All,
Ok Well my weekend is done and I am currently running 6.5 instead of
5.1. Yippee!
There has been a handful of issues.
One of them is the detail.log session log is empty. Vaulting is working
just fine, just not logging anything with in the detail.log file.
I assume there must be an
Why don't we just move on..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Preston
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 6:52 PM
To: Eagle, Kent; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Tapeless backup
I am being told by the Unix Admin that because we run the Leadville
Driver we don't need persistent binding.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of bdoyle
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 12:01 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject:
Steve,
What was his/her explanation? I never heard of that before... However,
this is a learning forum. Please elaborate...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hudson,
Steve
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:59 AM
To:
Agree with you on that I set this subject to auto delete now a few weeks
back!
Regards
Simon Weaver
3rd Line Technical Support
Windows Domain Administrator
EADS Astrium Limited, B23AA IM (DCS)
Anchorage Road, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Excellent. TY
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of tburrell
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:04 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Flash backup for mount-points Windows 2003
Chris,
We set up one mount point as a
Here is some required reading on the topic from Val Henson, a noted
academic/storage-guru.
An Analysis of Compare-by-hash
www.nmt.edu/~val/review/hash.pdf
Of particular interst is why hardware error rates can't be compared
with deterministic software errors.
Austin
I'm trying to recover a catalog from a windows master server to another
windows master server I have in a lab environment.
The server names are the same. When I run the bprecover -l -tpath Tape1,
I get
IMAGE1 D:\Veritas\Netbackup\db
IMAGE2 D:\Veritas\Netbackup\var
IMAGE3
The driver uses the wwn in the device name. This does not change if the tape
drive is plugged into another card or port.
len
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 71 Jul 30 2004 /dev/rmt/3cbn -
../../devices/[EMAIL PROTECTED],60/SUNW,[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL
Im not sure if its still relevant for Solaris 10 but i remember in the
device admin guide it mentions that solaris unloads the least used
devices should the system be busy. These are usually tapes and so it
recommends adding the following lines into /etc/system
forceload: drv/st
forceload: drv/sg
This paper looks to be 5 years old (based on newest references it cites
- it actually cites others that go back nearly 10 years). It would be
interesting to see his take on current deduplication offerings to see if
the other checks they contain over simple hashing were enough to allay
his
I don't know. I, for one, am now thoroughly engrossed given Curtis' honor has
been impugned. =P
-Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Hall, Christian N.
Sent: Mon 10/22/2007 9:55 AM
To: Curtis Preston; Eagle, Kent; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Klebba, Don wrote:
I'm trying to recover a catalog from a windows master server to another
windows master server I have in a lab environment.
The server names are the same. When I run the bprecover -l -tpath Tape1,
I get
IMAGE1 D:\Veritas\Netbackup\db
IMAGE2
I remember having to do that back when I used Solaris in PROD backup
environments, seemed to be what was needed.
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Dave Markham wrote:
Im not sure if its still relevant for Solaris 10 but i remember in the
device admin guide it mentions that solaris unloads the least used
I figured it out.
The netbackup client service needs to be running.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klebba,
Don
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:17 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Catalog recovery
I'm trying to recover a
What do you mean by disappear? What log files have you examined so far?
What does modinfo info show for sg? What's the frequency of tape devices
disappearing? Also could you provide more information about you
environment physical/logical?
Thanks,
Chris Hall
-Original Message-
From:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 04:31:16PM +0100, Dave Markham wrote:
Im not sure if its still relevant for Solaris 10 but i remember in the
device admin guide it mentions that solaris unloads the least used
devices should the system be busy. These are usually tapes and so it
recommends adding the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Folks has anyone seen the issue we are seeing on Solaris 10. We have a Media
Server that is at Solaris 10 with the Leadville Driver on the HBA and we are
running Netbackup Enterprise Server version 5.1 MP5. Our tape drives keep
disappearing from the O/S and the drives
Anyone got any ideas on the best Unix training for Netbackup 6.0? Is
Symantec the best or should I go with someone else? Thanks, Kelly
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Funny. VERY Funny. ;)
---
W. Curtis Preston
Backup Blog @ www.backupcentral.com
VP Data Protection, GlassHouse Technologies
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jonathan
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 9:23 AM
To:
I think that part of the problem is that a hash duplication is nearly
undetectable until you have restored and tested it as false.
We all know that 99.999% of what we back up is never restored. It just
ages gracefully on media and is expired. If any of that .001% is
restored and is damaged due
Hello Mark,
Did I read in this list that netbackup was supposed to do some kind of checksum
on the data written to tape?
If so would a bpverify check this. I would assume that if netbackup does this
it would find the error.
because netbackup would do it's calc before passing the block to the
I am getting a media read error 85 when trying to restore some files from an
LTO-1 tape. I already swapped tape drives to rule out a bad drive.
This is on Netbackup 5.1 MP6 Windows. This system is up for legacy restores
only. The backup was made on a media server that no longer has drives
Try bpmedia -movedb -m media_id -newserver newmediaserver -oldserver
retiredmediaserver
and then try the restore
cheers
SA
ctate
24 matches
Mail list logo
