Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s

PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Edson Noboru Yamada *Sent:* Saturday, October 06, 2007 6:35 AM *Cc:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s SUN V40z with SOlaris is not an option for NBU Server

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s

Netbackup. Also if anyone is curious we have tested the VMS client and it works fine. -- *From:* Edson Noboru Yamada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, 5 October 2007 11:00 AM *Cc:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup

Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solaris

I dont think so. Sun machines are very, very expensive. With the same (or less) amount of money you can buy an excellent Intel based machine (with more memory, more CPUs etc) and Linux with a so much better performance. I see no difference in support from Veritas for Solaris or Linux. My

Re: [Veritas-bu] 10GB network + perf questions etc

Hi I have 3 media servers running with a 10 GbE NIC (alll running RHEL4). Two of them use a Intel NIC, and the other uses a NC-510F (NetXen chipset). We use 3 different server models: a Sun V40Z, a IBM x366 and a HP DL580 g4. On my opinion, Intel(or AMD)+Linux machines have a so much better

[Veritas-bu] Maximum number of policies

Hi I have an NBU 5.1 installation with one master server (Solaris 9) and 6 media servers (RHEL4, Windows 2003). I´ve just created the 101st policy. The problem I´m running into is that apparently the scheduler is simply ignoring the backup window configured (it was supposed to start at 8pm but

Re: [Veritas-bu] Maximum number of policies

Noboru Yamada *Sent:* July 20, 2007 6:43 AM *To:* Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu *Subject:* [Veritas-bu] Maximum number of policies Hi I have an NBU 5.1 installation with one master server (Solaris 9) and 6 media servers (RHEL4, Windows 2003). I´ve just created the 101st policy. The problem I

Re: [Veritas-bu] Exclusions

Have you tried this? *mp3 hth On 1/8/07, Martin, Jonathan (Contractor) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to figure out how to exclude a certain file suffix from all backups on a certain Linux/Unix client. Say *.mp3. In testing, creating *.mp3 doesn't work, nor does /*.mp3. I think the

Re: [Veritas-bu] Backup speeds Windows servers

A important thing to consider is file system fragmentation and number and size of files, which may impactseverely on performance. In order to check this, try to create a single big file (2 GB, for example) and create a test policy to backup only that file. Under normal conditions, on a idle

Re: [Veritas-bu] Trunking in solaris...

By the way, we've tried to test SunTrunk using a 4-processors V480 with 8GB RAM, but without success. The CPU consumption easily reached to 100% but with the network bandwidth lower than 1, 1.2 Gbps. SUN support was simply patetic (and worse, very expensive). So, the bottom line: it's not any

Re: [Veritas-bu] Duplications running very slow

Hi Duplication is a restore + backup; if your duplication is slow, it´s very likely that the restore operation is the culprit (maybe because the MPX). If possible, try to backup to a disk. Restores (and dups) are so much faster using this kind of media. hth On 11/13/06, Delgado, Jess J CIV

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpbkart on unix

, Portsmouth, PO3 5PU Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dave Markham [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 07 November 2006 10:27 To: Edson Noboru Yamada Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] bpbkart on unix Getting 128kb from one client over a 100mbit

Re: [Veritas-bu] bpbkart on unix

You can use the unix time command to measure how long a bpbkar to /dev/null takes (googlebpbkar /dev/null and you should see the exact syntax).What do you mean by slow? How many MB/s are you getting? edsonOn 11/6/06, Dave Markham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone point me in the direction of a doc

[Veritas-bu] Memory usage under rhel 2.1

Hi,I have a media server (NBU 5.1 MP4) running under RHEL 2.1 AS.The server is a SUN V40Z with 8GB RAM. There are 6 LTO2 tape drives attached to it.Under normal circunstances, each job is recorded on two tapes simultaneously (on and off-site copy). My question is regarding the memory usage, which

[Veritas-bu] Backup to disk -- performance?

Hi, We´ve been asked to examine a backup to disk solution (rather than the traditional backup to tape). It´s clear that restores are so much faster, but one point I still don´t understand it´s about backup performance: LTO2 drives can support a throughput like 50 MB/s or even more;