We have run the DD460 and DD690 (and continue to run the latter). Back
in November we got the DXi 6500 to replace our two DD460s.
Performance wise I really like the Data Domain products - they do the
compression they promise. So far I've seen nothing with the DXi 6500
that leads me to
Hello All
I have a quick question regarding NBU 7.0.1 and the VMware integration.
Is is OK to treat the vCenter host (which is itself a VM) as a regular
VM for backup purposes? So it would essentially be taking a snapshot of
itself and presenting it the VMware backup host?
Using vCenter 4.1
Hi Mark,
You were right to explore lower cost alternative solutions for your
deduplication needs. As a long-time Data Domain customer you have firsthand
experience on how expensive those solutions can be. It is unfortunate however
that at the time you were evaluating a newer, lower cost
On the Quantum,
When we were looking at it a while back, I understood that for each client you
threw at it, it would store a non-deduped initial base image of that client
and dedupe around it, as opposed to deduping everything including base images
and incrementals.
Is that still the case?
~
Hi,
We are facing strange issue for backup of one of the client using RMAN. The
netbackup server is 5.1 hosted on solaris and the client is windows. There are
4 databases hosted on the client but out of these 4 databases backup of one of
them has been failing. Below is the error:
Released
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Sushil wrote:
Hi,
We are facing strange issue for backup of one of the client using RMAN. The
netbackup server is 5.1 hosted on solaris and the client is windows. There
are 4 databases hosted on the client but out of these 4 databases backup of
one of them has been
Our understanding is that the initial image goes to cache (ssd) then is
compressed to permanent storage (RAID6). Subsequent backups are block
deduped from that original compressed copy.This is similar to the
way it worked with Data Domain except they do it inline on the fly.
That is to say
The update_dbclients script seems to have gone away in 7.x, I just
upgraded. Is there a different method for updating Oracle clients?
--
Nate SandersDigital Motorworks
System Administrator (512) 692 - 1038
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
We are currently using PureDisk and NBU 5000 as well as DataDomain in our
many far-flung backup environments. Each one has its place. One thing to
remember that with the NBU7 deduplication or the NBU5000. You need an
additional per-TB deduplication option license for each TB of data that is
I believe that the db agents are installed and updated in the same process used
for the client backup/archive code.
-Original Message-
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Nate Sanders
Sent: Monday, February 14,
No. The normal operation is a true inline dedup, but you have an option to
delay the dedup. We use the inline method and our OST-connected 6550 has
met or exceeded our performance expectations.
Cheers, Wayne
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Robin Small
robin.sm...@fresno.govwrote, in part:
So when updating from 6.5.6 clients to 7.0.1 via the update_clients
script, I should expect it to also update the installed Oracle agent as
well?
On 02/14/2011 12:19 PM, Len Boyle wrote:
I believe that the db agents are installed and updated in the same process
used for the client
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Nate Sanders sande...@dmotorworks.comwrote:
So when updating from 6.5.6 clients to 7.0.1 via the update_clients
script, I should expect it to also update the installed Oracle agent as
well?
Even if it was not installed before, it will be after you update.
Do FBSD clients still require Linux library support or does it have it's
own native client yet? So far the former seems true based on my searching.
--
Nate SandersDigital Motorworks
System Administrator (512) 692 - 1038
This message and any attachments are intended only for
That would explain why I had a few systems fill up /usr, thanks.
On 02/14/2011 02:17 PM, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Nate Sanders
sande...@dmotorworks.com mailto:sande...@dmotorworks.com wrote:
So when updating from 6.5.6 clients to 7.0.1 via the update_clients
15 matches
Mail list logo
