Re: [Veritas-bu] Can a Single NetBackup Client talk to MultipleMaster?Media?

If the client machines are Windows systems, then you could use multiple masters. If the client systems are anything else, you will have to go with a Enterprise wide master and media servers at the branches. Windows incremental backups in NB are based on the archive bit (unless someone has done

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can a Single NetBackup Client talk toMultipleMaster?Media?

Just FYI / Netbackup can backup on Windows via Archive bit or Timestamp. Timestamp isn't a HUGE issue in this case, the only issue being that the incremental will backup everything changed since the last incremental (including anything changed but backed up by the full.) Its not like timestamps

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can a Single NetBackup Client talk to Multiple Master?Media?

No solution should be based on a single full backup tape that is rewritten each week! First problem: if a full backup fails, you have no backup. Second problem: if your full backup overwrites the first, you have just invalidated (in any logical sense, while probably not NetBackup sense) any

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can a Single NetBackup Client talk to MultipleMaster?Media?

This won't work with the incremental backups. The second master server will think that nothing was backed up and do another full, and hike up their WAN usage. But I do agree that having one master server with a media server at each site is the better way to go. - Original Message -

Re: [Veritas-bu] Can a Single NetBackup Client talk to Multiple Master?Media?

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Wayne T Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No solution should be based on a single full backup tape that is rewritten each week! First problem: if a full backup fails, you have no backup. Second problem: if your full backup overwrites the first, you have just

[Veritas-bu] Thomas Schulz/DE/ConSors ist außer Haus.

Ich werde ab 20.03.2008 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 31.03.2008. Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten. Cortal Consors S.A. Zweigniederlassung Deutschland, Bahnhofstraße 55, D-90402 Nürnberg, HR Nürnberg B 20075, USt-IdNr. DE225900761 Sitz der Cortal Consors

[Veritas-bu] Can a Single NetBackup Client talk to Multiple Master?Media?

I don't see in here how much data you're talking about, but another option is to split your problem up between uptime and data protection... If you lose a server at a remote site (multi-drive failure in a raidset, spilled coffee, whatever) I can't see making that 4-hour SLA unless you have

[Veritas-bu] zfs

Anyone install Netbackup 6.5 on a Master Server Solaris 10 x64 zfs filesystem. Any know issues? Thanks Jim ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1 to 6.5

I'm getting ready to do Migration from a 5.1mp6 Sparc(V880-Sol 9) to a 6.5 Solaris 10 X64 server(x4500) (same hostname). I was planning on just doing a catalog backup and recovery to the new server but I'm doubting this will work. Instead I'll probably need to upgrade the V880 to 6.5.1 before I

[Veritas-bu] tape speed megabits or megabytes

Megabytes/second, or MB/s. Mb/s would be megabits. But tapes are in MB/s. +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Veritas-bu] tape speed megabits or megabytes

Usually when reading tape speed is it read as megabytes or megabit? +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]