Re: [Veritas-bu] Reporting Tool for NetBackup

2007-08-16 Thread Kevin Whittaker
Tape Drive Usage Media History Media Usage by application Impact on missing a backup Showing everything separated by type - i.e. Backup, Restore, Vault Needs to be SSO aware. Able to consolidate and keep separate multiple master servers and their media servers. NetBackup 5.1 MP6 - going to

[Veritas-bu] MP5: Cannot decompress .Z file...

2007-08-16 Thread prodsacnetworking
Hi, I have NB 6 MP5. it got rid of the problems I had with MP4 but now it give me the following every second: Thu Aug 16 08:40:13 EDT 2007mps7Error 0 General cannot decompress /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images/mpn1/118600/NT_MTL_1186459054_INCR.f.Z any ideas?

Re: [Veritas-bu] MP5: Cannot decompress .Z file...

2007-08-16 Thread Patrick
Have you tried decompressing it manually? If nothing else it might give you an idea as to why it can't be decompressed. It might work and stop the message. :) Regards,   Patrick Whelan VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From:

Re: [Veritas-bu] full backup not working...

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
That isn't by any chance the same image that's not decompressing is it? Oh man, that would suck big time. Did you do complete backup and restore tests after upgrading to MP5? -Jonathan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of prodsacnetworking

[Veritas-bu] Re: MP5: Cannot decompress .Z file...

2007-08-16 Thread prodsacnetworking
Yes, it has 51G on 63G. [quote=BeDour, Wayne]Pretty basic but easy to forget, have you checked to see if your filesystem has enough free space to do the uncompress? Wayne BeDour IT Unix System Administrator PH: 313-240-3374 FAX: 313-240-3065 Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]

[Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Kevin Whittaker
All, Netbackup 5.1MP6 Ok, I am going to try and not sound too stupid about this. I am new to backing up VMWARE and a little confused. We have a Windows 2003 , running VMWARE Workstation 5. Well, we loaded NetBackup client on the 2 VMWARE clients, also running Windows 2003, and they both

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.0 MP5 on Win2K3x64 client

2007-08-16 Thread Mike Kiles
I have disabled open files backup. Thx --- Tharp, Trey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're using 6.0MP4 currently with no issues. And are you using VSP or VSS for open file backups? We've had the best success with VSS on our 64-bit clients. I would try changing the OFO to VSS if you haven't

[Veritas-bu] Re: full backup not working...

2007-08-16 Thread prodsacnetworking
Ok, yes. I tried it with all my servers and it gives me in the java console: Thu Aug 16 11:28:50 EDT 2007mps7Error 0 General cannot decompress /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images/mpn6/118600/MPN6_1186808402_FULL.f.Z humm.. permission problems? bash-2.05# ls -lah

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
I'm not sure what the core is, but if you are backing up the disk files or data that resides on the master / host then you have to specify that host name in the policy. If you want data on the virtual disks (not the virtual disks themselves) then you have to install the NBU client on the virtual

[Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a Separate Master

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
Windows 2003 NBU 6.0 MP4 I'm trying to restore data to a remote master server of data that was backed up here. My plan is to take a backup, fedex the media to the remote site and copy the image files to the site into the images folder. I'm testing this now, and I can see the server in the backup

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Kevin Whittaker
No That is not it. I am backing up the virtual clients just fine, using standard NetBackup procedures. I want to backup the actual servers C drive, not one of the VMWARE client's. I believe I am just using the wrong terminology. It is not even getting connected, because it keeps

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Kevin Whittaker
Sorry about not understanding VMWARE. Rumba is the actual real server name. Rumba3 is virtual machine 1 Fiesta is virtual machine 2. Rumba3 and Fiesta backup just fine. Rumba gets the status code 58 24. From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
Ok... so Host_1 -- Virtual Machine 1 Host_1 -- Virtual Machine 2 Host_1 -- Virtual Machine 3 Verify that Host_1 (in my example above) is in DNS and make sure you specify host_1 in your policy with the C:. I'd also make sure you exclude the directories with your virtual machines in them.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a Separate Master

