including the tape drives or targets/luns. That one was apparently missing in my case. Here are the actual steps, if somebody needs them: 1) Install NetBackup 5.1

[Veritas-bu] Reporting scripts

Greetings, I know things like this have been discussed but I haven't found a way to get what I want from the command line. It looks like I need a little bit of output from bpdbjobs -all_columns, using the lastbackup column definition in the bp.conf file, and part of the bpcatlist command. I

[Veritas-bu] SAN split

Hey guys I have a problem where a SAN split that keeps going from active to re-queueing in the Activity Monitor. The drives needed for the backup mounted fine on the server but because of the unusual activity I attempted to cancel the jobs but that did not work. I even cancelled the split and