Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware VCB VDR

2010-09-09 Thread Praveen Gupta
You need an enterprise client license for NBU. Process with VDR is pretty smooth and quick in comparison to VCB. Thanks, Praveen Gupta -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of tkutil Sent: Friday,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-09 Thread Nate Sanders
Yeah it sounds like disk pools may be the answer. The thing that has me confused is that for 9 straight days before our 5.1MP6--6.5.6 upgrade, I had 0 failed jobs. I found two problems in two different policies that were the cause of all previous DSSU troubles and as able to fix them. So suddenly

Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-09 Thread Larry Fahnoe
Here's a quick little script that will validate images on DSSU and let you know if there are images that are not in the catalog. I'd make sure the contents of your DSSUs make sense before I looked further. You might also want to destage more frequently. --Larry #!/bin/sh usage() { echo

Re: [Veritas-bu] Understanding DSSU

2010-09-09 Thread Nate Sanders
We're down to destaging every 2 hours. This is as low as it has ever been. When we were on NBU 5.1MP6 we were destaging between 4-6 hours with 0 failed jobs. It doesn't seem to add up to me, I've also run checks against dead images on the DSSU's. Out of 6 DSSU's and thousands of images, only 6

[Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6

2010-09-09 Thread WEAVER, Simon (external)
Hi All, Got a little puzzle, that I cannot seem to track where the problem is, but here goes... Win2k3 SP2 Ent + NBU 6.5.6 Master, Media and all clients. It all went on well (Originally 6.5.3) apart from BMR Boot Server still showing 6.5.3, although I will look into that later by reapplying the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6

2010-09-09 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
When you upgrade the files can get over written. So you file that you had modified to tell you what levels to email on may have been overwritten. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon (external) Sent:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Vmware VCB VDR

2010-09-09 Thread Kevin Corley
Anybody using a good way to dump the VDR images to tape (netbackup) for long term retention? -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Praveen Gupta Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 1:10 AM To:

[Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Anybody have any hints on how to restore files from a windows server to a MAC server? Judy Hinchcliffe AIX Systems Engineer, Technology - Infrastructure Services 19001 Crecent Springs Drive Mail Stop 2-5335 Kingwood, Texas 77339 OFFICE: 281-312-3538

Re: [Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread scott . george
I did this old school. I turned on the FTP server on the Mac, and used Filezilla to mass copy everything over that I wanted. It wasn't elegant, but it worked. Scott E. George Technical Specialist - Lead UNIX Systems Administrator From: judy_hinchcli...@administaff.com To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread scott . george
I forgot about the maillist. If you are doing this with NBU, I would think backing up the Windows client as a standard client and then restoring from that backup would work. I had a slew of Windows servers get changed to standard clients and they backed up just fine, but wouldn't show up as

Re: [Veritas-bu] restore windows files to a MAC

2010-09-09 Thread judy_hinchcliffe
Problem is errors I get when trying to restore from the windows backup directly to the MAC. 17:17:48 (1624234.001) File /dir/dir_Content/ DEVELOPMENT/.DS_Store exists. Keeping it. 17:17:48 (1624234.001) Windows security info file type 'L' for .SeCuRiTy.4, ignored... I got both L and U file

Re: [Veritas-bu] old policies

2010-09-09 Thread David McMullin
My standard is to make a policy that never runs named ARCHIVED and put the clients there. If clients are not in a policy they do not show up in various lists, NB should scan the images directory for them but does not... It is also easier when installing to put them in a policy that does not run

Re: [Veritas-bu] old policies

2010-09-09 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:14 PM, David McMullin david.mcmul...@cbc-companies.com wrote: My standard is to make a policy that never runs named ARCHIVED and put the clients there. If clients are not in a policy they do not show up in various lists, NB should scan the images directory for them

Re: [Veritas-bu] Email Notifications - Changed after 6.5.6

2010-09-09 Thread William Brown
The upper one looks like those from the ‘notify’ scripts on /usr/openv/netbackup/bin. They get overwritten which is a pain. I also discovered that at 6.5.6 some get extra parameters related to multi-stream jobs. Amusingly one gets I think 7 parameters now, checks it has at least 6, and the

[Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 R2 NBU 7.0 Master, attempting CIFS Basic Disk S

2010-09-09 Thread spaldam
mozje wrote: Just as a followup should people care. This is working perfectly in nbu, you only need to setup the cifs share correctly :) which was not the case at my first attempts. How do you set it up correctly? (as apposed to incorrectly) Thanks.