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
Whoops - forgot to set the failover restore server. Now I'm getting - requested media id was not found in the EMM database Will a phase 1 import of the media take care of this? -Jonathan -Original Message- From: Martin, Jonathan Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:27 AM To:

[Veritas-bu] (no subject)

2007-08-16 Thread ramaswamy savi
Hi Friends I am trying to generate a reports via command in netbackup, I have serveral commands like bperror, bpimagelist, bpimmedi etc. But i dont find any output which gives both start end date and time. either one exist in the output. Pls suggest me is there any other

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a Separate Master

2007-08-16 Thread Daniel Teklu
The proper way to do this is importing the media on the master server you are doing the restore at. -Daniel -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:27 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] full backup not working...

2007-08-16 Thread Preston, Douglas L
Look at the file size of all your fulls in the listing, It looks like the only ones that actually have data are the vms fulls If you try to manually tar -xvzf /usr/openv/netbackup/db/images/mpn6/118600/MPN6_1186808402_FULL.f.Z Does it also fail? You should get some sort of error doing it

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
No - I think he is saying he has no issues backing up the virtual machines on top of vmware. What he wants to do is backup the underlying real machine so he can restore vmware itself. (i.e. Backup what would be there if there were no virtual machines setup yet.) In that case there is no C

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Kevin Whittaker
Yes, I am trying to backup the underlying real machine. This is VMWARE workstation 5, which is a Windows 2003 OS, not redhat. At least that is what I was told by the VMWARE guy. I logged onto rumba real machine using remote desktop. Does that make any sense?

Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a Separate Master

2007-08-16 Thread rcarlisle
It should Reneé Carlisle ServerWare Corporation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:41 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Restoring Data to a

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Kevin Whittaker
This is not a ESX Server, I am being told it is only VMWARE Workstation. From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:15 PM To: Jeff Lightner Cc: Martin, Jonathan; Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject:

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
Well I'm not a vmware expert (or even user) but my understanding was vmware itself was a base Linux OS. The only one we have here is vmware esx and it is certainly a base Linux OS. When you remote into rumba are you seeing standard Windows Start etc...?

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Cruice, Daniel \(US - Glen Mills\)
6.5 does have a LINUX client... Thanks Dan From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:15 PM To: Jeff Lightner Cc: Martin, Jonathan; Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Jeff Lightner
6.0 (and 5.1 and probably earlier) have Linux clients but they're aimed at RedHat Linux rather than the Vmware Linux. One *might* be able to force the RH one to run on Vmware but it would likely take some work and would be unsupported. From: Cruice,

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Steven L. Sesar
I don't believe that any NBU client exists that has hooks into vmfs. This would be a requirement of any backup agent for ESX. One *could* quiesce the vmfs filesystem and take a standard filesystem backup of the .vmdk files, but that would require downtime on all guest hosts running on a given

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
There is no ESX client per say, but in 6.0 Veritas did have a Linux client, I think it was 2.4, you need to ensure that you can ping your master server from that ESX host, you may need to add in the master's server name and IP address in a host file on that ESX server if you can't ping it from the

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Richard . Mickle
Kevin, First off, I am assuming you are running VMWARE Workstation 5.X which, as far as I know only runs on Windows systems. (There may be a Linux version that I do not know about.) That said. Are you able to do nslookups from the client (read Rumba) to the NetBackup server by IP address

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Steven L. Sesar
There's no ESX server client - that said, I don't know about 6.5 or what Symantec's road map might include in the VMWare space. VI3 does come with a solution, VCB (VMWare Consolidated Backup). That's probably what he should be using to protect his ESX boxes. In a DR scenario, an ESX server

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Chacko, Savil
The 5.1 redhat client will definitely work on an ESX box, and in conjunction with the vmbk.pl script located below you can backup your vmdk files hot. I don't know about 6.x though, but should be the same case. http://www.vmts.net/vmbk.htm http://www.vmts.net/vmbk.htm -Savil

[Veritas-bu] Re: full backup not working...

