Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Standard or Enterprise

2009-08-24 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
From a licensing perspective, if you were doing a standalone instance then yes the Standard version would be fine. Since you are incorporating it into an existing Enterprise instance, you would need an Enterprise NetBackup server license since this server would most likely be a media server for

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris

2009-04-22 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
There's a white paper out there when Sun was using a T5220 as a media server streaming to about 6-8 StorageTek 1 drives. When we refreshed our NetBackup infrastructure in one location, we did something very similar to this where I have a T5220 as a media server streaming to 6 LTO-4 FC

Re: [Veritas-bu] Why netbackup auto overwrite?

2009-03-05 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
How are you getting a single media ID to hold 3TB? The largest tape capacity I know of is the LTO-4 at 1.2TB per tape... On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:31 PM, KinAn netbackup- fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: No,no Because at dayn+1 I see tape ID 01 have ~3TB, but dayn+2 I see tape ID 01

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup LiveUpdate Troubleshooting

2009-03-04 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
Check the webserver logs for the LiveUpdate repository. That's how I found out that NBU was hanging up with trying to get the miniflg.tri file due to a MIME issue. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Using Fiber Channel Drives in 6.5

2009-03-04 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
What's sgscan showing? You may need to go through the whole sg driver installation process so the drives are visible to NBU. From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Thompson, Jeff Sent:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Live Update.

2009-02-11 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
The two are vastly different. NBU LiveUpdate probably could not co-exist on a SAV LU Server because the files which identify which packages to get would not contain information about the other product (i.e. a NBU LU Server would not contain information on SAV and vice-versa). Because there are

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Live Update.

2009-02-11 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
I have successfully gotten it working with a IIS 6.0 Web Server and a Solaris 10 Client. So far it looks pretty sweet, I'm actually gearing up for a full out deployment of it soon now that I have my test case working. -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] printout Vault profile

2009-02-11 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
/opt/openv/netbackup/bin/vltadm -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Preston, Doug Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 1:32 PM To: Stump, Bob A; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows Mount points ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES

2009-02-04 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
Is D:\data something special (like a disk attached at a mountpoint or a SAN volume)? You might be able to do this as your backup selections: ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES D:\data From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu

Re: [Veritas-bu] Decommission a library

2009-02-04 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
Remove the media from the L700e and have NetBackup inventory the robot. This will put all the tapes into standalone. Then put the tapes into the SL500 and inventory the new robot, NetBackup will see the tapes in that new robot and adjust the locations accordingly. This of course assumes you

Re: [Veritas-bu] Enterprise Vs Standard license

2009-02-03 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
NetBackup Standard = Allowes a Single Combined Master+Media Server NetBackup Enterprise = Allows Multiple Master/Media Servers -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of reddi72 Sent: Tuesday,

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5 and Quantum Scalar 50

2009-02-03 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
Mailslots are not treated as a normal slot as far as NetBackup is concerned. You need to have an empty slot for the tape to go into before NetBackup can then move it into a drive or import it into the library. As a general rule of thumb, I will usually allocate one empty slot per mailslot in my

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.5.3

2009-02-03 Thread Clausen, Matt R[EQ]
If NetBackup is going to back up files on a server, you need the client software. The entire NetBackup suite is Client/Server based where the server connects to the client and basically sucks the files back to the server to place into the appropriate storage based on the policy. I'm not sure

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5 linux client software help

2008-12-17 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Dave, The 6.5_CLIENTS2 tarball should be the one you need. That should be the one with the Linux client files in it (1 is HP-UX, AIX, etc. and 3 is mostly Solaris). The file you downloaded is the actual NetBackup installation for a master or media server. Once you install the client, then you

Re: [Veritas-bu] Confusing disk staging methods

2008-12-17 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Here are the basics: 1. Basic Disk Staging Backup to Disk First then a Destaging schedule duplicates the backup image to tape media. Once the image is successfully destaged to tape, it is then removed from the disk depending on how your low/high water marks are set. You need enough disk space

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

2008-12-04 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Are you running this under Solaris? If so, have you turned off tcp fusion? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stafford, Geoff Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 11:53 AM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on

Re: [Veritas-bu] Reg: LTO3

2008-11-21 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Regarding the tape-drive based compression though, I think by default the drive does not compress (actually I'm fairly positive this is the case). The driver has to instruct the tape drive to enable hardware compression. In the case of solaris, this is done based on which device you are

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to find out who cancelled a Backup in NBU

2008-11-14 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
What version of NetBackup as well? If it's 6.5.X you might be able to check the unified logs in /opt/openv/logs and see if they tell you anything. I know whenever I do policy manipulations they show up in there. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Refreshing trial license for media server

2008-11-13 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Run /opt/openv/netbackup/bin/admincmd/get_license_key then delete the old trial key and Add the new one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of dbergen Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:27 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject:

[Veritas-bu] MySQL Backups via Snapshot Client?

2008-11-06 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Has anyone used the Snapshot client (or snapshotting in general) to backup a MySQL database? I have some 24/7 MySQL databases that I can't shutdown to export all their files (these are some very large databases and it would take too much time) and I've been looking for a better way to back them

Re: [Veritas-bu] Which license should we buy ?

2008-11-05 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Generally you should run this by your Symantec sales rep. since they are always the foremost authority in what you need in terms of licensing. This is what I think you will need, but again, check with your sales rep. You need 3 NetBackup Enterprise Licenses... which ones depend on your

Re: [Veritas-bu] DSSU De-Staging Hanging

2008-10-22 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Upgrade to NBU 6.5.2A, it fixed a lot of issues with duplication. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin, Jonathan Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 9:06 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] DSSU De-Staging

Re: [Veritas-bu] / + Cross All Mnt Pts Vs. ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES

2008-10-22 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
I have to disagree with the ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES being a good thing in some circumstances. I recently went from using ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES to specifying each of my disk slices (/, /usr, /var, /opt, etc.) and breaking them out with NEW_STREAM on my UNIX servers for a very simple reason. Using

Re: [Veritas-bu] Limit bandwidth

2008-10-21 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Yes there is (for NBU 6.5.X anyways), Under the Master/Media Server properties, click on the Bandwidth menu option and then you can put in the IP address you want to throttle. The value is in KB/sec so 2.5MB/sec would be 2500 KB/sec. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplicating Image

2008-10-20 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
I think what he means is that if he uses in-line copies, he loses one tape drive per in-line copy which due to the small backup windows would be a problem. I would seriously look into Storage Lifecycle Policies, because then you can configure a policy to do a backup at 8PM and then instruct the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplicating Large Images to Multiple Copies Fails After 20 Minutes

2008-10-20 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
What version of 6.5 are you running? 6.5.1? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 2:52 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Duplicating Large Images to Multiple

Re: [Veritas-bu] Media Administration - Automating Ejection of Duplicate Copies to be offsited

2008-10-20 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
The Enterprise Base license does NOT include vault. You have to purchase the Vault Base license which will then give you the 4 drives to start with. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffery Price Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 2:03

Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplicating Image

2008-10-17 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
If you're going straight to tape (i.e. not using disk staging) then you can use a Storage Lifecycle Policy to do this. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A Darren Dunham Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 10:50 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Vault licensing with 6.5

2008-10-07 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Generally you license the number of drives in the library that will be participating in Vaulting operations. The Base License gives you the Vault functionality plus 4 drives that can be used for vaulting purposes (in-line tape duplication, ejection, multiple catalog backups, etc.) Each

Re: [Veritas-bu] Storage Lifecycle Policies

2008-08-28 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
SLPs can essentially mimic all the functionality of vault without the nice reports that vault can generate. Though in order to use them, you have to have intelligent hardware (VTLs, AdvancedDisk, Tape Libraries, etc.) instead of dumb hardware (BasicDisk). You can pretty much craft the SLP to

Re: [Veritas-bu] Disc Staging Area Full

2008-08-25 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
It would be far better to do a catalog search for the images in question and have netbackup expire them immediately. Manually deleting the image files (even if they will expire in a few days) can have unintended consequences especially for catalog consistancy. Once the images are expired,

Re: [Veritas-bu] sgscan cannot see robot after library power cycle

2008-08-22 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Have you run a devfsadm? Also, what Solaris kernal are you running? There was an issue with a patch that basically destroyed the sg driver. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl Rossing Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 11:31 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Calendar Schedules over Midnight 6.5.2 issue

2008-08-21 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
The single most important thing to remember with calendar based backups is that after midnight, it's a new day So consider these scenarios: You have a backup job which kicks off every Friday, and the backup window opens at 6PM and closes at 6AM the following day. The job queues, starts

Re: [Veritas-bu] Calendar Schedules over Midnight 6.5.2 issue

2008-08-21 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
, Matt R [EQ] wrote: The job queues, starts, runs into an issue and re-queues itself except this time doesn't get to start until after midnight Here is where the Retries Allowed after Runday checkbox comes in. Thanks Matt for that wonderful explanation. Just to clarify... so what was the real

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows 2008 Client

2008-08-19 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
I doubt it. The OS Compatibility Matrix says that for Windows 2008, the minimum client is 6.5.2... Now, you MIGHT be able to use 6.5.1, but I doubt it. I'm pretty sure that there will be code changes introduced with the 6.5.2 client that allows it to work under Windows 2008. If you have a

Re: [Veritas-bu] Media server installation

2008-08-18 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Well, why can't he set something up like this: Media Server #1: Library Control + 4 Drives Media Server #2: Library Control + 4 Drives Media Server #3: 4 Drives with Media Server #2 being the remote host controlling the library You don't need anything special to do this (such as the SSO).

Re: [Veritas-bu] Media server installation

2008-08-18 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
#2 and that the drives are controlled by media server #3. This robot can then be added to Storage Unit groups or policies, etc From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2008 1:00 PM To: Clausen, Matt R [EQ] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; veritas

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.2A media server with 6.5.1 master server

2008-08-18 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
According to both Symantec support and Symantec Education Services you can't run a media server at a higher patch revision then the master. The order of upgrading needs to be (in this order): master server(s) -- media server(s) -- client(s). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.1 - Queued DSSU Duplications

2008-08-15 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
I actually had a call with Symantec on this issue a few weeks ago The destaging job would start, get maybe a few sub-jobs in and then just hang (or exit with a Status 50). To make a long story short, I had to do some DB stuff with Symantec Backline Support on the phone and apply 6.5.2 in

Re: [Veritas-bu] MPT driver and SG

2008-07-22 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
Is the SL24 the FC or SCSI one? Generally though once the device is available to the OS, NetBackup should be able to use it. The MPT Driver problem listed here is more of a Solaris 10 issue then a Solaris 8 issue, so you should be fine. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Unable to write to both drives

2008-07-17 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
I just ran into something similar. I had a Storage Unit Group that consisted of two libraries with two tape drives each, but only one library would ever get used. I ended up having to remove all the Storage Unit Groups that had these libraries in them, recreate them and then make sure the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Strange schedule problem

2008-07-17 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
I remember running into a problem when I was still running 6.0 (MP1 or 2 - been awhile) where it would just stop doing scheduled jobs out of the blue. This was a standalone master/media server, but in order to get it working again I had to stop/start all the NetBackup processes. I ended up

Re: [Veritas-bu] Master/Media server input

2008-07-10 Thread Clausen, Matt R [EQ]
I've seen a couple of whitepapers out there on them, but the Sun Enterprise T5220 servers seem to scream as a media server. I'm actually redoing my NetBackup environment as well and I'm going to a Dedicated Master Server + 3 Media Servers (each Media server in a different location). My master