[Veritas-bu] Cross-Platform Remote Admin Console

2008-07-08 Thread Esson, Paul
Folks, We have just installed NBU 6.5.2 on Solaris 10 with a mix of Solaris 10 and Windows Server 2003 Media Servers. We have a temporary requirement to allow the Windows Media Servers to run the Admin Console with a Change Server to the Master Server. The only trouble is that the response

[Veritas-bu] Status code 28 (failed trying to fork a process) NBU 6.5.1 on HP-UX 11.31

2008-07-08 Thread BeDour, Wayne
Our environment is Netbackup version 6.5.2; HP-UX 11.31 (11i v3). We have been getting intermittent status code 28 errors we have opened up a case with Symantec but haven't heard anything yet. We cycle NetBackup and things clear up for about a week and then we get the code 28's again. Anyone

Re: [Veritas-bu] Non-root administration

2008-07-08 Thread Ambrose, Monte
Paul This is what we do. sudo chgrp backupuser /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/* sudo chgrp backupuser /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/* sudo chgrp backupuser /usr/openv/volmgr/bin/* sudo chmod u+s /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/* sudo chmod u+s /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/* sudo chmod u+s

[Veritas-bu] Vault question.

2008-07-08 Thread Michitsch, John
One of our Vault polices was in a hung state. I thought I accounted for all of the batches before I killed the job. After killing it, batch 22 of 43 completed, 0 of 10 images duplicated. Since I killed it, there is nothing in the failed.images file. The batch log in the sessions folder

Re: [Veritas-bu] Cross-Platform Remote Admin Console

2008-07-08 Thread Ed Wilts
2008/7/8 Esson, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]: We have just installed NBU 6.5.2 on Solaris 10 with a mix of Solaris 10 and Windows Server 2003 Media Servers. We have a temporary requirement to allow the Windows Media Servers to run the Admin Console with a Change Server to the Master Server. The

Re: [Veritas-bu] Directing Backups to dedicated drives

2008-07-08 Thread Wongutan Google
Hi, 1. I suggest you, that let master server handle robotic arm ( Robot Control Host ), NetBackup 6.5 need more resource than lower version. 2. Only NetBackup software will be install in Master server, so all resource will only for NetBackup software in Master Server. 3. You can use SSO to device

[Veritas-bu] Solaris_x86 hardware class

2008-07-08 Thread Esson, Paul
Folks, Can someone explain how I add Solaris _x86_10 as an operating class in NetBackup 6.5? Do I have a separate client to install or is it simply a case of running the new_clients script? If the latter what is the syntax? I see the new_clients script in bin/goodies and the comments

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.2 and NDMP Backups

2008-07-08 Thread selwyn
After updating to 6.5.2 all my NDMP backup jobs were failing with status code 114. Looking at the job log I found this message path UNKNOWN. For some reason it looks like the ndmp agent is not sending the correct information about the backup path to Netbackup. Does anyone know how to

Re: [Veritas-bu] Solaris_x86 hardware class

2008-07-08 Thread Jon Bousselot
Paul, I believe you need to install the Solaris 10_x86 client software on the master server. This is one of the questions in the initial install script, where it asks if you want to install additional clients on this system. I usually install them all. Yes it wastes space, but then all the

[Veritas-bu] Fun with EMM internals

2008-07-08 Thread Nardello, John
Has anyone had the time to look around at the various binaries included with the internal ASA database in /usr/openv/db/bin ? In particular, I've been playing with dbunload and was wondering if there's anyone who knows something about ASA or Sybase who could explain why it dumps what look like a

Re: [Veritas-bu] Solaris_x86 hardware class

2008-07-08 Thread Esson, Paul
Jon, Thanks for the response. I released that I had only installed the Solaris (SPARC) client initially as I had not expected we would require Solaris_X86_10 at this time. Regards, Paul Esson -Original Message- From: Jon Bousselot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 July 2008 18:53