Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup Job error w/Status 6

We get a status 6, especially for logs, but if there is nothing there, we get the same status code. DBA Team verify this, but enable some logging on the client and talk to the DBA's to be sure :-) simon From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exchange 2003 Store unmounts during the backup(NetBackup 6.5)

To Rule NetBackup out, you would have to rule any other services that could be running (ie: AV especially if its configured to scan the Exchange Stores and logs - Bad idea by the way!). How large is the store that was dismounted? I did see a problem on Ex2k itself some time ago, very similar with

[Veritas-bu] MSEO and normal backups to same media

Guys I'm running (Or will be after upgrading from 5.0mp7) Netbackup 6.5.4 Master server with MS Encryption Option installed. I know i can set the encryption per policy and we have requirement to backup 2 machines with encryption and not the rest. My question is can encrypted and none encrypted

Re: [Veritas-bu] MSEO and normal backups to same media

I'm sure it says in the manual that you can mix MSEO and non-MSEO on a single tape. You may think that is going to create a problem as you'll have to treat all your media as if it contains encrypted data. I know the idea of encryption is so you don't lose data when you lose media, but it's

[Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

anyone brave enough to install it yet? i know it's a service pack but i'm always getting emails from Symantec about how your backups are gone if you do so and so +-- |This was sent by alent1...@gmail.com via Backup Central.

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

Just downloading. Simon -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of sql_noob Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 3:51 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

Master and two san media servers are installed so no client-side agents deployed yet.. looks OK so far.. I just checked my nightly runs and it all looks normal (all blue except for some usual suspects that give me problems regardless of version). Even my vault staging processes work ~ Robin

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

I tried to download Veritas LINUX 64 6.5.4 client, but can NOT find file NB_6.5.4.linuxR_x86.tar . i even search Symantech site and can't find it. Anyoneone know where is NB_6.5.4.linuxR_x86.tar ? Thanks. Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:06:19 -0500 From: ewi...@ewilts.org To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

We installed the FA version a couple of weeks ago. There have not been any serious problems, -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619 sql_noob

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

I have been trying to read the docs and no where can I find where it says the DFSR issue has been fixed. I can find that it says it is suppose to be fixed in 6.5.4 but it never says it has. Has anybody found anything that says it has or has not? From:

[Veritas-bu] bpadm error

All, I am trying to setup some policies on a remote master server via bpadm and I keep getting this error when I choose (p) Policy Management... Unable to get Class_att_defs file. Error: cannot connect on socket (25) Anyone see this before? Thanks, -Kevin

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

Hi, Wrong filename: $ wget ftp://ftp.nbu.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/NB_6.5.4.linuxR_x86_326374.tar --2009-XX-XX XX:XX:XX-- ftp://ftp.nbu.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/NB_6.5.4.linuxR_x86_326374.tar =

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

The DFSR issue being you need to stop DFSR before backing up the FS and then start it again to resume replication? On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com wrote: I have been trying to read the docs and no where can I find where it says the DFSR issue has been fixed. I can find

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpadm error

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Baumann, Kevin wrote: All, I am trying to setup some policies on a remote master server via bpadm and I keep getting this error when I choose (p) Policy Management... Unable to get Class_att_defs file. Error: cannot connect on socket (25) Anyone see this

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

Yes, sorry I did not qualify that - it has just been such a pain in my side that I just call it the DFS ISSUE. And right now it is the ONLY reason I need to upgrade ( but the new stuff to nom has me wanting to upgrade) -Original Message- From: Justin Piszcz

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

Hi I'm nott familiar with the DFSR issue.. Please explain. Carl -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619 judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com 06/18/2009 11:36

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

On windows servers you can use DFSR ( a windows thing - serverA drive F is always sending its changes up to serverB drive N. We use it for remote sites where we cannot backup, it sends its files to us where I can backup) The thing is in version 5 you could backup just fine. In version 6 you

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

Thanks End for the links ( I have not gotten that digest yet) But I found a doc that says DFSR is fixed and what you have to change to make it work DOCUMENTATION: Protecting Distributed File System Replication (DFSR) data with NetBackup 6.5.4 http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/326098.htm

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

I've been running 6.5.4 (via the FA program) in production for a week and a half now without issues and in a testing environment for about a month before that (through some beta versions). Your environments may have corner cases that mine lack, but there don't appear to be any glaring issues in

Re: [Veritas-bu] MSEO and normal backups to same media

Dave, In addition to the comments Mr. Brown has been kind enough to provide, I'd like add a note about multiplexing. See page 84 of the MSEO Admin Guide. The note is applicable to multiplexing encrypted and non-encrypted backups together. Thanks, Bill On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:31 AM,

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpadm error

What happens if you run: $ /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bppolicynew test $ # /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bppolicynew test cannot connect on socket Is your master working? bpps -a output? # bpps -a NB Processes /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/nbsl

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpadm error

On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Baumann, Kevin wrote: What happens if you run: $ /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bppolicynew test $ # /usr/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/bppolicynew test cannot connect on socket Is your master working? bpps -a output? # bpps -a NB Processes

[Veritas-bu] LTO4 Question

Can Decru LKM manage keys for LTO4 native encryption. And is anyone doing this? Steve Hudson Enterprise Storage Iron Mountain 745 Atlantic Ave Boston, MA 02111 Phone: (617) 535-2849 steve.hud...@ironmountain.com Visit the new www.ironmountain.com Tour Iron Mountain

[Veritas-bu] Temporarily exclude tapes from being ejected by vault

We have been getting some negative feedback from our Operations staff about having to reload tapes into our Tape Silo after our vault runs. The tapes are always tapes that we have recalled from our outside Vault Company and are being used for a system restore. Sometimes those restores can

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 Question

Hello Steve, I do not know if the Decru LKM can do this. But we are planning to do LTO4 native encryption with IBM tape drives in an IBM 3584 tape library. We found that the EMC RSA key manager will handle keys for the LTO-4 tape drives. But to do so you have to have the IBM EKM (Encryption

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 Question

I was talking to Bill Bolton from Brocade at a SNIA Academy day in London, asking about how to get an LKM that was not tied to one product - we might want to use the same LKM for Brocade encryption switches for example - we don't want a row of LKMs. I got this info: [There is an...]

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.4 appearing on FTP site

Thanks for the explanation. I work with the UNIX systems, and I am not sure we use it on our Windows systems. -- Carl Stehman Distributed Services Pepcoholdings, Inc. 701 Ninth St NW Washington DC 20068 202-331-6619

Re: [Veritas-bu] MSEO and normal backups to same media

Also note that with MSEO you do not have tape compression. One of our customers (bank) goes from 6 hours full backup to 18. You must have a very powerful system to run MSEO _ From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf

[Veritas-bu] Temporarily exclude tapes from being ejected by vault

The vault selection screen allows you to select the date or time range to vault - if set to only vault yesterday backups, it will not vault backups from prior days. Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:08:54 -0400 From: JBrownell netbackup-fo...@backupcentral.com Subject: [Veritas-bu] Temporarily

Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO4 Question

You said: I do not know if the Decru LKM can do this. But we are planning to do LTO4 native encryption with IBM tape drives in an IBM 3584 tape library. We found that the EMC RSA key manager will handle keys for the LTO-4 tape drives. But to do so you have to have the IBM EKM (Encryption Key

[Veritas-bu] New NBU VCB Proxy Error 71

All, Having an issue with a new VCB Proxy server, we have another existing VCB proxy that works fine, here are the particulars: Netbackup Enterprise - 6.5.3.1, on both the master and vcb proxy VCB Version 1.5 I have the following set in the policy MS Windows NT Datastore Volume pool