I found a Symantec technote on this issue.
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/276374.htm
I think such a dubious behaviour of NetBackup is rather frustrating.
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
Hello,
Master: Solaris 9; NetBackup 5.1 MP6
Client: Windows 2000, 2003; NetBackup 5.1 MP5 or MP6.
We encounter a stange thing with NetBackup as it backs up MS SQL files on some
of Windows hosts.
There are puzzling info messages in bpbkar.log on some NetBackup clients:
6:13:46.708:
Well, we've got a single SF V490 master server and 4 media servers. We
extensively use multistreaming and multiplexing and have got about 200 Oracle
instances to back up.
As a result we have
1) 8000 to 1 jobs a day
2) 30Tb of backup traffic on workday and up to 70-80 Tb on weekend
I'd like to get some info to ponder it afterwards.
I'd wish to know what is a let's say normal number of jobs per day for an
average master server in your environment regardless of NetBackup version you
run?
+--
|This was
Hello,
In our NetBackup environment we intensively use RMAN scripts to backup Oracle
instances. Currently we backup
up over 70 Oracle instances. We have suddenly noticed a strange and puzzling.
thing. If Full or Incremental backup
job that backs up Oracle instance fails when sucessfull
Feel free to modify this scripts.
cat win_coverage.ksh
#!/usr/bin/ksh
#
#This script checks if NetBackup policies cover all the local drives of
Windows-based clients,
#builds HTMLed report on drives that are turn to be uncovered and sends this
report as e-mail attachment
#to Netbackup admins