2007-08-16 Thread prodsacnetworking
Me neither I don't know any system with Full smaller.. ;-) I did ran tar: tar: tape blocksize error is there a command to reindex everything? Presently in the tape library, I have my Incrementals tapes and my Local-FULL... Thanks, MArc [quote=Preston, Douglas L]Look at the file size of

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question - 6.5 Good News - Off Topic

2007-08-16 Thread Scott Jacobson
Not specific to addressing Kevin's original question .. VMware at present doesn't have any intention in allowing you to backup a guest's vmdk file without the use of it's Windows Proxy server (yes you could manually script around it with what is now automatically the function of a their

[Veritas-bu] Re: full backup not working...

2007-08-16 Thread prodsacnetworking
Ok, I contacted my Support Contract Company... it seems it's a problem with MP5 when you use the compressed catalog images... Man.. frankly.. is it possible to have a NBU version that works??? +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] (no subject)

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
bpdbjobs will give you backup job start and end times. -Jonathan From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ramaswamy savi Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:47 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] (no subject) Hi

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
Whoa - TIME OUT - This is being blown WAY outta scope. The original email said this was VMWARE WORKSTATION... its is available for Windows and Linux but he said he was running WINDOWS 2003! There is most definitely an agent for Windows 2003. VMWare Workstation is a standard application running

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Martin, Jonathan
They are called persistent routes. If you just ROUTE ADD it goes away after you reboot. ROUTE -P ADD 10.1.1.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.254 Is this Windows 2003 or Windows 2000? Windows 2000 responds to the network interface the request came from despite the routing. Windows 2003 acts more

Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question

2007-08-16 Thread Kevin Whittaker
Yes... it looks like it was the DNS setup was wrong on the server?!?! I am not a Windows guy, so I did not see that issue. The Windows guys fixed it and the backup is running right now. whew! I let the VMWARE thing throw me, should have went with my gut about it. Now I have to deal with the

[Veritas-bu] VMD and LDAP

2007-08-16 Thread Brooks, Jason
It's come to my attention that my Linux NBU Media Server is knocking on doors it shouldn't. So, I've been digging. What I've found is an ESTABLISHED connection to our AD LDAP by vmd. My question is why? Why would the Volume Manager Daemon 'talk' to an LDAP? Our Linux boxes use AD

[Veritas-bu] Re: full backup not working...

2007-08-16 Thread prodsacnetworking
I'm posting the french response of the support: He says Symantec knows about it...(it seems to be frequent that they know.. and launch it anyways.. (mp4 too)... and I need to reinstall the mp4... because the work around of uncompressing does'nt work.. 3: Non, mes nous attendons patiemment des

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup 6.0 MP5 on Win2K3x64 client

2007-08-16 Thread Mike Kiles
When you select the client type in the policy do you select PC-X64, Windows Server 2003 or PC, Windows Server 2003 I read in the documentation to use PC-X64, Windows Server 2003 but i dont see it my drop down list when adding the client to a policy. Thx --- Tharp, Trey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-16 Thread Tristan . Ball
I know, it's only just been released, and after the-hell-that-was-6.0, I'm thinking most folks are going to wait a long while. But on the other hand, we don't currently have BMR licensed, and the fact that it's included in 6.5 is very attractive... Actually, just getting all the old advanced

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - Anyone actually using it?

2007-08-16 Thread Major, Rusty
In my opinion, 6.5 isn't going to be near as painful as 6.0 is/was. 6.5 isn't an entire re-write of the code like 6.0 was. I still think the old addage of wait for the first MP is probably a good idea, though =). -Rusty From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL