,
name=c-4090293236-20070911-08, parms=
ORA-27027: sbtremove2 returned error
ORA-19511: Error received from media manager layer, error text:
Failed to remove, c-4090293236-20070911-08, from image catalog.
Recovery Manager complete.
From the dbclient log:
09:03:27.409 [5732.6496] 16 VxBSAQueryObject
Well if you willing to spare a lot of time with veritas support, to have
VxSS working properly, then install it. My experience with this product is
tragic. Even if you manage to pen the console, some commands doesn't work
This is my opinion.
_
From: Curtis Preston [mailto:[EMAIL
Hello there!
How do I check the activity of a user using JAVA GUI Console?
Somebody using JAVA Console cancelled all my Jobs ang nobody from the list of
users admitted.
Please post here suggested methods in tracking Netbackup User activties.
Thank you!
Jon
Environment: NBU 5.1 with MP5 on
Symantec Support in Australia are the best than in the US
They have the best attitude and service.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NB 6.0 MP4 upgraded to NB6.5 on Windows 2003 server. After the upgrade, BMR
boot server service won't start. Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks.
Simrat
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Just a silly question.
Have you upgrade the ΒΜΡ boot server also?
---Original Message---
From: Sekhon Simrat S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 - BMR boot server service failing
Sent: Sep 11 '07 14:24
NB 6.0 MP4 upgraded to NB6.5 on Windows 2003 server.
A reinstall seemed to fix the situation.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Patrick
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 12:41 PM
To: Brooks, Jason; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re:
Elaborate?
IP/ethernet attached, like a NAS?
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: September 10, 2007 5:17 PM
To: Curtis Preston
Cc: Kevin Whittaker; Forester,Jack L;
VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://www.coraid.com/ has 10Gbps 24 drive AoE boxes that appear to be
well priced.
Justin.
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Paul Keating wrote:
Elaborate?
IP/ethernet attached, like a NAS?
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Justin Piszcz
Recently we have found that for some reason the DSSU policy takes a long time
to finish. The tape drive mounts the volume but sits there for 5 hours before
it actually starts. I have spoken to the guys at Symantec and they say it is
due to large images being staged. I had a look at the images
Hello everyone
This is my first post. Please be gentle with me.
I have s server running as master and media server. It have Win2003 with
NetBackup 6.0mp5 attached to two disk cabinets, and a TLD HP ML6000 with 4 LTO2
drives.
I now want to move the NetBackup installation to a new and better
dgrabs03 wrote:
Symantec Support in Australia are the best than in the US
They have the best attitude and service.
I agree. There have been times that I have a problem I have waited until
the Aussies were working to call my problem.
The version of MS SharePoint is 2007
Jason Leidy
Con-way Enterprise Services
Windows Server Group
503-450-3958
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leidy,
Jason D
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 7:40 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:
Follow-up
A few hours after I posted this I got a call from someone who works in
Symantec Tech Support QA who is trying to revamp their support.
Apparently my little rant got passed around. I explained a few issues
I've had and he seemed very receptive.
1) I explained that there is nothing
Yes, there is a Netbackup Sharepoint agent you have to purchase
separately similar to exchange and sql. It backups up the entire
sharepoint site and database. If you are running 2007 I'd checkout the
compatibility with NBU 5.1.
-Jonathan
From: [EMAIL
According to the compatibility guide (264318), SharePoint Server 2003
is supported via the SQL server agent. See 264854 for more details.
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/264318.htm
http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/264854.htm
On 9/11/07, Leidy, Jason D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The
Tim your idea worked. I was able to load a tape and move it from one drive to
the next drive using a combination of tldtest commands and mt to offline the
tape. I think tldtest may support offlining the tapes as well but I have not
tested this feature.
The syntax is as you described--use
After consulting the:
Veritas NetBackup (tm) Enterprise Server / NetBackup Server 5.x Database
Agent Compatibility (Updated April 2, 2007)
http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise
_Server/264318.pdf
I'd say manual backups or an upgrade to NBU 6 are in your
That being said, if you have a large SP deployment, site restores will
take quite a long time. You *can* script something on the SP side using
stsadmin to export the sites to .DAT files, then use a filesystem
backup to grab them. Otherwise, you're going to need to restore the
entire database, then
Is there no way to backup internally to disk, rather than purchase an
agent and upgrade?
Not knowing Sharepoint that well, one would think there is an ability to
perform certain backups and restores.
Maybe a search on google ?
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows
Quick search I done, may or may not help...
http://www.spsfaq.com/backup.asp?page=2
http://www.spsfaq.com/backup.asp?page=2
Only thinking was performing file level backup to disk, which you can write
to tape.
Just a thought
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows
I've noticed lately that when we perform our test restores, they
frequently complete with a status 1 (Partially successful) and the
warning of Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on
DATE. There doesn't appear to be any other error on exit either in the
GUI or in the error log,
Why not just use tpautoconf -t?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of selwyn
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 8:10 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re: Media Changer Utility for Solaris
Curtis is correct, I use
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Johnson, Eric wrote:
I've noticed lately that when we perform our test restores, they
frequently complete with a status 1 (Partially successful) and the
warning of Restore must be resumed prior to first image expiration on
DATE. There doesn't appear to be any other
Again, the bottleneck here is an extremely slow API. If you have a
large SP farm, doc-level backups are impractical.
===
Steven L. Sesar
Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst
UNIX Application Services R101
The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington
As far as third party providers go,
Avepoint / DocAve is one of the leaders from what I hear.
Also Netapp will be re-branding the DocAve product and tweaking it to
work at a snapshot level. Think SnapManager for Sharepoint if you have
any Netapp to play with.
The STSADMIN tool is good to
CommVault also has a SP agent, however it too, uses the MS API to SP.
===
Steven L. Sesar
Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst
UNIX Application Services R101
The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road - MS K101
Bedford, MA 01730
tel:
Anyone have a link to or recent copy of Veritas Netbackup Pricing and
Licensing Guide?
Bobby Windle | W.L. Gore associates, Inc.
Backup / Disaster Recovery Admin
work: 302 292 4026
cell : 302 588 7374
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.gore.com
___
===
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-03009: failure of Control File Autobackup command on t1 channel
at 09/11/2007 09:19:52
ORA-19506: failed to create sequential file,
name=c-4090293236-20070911-08, parms=
ORA-27027: sbtremove2 returned error
I have seen this message when a filesystem has been filled to 100% of capacity.
Then the backup stops and it displays incomplete. I do not think it closes
with a status of 1.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via
I have not had good results with wizards defining devices for me. I suspect
that this command acts like a wizard.
When I setup the devices via a script they work, and I do not have to spend
valuable time figuring out why tape drives are not functioning properly.
What version are you using? Vault has been included since v5.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of UlrichJU
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 5:31 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Re: Tracking Tape Eject
That
All,
We're in the process of moving our servers to a new datacenter and with
the move, the IP address is going to change for our master and media
servers. Are there any gotchas we need to know before doing this?
Thanks,
Randy K. Zimmer
Sr. Unix System Administrator
Office: 314-694-3109
As long as you are using DNS and not host files it is pretty simple, the
DNS needs to propagate out, but other than that it is really straight
forward.
Regards,
Steve
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ZIMMER,
RANDY K
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000] wrote:
All,
We're in the process of moving our servers to a new datacenter and with
the move, the IP address is going to change for our master and media
servers. Are there any gotchas we need to know before doing this?
Thanks,
Randy K.
Hello Randy
What name resolution are you using? Providing all communication is done via
name, using a Service like WINS / DNS (preferred) then it should not really
cause a problem.
If you have clients that backup via IP address only, then these will need to
point to the new Server IP.
Other
36 matches
Mail list logo
