I am having the same issue. What is the workaround patch you mentioned??
Steve
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 12:47 AM, Jon Bousselot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
http://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=9490
Has anyone encountered this bug and the documented workaround did not
fix the problem?
So while I sit here going over why our backups have jumped from 2gb to 2tb
(not exaggerating either lol) I thought I might use some creative
bpimagelist work to generate a per day tape consumption. That worked well,
but what about what policies are consuming that data? No problem, back to
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, rascal wrote:
So while I sit here going over why our backups have jumped from 2gb to 2tb
(not exaggerating either lol) I thought I might use some creative
bpimagelist work to generate a per day tape consumption. That worked well,
but what about what policies are
Apparently the problem was due to a custom report setup in NOM that had some
issues with it. Once I corrected the problem, I could see all my scheduled
reports just fine...
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 07:43:11PM -0500, rascal wrote:
I have constructed what I thought would be a good command but I am running
into an error. Here is my command:
bplist -C clientname -S svrname -k policy_name -R -l -s 07/1/2008 00:00:00
-e 07/1/2008 23:59:59 /$HOME/policy_name_070108
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:25:55AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
You should use -R 9 (5 or 6, 9's) to get the (all) the file listings
per each client.
At least you need the -R (the default level of 999 is plenty for all my
filesystems).
When I was testing the output above, I had -R on my
Correction
C:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\Admincmd\bpexpdate -deassignempty
Search for empty media that meet the following criteria:
Media id: All
Continue? y/n (n)n
No changes made.
Doug Preston
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
C:\Program Files\VERITAS\NetBackup\bin\Admincmdbpexpdate -deassignempty
Doug Preston
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Cleverley
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 3:12 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Media and
Rascal,
You have to supply a directory of some kind or the command won't work. So
replace this:
bplist -C clientname -S svrname -k policy_name -R -l -s 07/1/2008 00:00:00
-e 07/1/2008 23:59:59 /$HOME/policy_name_070108
With this:
bplist -C clientname -S svrname -k policy_name -R -l -s
Currently I have a primary AIX 6.0 MP5 Master in Cleveland. My goal in
the coming months is to have Sungard house another master server for
disaster recovery. I need some suggestions on how I can keep the Sungard
master which is not connected to a tape library, just external disk in step
we keep our tapes offsite and have then delivered to sungard.
sungard will have a server with solaris 10 installed with a sans and
library attached.
when i show up i load netbackup. import the catalog, clean up the
hardware configuration, run the wizard to add in the drives and robot.
open the
We have a duplicate master and media server lights out at the Sungard
facility in Philadelphia. We replicate our catalog (along with all of
our other production data) using Data Domain appliances (2 boxes in St.
Louis and 2 in Philadelphia). When we arrive in Philly we boot up the
master server
I believe the problem there is an issue with that OS.
The last I heard is that HP is working on the process forking issue, and think
they have it fixed. I don't know which OS patch is required to fix it though.
+--
|This was
All,
I'm running into a very interesting problem. I have a client that is
using NetBackup 4.5 MP6. We've imported an image backed up from another
master server back in February. When we do a catalog verify search we
see the image available and bpimagelist shows the image has not expired
yet.
How big is the catalog?
If it is small you could back it up over the wire or copy a backed up version
over the wire.
If it is big look into an incremental update method like VVR.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi Jon,
I've looked to the NBU6.5 HCL, and the SL24 supported either with FC, or
SCSI.
Since you already upgraded to 6.5.2, and Symantec already released the
6.5.2a, why don't you try to go with it.
you can check here: http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/305652.htm
there's some robot issue
16 matches
Mail list logo