/usr/openv/netbackup/bin/tar -tMvb 128 -f /tmp/tapeid worked under NBU4.5
for listing the contains of a multiplexed backup
this command is for a block size of 64K.
Regards
Michael
2010/4/19 Markus, Istvan istvan.mar...@hp.com
NetBackup 6.5: Phase 2 import stops as fragment 1 is no more
Well i dont think the tape has unloaded, but it's getting stranger .
This is the final 20 odd lines from bpbkar log on the windows client.
This to be says the job has finished and ties in with the start time of
22:00.
22:32:46.684: [4448.2988] 2 tar_base::backup_finish: TAR - backup:
13574
Dave
Is it just this one client?
Wondered if the client needed a bounce? Sounds like the activity from
the client is not being passed back to the Master.
If its one client - Reboot it perhaps if possible?
Simon
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Hi All,
Setup - Win2k3 SP2 Master and new RedHat5 Server, as VM. Tape Drives are
LTO4 in Robotic Sun Library.
Currently holds 2TB's data
question. Backups over lan for this VM takes around 15hours.
Files are a real variety of sizes. Without paying out anything
additional, is there anything on
List,
I have a Sun v440 running solaris 8 and NBU 6.5 and want to upgrade.
Are there any gotchas upgrading the master to solaris 10. Could
someone share any experiences doing something similar? Also, is it
possible to restore the catalog from this sparc solaris 8 system to a
new linux/NBU system?
Hi,
I have a set of tapes that contain an important backup. The backup has
expired, but the tapes haven't been over-written, and I intend to bpimport
them at a future time.
In the meantime I want to freeze the tapes, but trying to freeze an unassigned
tape produces the message requested
So I was having a conversation with one of the NBU product managers at
Vision last week and I was told something I hadn't heard before.
Apparently the Sybase ASA database running behind Netbackup is now
multithreaded and nbrb performance has improved. In all the
conversations and presentations
I knew about this, I think I read it once, and heard it once. But I
have not upgraded yet.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Stafford, Geoff
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 1:38 PM
To:
It should have been multithreaded from the start, they are about 3 years late.
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:07 PM
To: gstaff...@barclaycardus.com;
Hi,
Regarding the move of netbackup from Solaris to Linux, this is the answer.
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/337970.htm,
stefanos
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Victor Engle
Hi,
Just wanted to know if anyone out there has a large master with 1000+ clients,
8000+ jobs a day, mixture of DBs, NDMP, OSs, mixture of storage like tape
libraries and VTLs etc etc.
Just wanted to know what version you use, any issues or thoughts you'd like to
share. Feel free to reply
11 matches
Mail list logo
