Might be a long shot, but a few weeks ago, we had a major issue w/
errors relating to Networking. Came to find out that the antivirus we
were running was causing the issue, check that out as well, we had
McAfee 8.5 patch 4. I have the tech note that McAfree sent to us to
resolve the issue.
I believe the clients also talk to the master regardless of what type of
backup you are running. The ports are open by defaults to enable that
communicate to happen. I am not sure if there is a separate port for
archive backups, what version of NBU are you running? Might want to
engage a
Funny you asked the question as I am going thru the same procedure. DPM
is really targeted to the smaller - midsize environment they are by no
means an enterprise backup / recovery tool. Gartner group has CommVault
and Symantec rated as one two respectively. DPM has it's limitation
such as it
Information for my NBU colleagues.
We came across something in our environment about a month or more ago
where we had a very large number of jobs fail with various network
related issues. And it was random clients or random media servers. We
went thru and upgraded our backup infrastructure,
I support a large backup infrastructure 10 media servers 1 master with a
remote site intergraded into ours. Over 1000 clients. Our fulls are
typically in the neighborhood of 30tB, daily incrementals are typically
around 8tb. Using a HP ESL712e w/ 20 LTO3 drives, utilizing SSO.
Mutiplexed
We just did the same thing, but fortunately for me the two different
sites had different media prefixes so I got lucky. The only issues we
ran into was getting the other site's library to intergrate
successfully, but it wasn't that big of a deal. If you are running
vault, you will need to
NBU environment:
Totally Windows 2003 Ent all media servers have 4 gig of ram
Fiber NICs (NC6136)
NBU 6.0 MP4
Am running into an issue where I am getting a large number of
incomplete jobs. And they all seem to be from a single media server.
I have gone thru three different Symantec
Actually I just received this link from Symantec who state Free
Download. This is what they use to analyze the network...I know
because right I am running into an Network utilization overload I am
guessing.
http://apparentnetworks.com/sas/310.
Thanks
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have multiple drives (D: / E: etc etc) you can try
multistreaming. NBU will take each one of those drive letters and
create child jobs and will run each child job simultaneously as compared
to sequential.
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: kjbaumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Running NBU 6.0 MP4 across the board, totally Windows. let's say you
have a full job scheduled to run on Friday, say 5:00pm start window.
And you also have Monthly jobs set up scheduled to run on the last
Friday of the month with the same start window (5:00). Is NBU smart
enough to take a look
Very good...thanks for the info.
Thanks
Dan
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 4:17 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Quick question
The scheduler will schedule one job per window
I can tell you that I am backup 4 servers that are over 4TB in size, we
are now multistreaming, but at one time we were not and the jobs
eventually did finish (4days).
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Michael Graff Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007
What are the differences between the following Media Status:
Suspended MPX
Frozen Suspended Full MPX
Frozen Suspended MPX
Frozen MPX
Frozen
I know media will go to a frozen state if there was a hardware issue.
But what about the other categories?
Thanks
Dan Cruice
This
Also forgot to mention, for Tip #2. Stop and Disable the Removable
Storage Management service. Under Manage computer / Services.
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:45 AM
To: 'Justin Piszcz'; X_S
Cc: VERITAS-BU
We have had similar issues. What type of Library are you running and
what type of servers (HP) / What OS? Here are a few tips I received
from HP.
Tip 1. Disable Tape Device Polling.
Start -- Settings -- Control Panel -- HP Management Agents
-- click on the Storage tab, check Disable
Yea...we were having issues where a drives would lose a path for no
apparent reason, we also had a drive once or twice just simply
disappear. So we have had luck with it. Another tip HP filled us in
on, is with persistent bindings, there is no sense on have your robot
control host having
Anyone using VxSS? I have a totally Windows Environment running NBU 6.0
MP4...dedicated network, master / media servers are all in workgroups
and clients are controlled via Host files residing on the Master / media
servers. My environment is shared between two separate groups (call it
group X
Good luck...I don't believe this is supported in any of the current
releases of NBU. I highly suggest you contact Symantec on this one, do
not just do it or you are going to run into a boatload of issues.
Thanks
Dan
From: Jimenez, Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November
Any idea where this setting is adjusted...on the client side or the
media server side?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); Veritas-bu
restores. True? If so that won't work, I get
individual file restores all the time for these servers.
Thanks
Dan
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 1:57 AM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
Good info...thanks Tom...Something I'll look into. Now does anyone have
a sizing recommendation for DSSU. Right now the business retention for
fulls (10tb) (Once a week) is 30 days, and Incrementials (running about
.5 - 1TB per day) is also 30 days.
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
The setup...
Client:
Windows 2003 Svr
6 TB of very small files...Word, Excel etc
NBU environment
6.0 MP4
all Windows...media and master node.
LTO3 drives SAN Attach (FC)
Mutlistreaming enabled
1GB isolated network
Multiplexing enabled, and don't laugh it is set to 20...I know I
Well, I have a dilemma and need my fella NBU guys to provide me some
ammo. My management is looking into alternative backup solutions. I am
ok with looking at other vendors that specialize in one or two
products...we are looking into CommVault and dare I say it...Microsoft's
Data Protection
What was the reason?
Thanks
Dan
From: Bobby Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 3:20 PM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] 6.5 Training is cancelled
One of my co-workers was registered for the 6.5 NB Admin on Solaris
class.
He
I am still battling with my Error 13's...I have tried everything short
of replacing the nics...things I have done...
Updated NIC drivers...
Turned off Multistreaming...
Tried moving to VSS (this worked on one of my servers)
Tried moving one of the affected servers to a new media server.
I
Agent DB backup works fine.
Paul
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: November 5, 2007 1:21 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 13 update
2000-client / 8 media server environments I
cared about at the time.)
--
gabriel rosenkoetter
Radian Group Inc, Unix/Linux/VMware Sysadmin / Backup Recovery
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 215 231 1556
From: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
A totally Windows Environment, I came in this morning an found two bad LTO3 in
my ESL712e Library, and all my drives under Activity Monitor à drives are list
as AVR for the Control...what is this and how do I get rid of it?
Thanks
Dan Cruice
This message (including any attachments)
A good ole fashion reboot seems to have cleared my problem…
Thanks
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:53 PM
To: Paul Keating
Cc: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
Say you have over 900 clients to backup from 5:00pm - 8:00am...20 LTO3
tapes drives in a library. 99% of the environment is Windows including
my media servers / Master node and I am running multiplexing (20) in
some cases. Right now 90% of all my jobs kick off at 5:00 on the dot.
Seems that many
6.5 is being consider a new release, however 6.5 is using the same
database as 6.x so there is no database merge as with 5.x to 6.x.
From what I understand the install is rather painless, and runs thru
very much the same way as a MP install did. Symantec has changed the
way they are labeling
Anyone have an idea how to fix an Error 13? Totally windows
environment.
10/23/2007 4:40:55 PM - Error bpbrm(pid=5400) socket read failed, An
existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (10054)
10/23/2007 4:40:56 PM - Error bpbrm(pid=5400) could not send server
status
Below is how we have our nbmail.cmd, about 30 lines down is the only
thing you will need to modify, however nbmail relies on blat so if you
can't use blat, you may be SOL...
@REM $Header: nbmail.cmd,v 1.3 2003/06/25 18:07:46 $
@REM
@REM bcpyrght
@REM
the trick. So now I turn to my fella NBU friends are there any
gotcha's or issues with MP5 and does anyone know how long it has been
out?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:20 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc
Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Need some help
6.0MP5 has problems if you use a compressed catalog and there are other
issues as well.
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:
Well...my issue is not resolved, I have gone to the extent
Can your master server see your Virtual Center server? Assuming you
have a Virtural Center server. Be sure you can at least ping it.
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: frankm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:46 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
? Keeping in mind I can lose those images.
Yea...this is fun..
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: BOGAC DAGDEVIR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:04 AM
To: Nardello, John; Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); Preston, Douglas L;
Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu
I have an open case w/ Symantec, and they have NOT said it is
impossible...at least not yet!!!
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Preston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 4:27 AM
To: Justin Piszcz; Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu
You will need to go to 6.5 if you plan to backup the Storage groups via
NBU, MS changed the database layout, now as to how to:...not quite sure,
however what we have been doing to get around this in the meantime is
creating a ntbackup job (assuming you have enough space) and backing up
the SG
I rebuilt two media servers and renamed one. And no like a dope I did
not following the retiring the media server whitepaper that Veritas so
gracefully wrote. So now I have an issue.
My entire Master / media servers are Windows 2003 6.0 MP4. The issue I
am having is getting all the media
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:04 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Need some help
Hm..
Put the old one back and do it properly OR..
Use:
(workaround
, 2007 3:20 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Need some help
That sounds right, do a test restore to make sure it works!
Justin.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:
Old one back in is not an option
but then it lets you
remove
the old media server/tape drives (at least in Linux).
Justin.
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007, Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills) wrote:
It works fine, but the I can't get rid of the old media servers from
the
Devices Hosts. They are offline / deactived, but when I go to
delete them I
Yea...I figured that...but there has to be a way to clean out the EMM
database...
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Preston, Douglas L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 4:10 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu
I have a similar question...I think
I have retired three media servers, well actually rebuilt two with new
names and new IP and renamed the third...(All Windows 2003 NBU 6.0 MP4)
I know NBU does not like renaming...and no like a dope I did not follow
the retire media server documentation. Lesson
Anyone running a Windows 2003 Master server node as a VM?
Is this even supported by Symantec...
Thanks
Dan
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you
are not the intended
Something else worth looking at is datadomain...we just had a rep come
is a review it with us, we are looking to try to get a demo box in here.
Might be a little cheaper the PureDisk especially, since Symantec has
changed the priceing of their product. I believe they are moving to a
per data size
Any gotcha when you did the upgrade? Are you running it in
production? Or Dev / QA?
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Preston, Douglas L [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:58 PM
To: Mike Kiles; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU
As far as the reporting tools, NBU 6.5 will break Bocada. Not sure why,
but we had Bocada in here last week discussing our options, and they
simply said Bocada will break. And they would not give us a ETA as to
when they will have NBU 6.5 support for Bocada. But they did say they
are working on
November
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Dmitri Smirnov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:50 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5 MP1 - When?!
Anyone know when MP1 for 6.5 will be published? I believe the latest
Ohh the infamous question...well w/ 6.5 you now get BMR for free and 6.5
will support Exchange 2007 backups...good things...and from what I was
told by Symantec (take it as you will) is 6.5 is using the same engine
as 6.0 so the upgrade is not as pain full as 5.x to 6.0 prior MP1. They
packaged
Couple of questions:
Keeping in mind my environment is 100% Microsoft, no UNIX / LINUX.
Currently running NBU 6.0 MP4
Is there a way to just backup ACLs of a folders / subfolder?
Is there a way to determine from a previous backup what the permissions
were to a particular folder?
When
Looking for some information regarding tape encryption, anyone out there
using it? And if so what kind of tape degradation did you experience.
We are being asked to implement it and we are just trying to figure out
what we are going to need. Our environment is mixed with Windows and
UNIX, all of
still get all the backups done with the window.
Thanks
Dan
-Original Message-
From: Austin Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 4:59 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Tape encryption
I
We had a very similar situation where we have backups running for 3
days. We were getting very good thru put but just the volume of data
getting backed up was killing us. We had Mutliplexing enable which
helped but still running for days. We just implemented Multisteaming on
our bigger servers,
.
Thanks
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 2:50 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Error 41
What OS is on your
It's hit or miss on them...They are not new w/ regards to ESX, probably
about 6 months old.
Thanks
Dan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 3:09 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills)
Cc: veritas-bu
I am pretty new to the whole NBU environment, pretty much got involved
w/ 6.0MP4 so I missed the fun of the 6.0 roll-out. What is the
consensus w/ 6.5? Even thought it was just released, what is the
comfort level within the NBU environment? Do you guys think this
release will be minimal with
for August 23rd. And according to her that release date
has been published.
Thanks
Dan
From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 10:18 AM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); Steven L. Sesar; Ed Wilts
Cc: veritas-bu
6.5 does have a LINUX client...
Thanks
Dan
From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:15 PM
To: Jeff Lightner
Cc: Martin, Jonathan; Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE
]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:27 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); Steven L. Sesar
Cc: Martin, Jonathan; Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question
6.0 (and 5.1 and probably earlier) have Linux clients but they're
aimed at RedHat
When performing a synthetic full, what should I use, a differential
Incremental or a cumulative incremental?...and why?
Thanks
Dan Cruice
Deloitte Technology Service
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Direct: +1 610-479-5179
Fax: +1 610-479-6179
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right now we are running Incrementals to disk and tape the same w/ the fulls.
Thanks
Dan
From: rcarlisle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 4:19 PM
To: Cruice, Daniel (US - Glen Mills); VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE
I have a backup that was running for 3 + days. I've instituted
multisteaming which took that 3 day backup down to 21 hours. Now within
that same policy I have Fulls and Incrementials, Now my Incrementials
that at one time took about 45 minutes to an hour are now running for 24
hours plus, Why
64 matches
Mail list logo