Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU 7.5.0.6

2013-07-07 Thread Daniel Otto
Hey Dave Haven't seen any issues to date. Lots of folks looking at that release to support windows 2012 I'll check the BCE emails in the AM and pass on any gotchas :) Hope all is well Dan O Sent from my iPhone On Jul 7, 2013, at 12:36 PM, dgwhittemore nbu-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:

Re: [Veritas-bu] netbackup 6.5: socket read failed ??

2011-11-16 Thread Daniel Otto
Bingo you have a reverse lookup failing for the incoming IP address 192.168.x.x. On the client run the command- C:\Program files\VERITAS\netbackup\bin:bpclntcmd -ip 192.168.x.x (The actual IP address I assume not x's) It will fail. Then in the client's host file add that IP and the master

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpcd 13782 - drops connection from master server

2011-09-16 Thread Daniel Otto
If the resolutions are correct and you can ping the server then either bpcd port 13782 is not listening or there is something such as client firewall or a TCP wrapper blocking access to the port if you are not getting a bpcd log generated. Try this- telnet localhost 13782 Does that generate

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpcd 13782 - drops connection from master server

2011-09-16 Thread Daniel Otto
That is what you should get and proves the binary is executable. Did you get a log from the telnet localhost 13782?? Is this a Solaris 10 server?? Try starting bpcd in standlone mode- e.g. /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/bpcd -standalone Then can you connect?? See if these TN helps- Assuming it

Re: [Veritas-bu] Where is my IP hiding?

2011-06-02 Thread Daniel Otto
Also you may have to clear the arp tables on the servers and networking switches. If you wait a few minutes they should timeout after about 5 minutes to an hour depending on the cache age settings for the CAM tables. e.g. mac-address-table aging-time default 5 minutes -Original

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Not Using Backup NIC

2011-03-18 Thread Daniel Otto
Both NICs are on the same IP segment. addr:172.20.10.23 Mask:255.255.255.0 addr:172.20.10.24 Mask:255.255.255.0 As far as the OS is concerned they are on the same dedicated segments with equal weight (Metric:1) in the routing table and probably binding to eth0 first. Run bpclntcmd -self to see

Re: [Veritas-bu] could not set TCP_NODELAY on socket 1724, h_errno = 10038

2010-07-28 Thread Daniel Otto
Increase the storage size for VSS to unlimited- After upgrading to NetBackup 6.5.4, adjustments may be made to Windows VSS settings that lead to individual snapshots being deleted unexpectedly on a Windows client. This affects snapshots that are taken outside of NetBackup manually or with a

Re: [Veritas-bu] How to configure Netbackup 6.5 admin console to w/5.1mstr?

2010-07-26 Thread Daniel Otto
How to administer multiple versions of NetBackup when using the NetBackup Java Console. http://support.veritas.com/docs/301343 Administering mixed version of NBU Master - To admin a Master Server running NBU 5.1 Then run JAVA in the same version: # jnbSA -r 5.1 - To admin a

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up through NAT

2010-05-20 Thread Daniel Otto
So long as they are only doing a static one to one NAT it should work but you need to make sure you are resolving the outside global NAT-ed IP address to the correct hostname. And if they are NAT-ing into the network from the DMZ you need to make sure the inside IP addresses are translated to the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Process Flow for Netbackup 6.5

2009-12-21 Thread Daniel Otto
See page 586 in the link below- ftp://exftpp.symantec.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Serv er/290230.pdf From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Reynolds, Susan K.

Re: [Veritas-bu] Command line question

2009-09-25 Thread Daniel Otto
The command line equivalents for running the NetBackup reports available in the NetBackup user interface http://support.veritas.com/docs/247902 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: [Veritas-bu] Command line question

2009-09-25 Thread Daniel Otto
FYI- Done- From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:jlight...@water.com] Sent: Friday, September 25, 2009 9:34 AM To: Daniel Otto Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Command line question Wow - quick service. : - ) Thanks. From: Daniel Otto [mailto:dan_o...@symantec.com

Re: [Veritas-bu] NETBACKUP WITH ENCRYPTION OPTION

2009-08-07 Thread Daniel Otto
When you use NBU client side encryption it removes any repeatable patterns that the tape drive hardware compression works off. So there is nothing to compress and so you end up using more tape space. The only way to get around this issue is to also run with client side compression since NBU will

Re: [Veritas-bu] Keep getting 58 errors

2009-08-03 Thread Daniel Otto
See if this help with your issue- STATUS CODE 58: Can't connect to client. Troubleshooting procedures for Status 58 errors. http://support.veritas.com/docs/321172 -Original Message- From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On

Re: [Veritas-bu] Keep getting 58 errors

2009-08-03 Thread Daniel Otto
Do you have a bpcd log from the client? If not, create a bpcd log on the client to tell if the NBU server is even getting to the client. If a log is not generated when you try something like connecting to the client's host properties or a telnet to the client on the bpcd port 13782 then you are

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Catalog Location

2009-06-24 Thread Daniel Otto
You can compress the catalog to recover disk space. But be aware it can cause delays in restores because of having to uncompress the catalog. In the master server host properties there is a number of days to compress catalog setting. If you typically don't do restores beyond a certain time frame

Re: [Veritas-bu] Encryption and compression

2009-05-22 Thread Daniel Otto
You are correct. When using client side encryption all the repeatable patterns hardware compression works off of is removed therefore there is nothing for the drive to compress. So you can end up using more tape space. The only solution is to disable hardware compression or also enabled client

Re: [Veritas-bu] (no subject)

2009-04-01 Thread Daniel Otto
See if this helps- STATUS CODE 58: Can't connect to client Troubleshooting procedures for Status 58 errors. http://support.veritas.com/docs/321172 From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 5.1Mp4 with Mcafee 8.5 or 8.0 - windows 2k3 freeze the windows server

2008-12-05 Thread Daniel Otto
This is a known issue with McAfee 8.5 with patch 3 or 4. I believe they have a fix in either the 6 or 7 patch. NetBackup Services are randomly shutting down on Windows servers. http://support.veritas.com/docs/295599 http://support.veritas.com/docs/295599 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Veritas-bu] Limit bandwidth

2008-10-21 Thread Daniel Otto
Is there a way to throttle or limit VERITAS NetBackup (tm) so it will not use all available bandwidth on the network? http://support.veritas.com/docs/265707 http://support.veritas.com/docs/265707 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: [Veritas-bu] Java Comsole Hungs with Netbackup 6.5.2A

2008-10-15 Thread Daniel Otto
See if this helps- How to prevent the Java administration console from hanging when accessing host properties http://support.veritas.com/docs/293857 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of madhusb Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 10:23 PM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.x firewall ports - Help!

2008-10-02 Thread Daniel Otto
See my answers below -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Peacock Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:38 AM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup 6.x firewall ports - Help! OK...I read through the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows GUI, NBU 6.5, and a firewall

2008-09-05 Thread Daniel Otto
VERITAS NetBackup (tm) 6.0 Port Usage Guide for Windows and UNIX Platforms http://support.veritas.com/docs/281623 Check page 17 in the link above. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dennis Peacock Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 4:42 PM

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backing up Leopard clients - OS X 10.5

2008-05-13 Thread Daniel Otto
I don't believe support for 10.5 comes out until NBU 6.5.2. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of pagarodog Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 3:48 PM To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-bu] Backing up Leopard clients - OS X 10.5

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpbkar: ERR - bpbkar FATAL exit status =40: network connect

2008-01-16 Thread Daniel Otto
Warning- Auto negotiation rant ahead.- Auto negotiation was meant for the virtual office where you do not know what type of Nic is being used by the end user. But in environments where you typically know what type of NIC is being used you should hard code the both the NIC and switch ports. A

Re: [Veritas-bu] Jumbo Frames

2007-10-19 Thread Daniel Otto
Using Jumbo framing Using jumbo framing can improve performance but if not implemented correctly you can quickly go from poor performance to worse. You first need to make sure the NIC driver supports using jumbo framing. And when deploying you must make sure all devices on the layer 2 side of

Re: [Veritas-bu] Veritas 6 upgrade

2007-07-11 Thread Daniel Otto
FYI- There will be soon posted a 5.x to 6.5 upgrade portal and a 6.0 to 6.5 upgrade portal on the software support web site. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clem Kruger (C) Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 3:46 AM To: WEAVER,