On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Roedy boy wrote:
Hi all,
I have added a new LTO4 drive in SL500 Tape Library with 5 existing LTO3
drive, I have succesfull to backup LTO3 media with LTO4 drive, but when i did
inventory LTO4 media it's recognized as DLT media not HCART, is anyone know
why this
Yes,
both LTO 3 and LTO4 are HP brand.
Thanks.
Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Roedy boy wrote:
Hi all,
I have added a new LTO4 drive in SL500 Tape Library with 5 existing LTO3
drive, I have succesfull to backup LTO3 media with LTO4 drive, but when i
did inventory LTO4
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Hermawan wrote:
Yes,
both LTO 3 and LTO4 are HP brand.
Thanks.
Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2008, Roedy boy wrote:
Hi all,
I have added a new LTO4 drive in SL500 Tape Library with 5 existing LTO3
drive, I have succesfull to backup LTO3 media with LTO4
selam herkeze
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
I believe he was saying the tapes themselves are being recognized as dlt media.
That sounds like you have the wrong bar codes on the tapes to me.
First, check what the library itself is reporting, and change the barcodes if
neccessary. If the library does not think the tapes are LTO4, NBU
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 09:25:07PM -0500, Dennis Peacock wrote:
OK...here's what I'm looking to do. I have 149 master backup
servers. 47 of them are Netbackup. Each master is a different
customer. I'm looking to automate a Backup Audit Report for
Netbackup. It was easy enough to do for
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 07:51:51PM -0800, Roedy boy wrote:
Hi all,
I have added a new LTO4 drive in SL500 Tape Library with 5 existing
LTO3 drive, I have succesfull to backup LTO3 media with LTO4 drive,
but when i did inventory LTO4 media it's recognized as DLT media not
HCART, is anyone
It's not that I don't trust it, it's that the customer requires that
info for the SAS70 Audit of their backups. So it has to be part of the
audit report.
Thank You,
Dennis Peacock
EBCA
Acxiom Corporation
501-342-6232 (office)
-Original Message-
From:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:03:31AM -0600, Peacock Dennis - dpeaco wrote:
It's not that I don't trust it, it's that the customer requires that
info for the SAS70 Audit of their backups. So it has to be part of the
audit report.
What I'm saying is that it's not clear if you're trying to glean
You might want to also check your barcode rules. The labels on the LTO4
tapes may be the same as an old DLT barcode.
Richard Mickle | Systems Administrator 3 | RR Donnelley Technology
Services
1333
We tried this, and came to the conclusion that it won't work because of the way
Exchange and the NetBackup extension for Exchange work together. It's
basically required that you use the DNS name for the exchange server to access
the database properly to back it up properly.
Sounds like what you want to do is a merging of masters witch officially
required Symantec consulting services; or you could make one of your masters
into a master of masters.
+--
|This was sent by spal...@spaldam.com via
You can use a backup network for exchange backups, however, you need add
entries to your hosts file on the backup server. Use the name of the
exchange server in the hosts file but use the ip of the exchange backup
network interface. You will have to ensure that the backup server looks
to the
I'm seeing status 23, 24 25 (socket errors) on various backups for the
past couple of weeks but don't know why.
Network seems to be OK.
On looking at troubleshooting it suggests running Netbackup
Configuration Validation Utility (NCVU).
On going looking for this I don't have it on
I started to see problems with the Master server not allowing connections to
the EMM database shortly after setting up NOM. Apparently the EMM database has
a limit on the number of connections it will allow, and with NOM and a half
dozen Java Admin Consoles running, we started to see
Be save use ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES, then exclude all your database, temporary,
device, and other special files. There are plenty of other settings that you
can use to control other performance/trashing concerns.
+--
|This was sent
I saw this problem myself, and adding another barcode rule fixed it.
+--
|This was sent by spal...@spaldam.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
I want to use a VIP for my NOM install so that when I replace/move servers
around in the future I can keep the same IP and DNS name for the NOM connection
and not have to re-do firewall rules to all of our different NetBackup
environments. Is this even possible? Will using the bp.conf in the
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of spaldam
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:06 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Force Interface for NOM
I want to use a VIP for
How do I unsubscribe from this mailing list?
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of spaldam
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:06 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Force
I'm trying to replace the Master server with some new hardware, (simple enough
to do, and I've done this successfully before) but I'd also like to cluster the
master server. I've done some testing on this using a catalog recovery that
looks perfectly fine at first, until it's brought into the
Reposting my survey, need a few more to complete my findings.
Thanks again for all who have participated.
Below is the link to my survey. Thank you for your help.
I will post my findings when completed.
Survey is on Reducing Costs of Backups.
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:11 PM, spaldam
netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.comwrote:
I'm trying to replace the Master server with some new hardware, (simple
enough to do, and I've done this successfully before) but I'd also like to
cluster the master server. I've done some testing on this using
Well I think I figured out the socket errors.
We have a backup LAN defined and on the master we have two NICs on that
LAN. For some reason it appears a lot of the traffic that formerly went
out the first NIC (which is what we have in local hosts files on the
clients defined for the master's
Um... there is no such thing as HCART4. You have to decide whether you're going
to define your LTO-4 drives as HCART3 (and risk getting all your LTO-4 media
frozen when NetBackup puts it in an LTO-3 drive) or define your LTO-4 drives as
HCART (and not get to use LTO-3 media in them). No,
We are using the clustering script that comes with NetBackup. The problem I
think is that the script drops the old EMM database and recreates a new one
with the new cluster configuration. It then says it's populating the new
database, but apparently it's not doing a very good job of putting
A few of you're survey questions are poorly worded and make no sense, or seam
loaded. Yes you can reduce costs related to backups for some of the scenarios,
but at potential costs to your overall budget, especially if a disaster occurs
and restores take too long.
27 matches
Mail list logo
