Re: [Veritas-bu] Is there way to get smaller chunk of patch ?

Speeds are going fine from my location. Are you able to use a download manager or anything to open up multiple streams to try to pull it faster? - Original Message - From: "Anil Maurya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Sent: Monday, December 8, 2008 2:15:25 PM GM

[Veritas-bu] Is there way to get smaller chunk of patch ?

I am trying to ftp NB_CLT_6.5.3_314595.tar file on my test server. But system is slow so I am not able to ftp over. This tar is size of around 900MB. Is there smaller chunk available so I can burn CD can copy over instead ftp ? THX ___ Veritas-bu mail

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?)

DST change is March 8. At the NetBackup Tech Day in Roseville today, they were talking about May/June for 6.5.4.<http://6.5.4.> .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scr

Re: [Veritas-bu] client - jbpSA

I don't recall the details as it has been some time ago. We didn't really spend a lot of time troubleshooting. Once we saw RMAN issues happening right after the NBU master (and all the Media Servers) had been upgraded we decided it made sense to upgrade the clients that were running RMAN backups

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?)

At the NetBackup Tech Day in Roseville today, they were talking about May/June for 6.5.4.<http://6.5.4.> .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://ma

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?)

At the NetBackup Tech Day in Roseville today, they were talking about May/June for 6.5.4.<http://6.5.4.> .../Ed Ed Wilts, RHCE, BCFP, BCSD, SCSP, SCSE [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL

Re: [Veritas-bu] client - jbpSA

Cheers Jeff, any specifics as all looks good so far? Would hate to have overlooked something. Regards David Clooney Enterprise Storage Services Internal X66059 External +44 20 8760 6059 [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 December 200

Re: [Veritas-bu] client - jbpSA

We saw lots of issues with RMAN backups until we upgrade the clients to match the master when we went to 6.x. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 10:15 AM To: Clooney, David Cc: verita

Re: [Veritas-bu] Serious bug w/ 6.5.2 (and beyond?): perpetually requeueing j

I was assured that EEBs would be made available if 6.5.4 were not released by the next DST change. Those potentially affected (6.5.2[A] and above, affects all platforms) will probably want to open cases and request that EEB. The Symantec bug ID you want to reference is ET1447178. (I just sent a

Re: [Veritas-bu] client - jbpSA

You are on the right track. Try upgrading the clients, there have been a number of upgrades to the java software. -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619 "Cl

[Veritas-bu] Drive name rules in 6.5

Has anyone used the drive name rules in NBU 6.5 with the wizard? I set them in the wizard, create the rule, and run the wizard and yet the rule for the drive name does not get picked up when the drive is created. ___ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] client - jbpSA

Hi all Just a quick one for confirmation, I upgraded an environment weekend just gone from 5.1MP6 to 6.5.1. Our DBA's are informing me that they are having issues launching "jbpSA" from the oracle clients. Clients are still at 5.1 MP6 so I guess this is to be expected due to version incompatibil

Re: [Veritas-bu] problem after upgrade to 6.5.3

No it isn't the C++ version. Most windows servers do not have C++ installed on them. The server works ok now that it had a complete uninstall reboot and a new install. There must have been a corrupt registry entry or file. That's what I get for doing remote installs on patches. Doug Preston

Re: [Veritas-bu] BMR boot servers virtualised?

Hi! I don't know if its supported or not. But if all NBU-clients are VM's why would you then need BMR? Assuming you mean VMware-virtualized.. a VCB Imagelevel would be sufficient wouldn't it? Anders From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Sent: 5. desember 2008 01: