Also, since you are on 6.5 look at lifecycle policies.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Preston
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 1:15 AM
To: Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] clone or duplicate tape
Without
licensing of NB Enterprise these days.
No?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Lightner
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 6:34 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; Curtis Preston; Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] clone
Yes, they still work.
Yes, the directory does not exist on a media server. So you do have to
create it.
Also create the bptm log directory and use that information from that to
play with the size of the buffers and number of buffers.
Remember to set BPTM_VERBOSE = 5
-Original
Mike,
Last January, I implemented a VTL (EMC CDL720) with 35 usable TB. We
did much study on the multiplex issue in most instances the backup did
perform faster when it was not multiplexed, but with out a doubt the
restore AND duplications speed is around 4 times as fast. So, I am
working
I upgraded from 5.1 to 6.5 in Oct 2007. It was a very smooth update
that worked really well.
I did all my prework and made sure that my catalog was in sync. I had
no bad tape entries in the database.
I also upgraded my WHOLE environment in a 12 hour window. I started
with my master server
Renee,
I just select them thru the GUI and make sure that uncheck the box
Verify media label before performing operation. You can do multiple
tapes, I have select over 50 tapes and no problem.
This will work on 5.1 and 6.x
Kevin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, you right click on the media.
Select label, then the next box will have the check box.
I only use the JAVA GUI Only Solaris here!
From: rcarlisle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:28 PM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu
A shameless plug for your book, but no special discount code for us
fellow backupcentral people? ;-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Curtis
Preston
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:52 PM
To: Rosenkoetter, Gabriel;
Yep, you can not use the 6.5.x GUI with 5.x
You have to install the old GUI for any 5.x servers.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hudson,
Steve
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:26 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Yes, you can install the both versions of the GUI on a desktop. Check
the install manual from Veritas, it explains the whole thing.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Lightner
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:36 AM
To: [EMAIL
To: Kevin Whittaker; Jeff Lightner; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU 6.5.1
We tried that and it didn't work. I will relook at it... Thanks for the
input Guys
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Whittaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
I would agree with Ed, that Aptare is a much better product them VBR.
Depending on your size, check out backupVISUAL. It is a very easy
product to learn and it was extremely simple to install.
Kevin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
I would agree with Justin. I have a DSSU of around 8TB sitting on a
CX600, with 15k drives in a SAN, and even with that the staging off will
slow down the backups enough to add around 6 hours to normally a 20 hour
backup.
You CAN do it, but you can also drag a 1000lb weight behind your car...
Alas, tis true!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cpreston
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:41 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5
I'm looking into whether or not this is true.
nope... that is gone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stump,
Bob A
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:56 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] sniff...bpgp is gone from 6.5
Somebody please check to see if
to figure out if this is a bad thing for them or good for them.
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Rusty,
Over a year ago, when I was on 5.1 MP3 I had 50 images to change the
retention on. I did initially try to run 4 of them at the same time
well, it did impact my master server pretty hard!
So, I just wrote a script that ran them back to back.
So, from my experience I would just run
Just relabel them.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Conner,
Mike
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 11:52 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Reusing Catalog Tapes
Hi, I have NBU 6.5.1 on Windows 2003 and want to
jobs manually.
Sometimes, I am working on the master server and bring up netbackup and
don't want any jobs to run.
Anybody have any ideas on how to do this?
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
Work: (813) 637-5502
Cell: (813) 810-6456
Len,
That worked great, but if I stop and start netbackup will it still be
suspended?
Kevin
From: Len Boyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 11:32 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu
I recently have been looking at a backup reporting tool, and I gave them
35 days of information for them to show me reports. Well, they came
back with my success rate average at 99.1%. I was told that was quite
high, most are in the 80s
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually that is not true. I have 7 robots (6 VTL and 1 physical). I
like to keep all the VTL robot tapes out of the scratch pool and it
worked fine in NB 5.1.
But since, I have went to 6.5, all unassigned tapes have ended in the
scratch pool. Even when I assign the tape to the other pool, it
.
Next, I need to make sure that they have no duplicate media ids. I
don't have to worry about duplicate host names.
Anybody ever do this? If so, any information would be appreciated.
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
Work: (813) 637-5502
Cell: (813) 810-6456
Don,
I had a very similar issue and it dealt with the location of the images.
My disk guys gave me more space and configured the /usr/openv file
system to be RAID 5 concatenated! So my catalog went from 1 hour to 5
hours! Well then relayed out the file system and now it is back down to
1 hour.
Yes, I have been doing this for over 2 years works great!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rongsheng Fang
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 6:02 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Vault reports and the ftp
Simon,
Almost 3 weeks ago, I upgraded my environment to 6.5 from 5.1. I have 1
solaris master, 6 HPUX media server, 19 Solaris Media servers, and 2
Windows media servers. I also run SSO.
Everything went very smooth. Just remember to delete all mention of any
server in the bp.conf that is NOT
be an option to turn this on, but I have yet to find
it on the website or within the Vault PDF.
Has anybody run into this? If so, what was the fix?
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
Work: (813) 637-5502
Cell: (813) 810-6456
with being required to cycle netbackup after changing the storage
unit.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Preston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 4:07 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; Mellor, Adam A.; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup
I am scheduled to upgrade from 5.1 to 6.5 and would be very interested
in the answer to this question. I checked the documentation and in the
Veritas NetBackup 6.5 Admin Guide for UNIX and Linux Vol 1 had the
answer... I think
On page 250: It says that the final destination storage unit will
Here is the link: http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290141.htm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clooney,
David
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 9:03 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU 5.x to 6
I went thru a time of changing retention length on some old backups in
5.1MP6 and it sounds similar to what happened to me.
I changed the retention period on the backup images and they expired and
deleted the images. Well the tapes seem not to clear up. I let them
sit for the day, and the
We have completed the upgrade from 5.1 to 6.5 on our Development/Test
area.
It went great, except for an issue with one of their media servers being
configured wrong.
Oh and let me add, that the color yellow makes the GUI look horrible!
Kevin Whittaker
I agree with Paul on this issue.
The same is true with the VTL that I currently use.
Kevin Whittaker
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 9:34 AM
To: Curtis Preston; Clem Kruger; VERITAS-BU
We have it on our plan. We will be using tape for only long term
retention of data.
Our plan is to purchase another EMC CDL, and mirror our existing EMC CDL
to the EMC CDL at our DR site. Our master server already is duplicated,
and this will allow us to start restores of stuff that is not
I have asked my account rep multiple times and been explained that I do
not have to license my VTL (EMC CDL720). Since it is presented as a
real robot to the OS, then NetBackup has no clue that it is not a robot.
So, there is not always a cost for the VTL, depending on how you do the
setup.
True, we do not have a limit to the number of tape drives.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Keating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:25 PM
To: Kevin Whittaker; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Cost of VTL vs DSU
This depends on your
I would agree, that is what I have seen happen. If one stream lags
behind it just skips putting it on the drive until it is ready.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin
Piszcz
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 7:19 AM
To: Clooney,
Should have been more clear. I mean till the buffer is full and it is
ready to write it to the tape.
-Original Message-
From: Clooney, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 7:59 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; Justin Piszcz
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Without that, just use vault to duplicate them and it is fine.
I use vault to duplicate from my EMC CDL720 to my L700.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Forester, Jack L
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 6:37 AM
To:
All,
I have a question about the upgrade on my media servers which have a
ORACLE database.
Will I have to take down the ORACLE databases and bring them back up to
recognize the library for the ORACLE to NetBackup interface?
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
I agree with Paul.
I am in the process of reading the 6.5 release notes, and I do see the VTL
direct to tape ability. Looks like a call to veritas will be necessary to
understand the setup.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
the client
software on a Solaris 8/9/10 box? Or a Linux server?
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
All,
Ok, I have a NetBackup 5.1MP6 environment with 27 Media servers that
only back themselves up usually for ORACLE databases.
I have 1 L700e with 11 9940B tape drives, and a EMC CDL720 which is a
virtual tape library.
I backup to the CDL and vault to the L700. I have always done the
to NetBackup 6.5 in Oct or Nov.
From: Rockey Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:08 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Reporting Tool for NetBackup
Kevin,
What data are you wanting
have done all the normal troubleshooting for 58 24 status codes but
nothing seems to work.
I can ping the master server from the core area and I can also do a
traceroute.
Anybody have any idea what I am missing?
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
getting the 58 and 29
status codes on the backup.
Kevin
From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:30 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question
I'm not sure
]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 11:44 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question
Ok... so
Host_1 -- Virtual Machine 1
Host_1 -- Virtual Machine 2
Host_1 -- Virtual Machine 3
Verify that Host_1 (in my example above) is in DNS
?
From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:06 PM
To: Martin, Jonathan; Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] VMWARE Backup question
No - I think he is saying he has no issues backing up the virtual
machines on top
This is not a ESX Server, I am being told it is only VMWARE Workstation.
From: Steven L. Sesar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 12:15 PM
To: Jeff Lightner
Cc: Martin, Jonathan; Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
with the other Windows server that has 2 network
cards!
Need to figure out how to build a static route on Windows!
From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:42 PM
To: Kevin Whittaker
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject
.
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
Systems Engineer - UNIX Admin
Work: (813) 637-5502
Cell: (813) 810-6456
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
You can use the command bpflist, it will tell you what was backed up.
Then a quick PERL or KORN to verify your file.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 12:56 PM
To:
, 2007 1:19 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange 2003 Information Store Backup Slow
Hi
Well my Ex2k3 is a SAN Media - get approx 60 - 80GB+ - I backup the
information store policy and it uses one drive.
You can use the * at the end to stream
: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:14 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Exchange 2003 Information Store Backup Slow
kevin
Forgot to ask, what sort of disks are the DB's on? High speed fibre, or
SCSI Internal drives or hot swappable?
Regards
Simon Weaver
they are
seeing, this will also help with the read performance. I will just have
to wait for them and be patience.
Kevin
From: WEAVER, Simon (external) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:32 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu
Whittaker
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Has anyone done benchmarking of any sort
with..
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007, Kevin Whittaker wrote:
Oh... Sorry about that.
That is the easy part.
Under the Schedule, within the policy, I changed the media
multiplexing to 1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:35 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Has anyone done benchmarking of any sort
with..
Yeah but specifically how did you get NetBackup to backup a separate
stream to each tape drive as that's
ways to do
the backup/restore.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 8:24 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Has anyone done benchmarking of any sort
with..
On Fri, 27 Jul
Recently I did quite a bit of benchmarking on restores with ORACLE RMAN
multiplexing.
We currently do 4 channels to 1 tape.
Our test backup was taking 39 mins, with a full restore time of 2 hours.
And we tested other channels, and it seems that the restore time is # of
channels times the backup
for the EMM
server?
Which is better?
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Does anybody know why they are recommending to put it on a different server?
From: rcarlisle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 11:43 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading to 6.x - EMM
to vault their own tapes.
From: Martin Ruslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 11:25 PM
To: Kevin Whittaker
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Max # of Drives on a Master Server?
I dont know for sure
it?
Kevin Whittaker
Syniverse Technologies
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Just an update, I went thru the db/images directory and removed all files
unrelated to NetBackup. it did not speed up the catalog backup at all.
From: Kevin Whittaker
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Clooney, David; Hampus Lind
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 9:50 AM
To: Clooney, David; Hampus Lind; Kevin Whittaker;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Catalog performence to tape
Could this have anything to do with a remote media server not responding
Of course it does. Every checkpoint requires that netbackup stop and put a
marker out there. IF I use checkpoint, I only will use 15 mins as the smallest
number.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David McWilliams
Sent: Monday,
I wish had an answer for you, but alas I have almost the same issue.
I am running Solaris 9, NB 5.1 MP6 with a catalog size of 40GB. The
catalog backup takes around 2.5 hours to backup. I even turned up
logging and found it spent all of it's time in the images directory.
I am even running
I have to agree, the issue is that they are opening the robot. There is
a reason that the CAP was created. Just insert the tapes into to the
CAP and run an inventory of the robot with the option to empty the cap
marked.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Ok, I am looking for help.
I am running a Solaris 9 master server, with 5.1MP3. I have 8 windows
servers that I backup, 3 of them are 2000, and 5 of them are on 2003
SP2.
Well, I setup the policy for each server to by ALL_LOCAL_DRIVES, and
also turned on Multistream/Multiplex.
So it kicks off
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:53 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Windows Backup of C drive slow
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Kevin Whittaker wrote:
Ok, I am looking for help.
I am running a Solaris 9 master server, with 5.1MP3. I
I will try it tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Justin Piszcz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:56 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Windows Backup of C drive slow
I would try it with VSS/VSP off first and see
From: Jeff Lightner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 8:25 AM
To: WEAVER, Simon (external); Kevin Whittaker;
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Windows Backup of C drive slow
UNIX admin here. How does one turn of VSP/VSS on Windows 2000/2003
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:21 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; Jeff Lightner; WEAVER, Simon (external);
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Windows Backup of C drive slow
You have to add the client to the list under Client Attributes, then go
over
for the stupid question I should have looked at that, but heck
it was right when I setup these policies.
Thanks for your help.
Kevin
From: Martin, Jonathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 10:04 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu
Richard,
What version of Vault do you have? I am running 5.1 MP3 and there is
no retention mapping within each vault profile.
I have to create a profile for each offsite retention period.
Just as an FYI, I use a KORN script to run all my vaulting, since I
also inject my tapes and run
Yes, creating the file /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list will work, but
it affects all backups done on that client
Better to create /usr/openv/netbackup/exclude_list.[policy name]
Kevin___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
to 12 for 2 week? If so, I can't send off that many
tapes... I will run out.
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Paul Keating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 1:48 PM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Vaulting Question
Sorry about that... The file would contain anything you don't want to
backup.
If I was trying to avoid backing up /export/home
I would add a line with /export/home
If I wanted to avoid all files that ended with dbf:
I would add a line with *.dbf.
And so on.
Kevin
Each media server keeps an error file.
/usr/openv/netbackup/db/media/errors
It will contain the information to see if the same tape is having a
problem. You can also see what tape drive it is failing on.___
Veritas-bu maillist -
We currently run NetBackup Enterprise Server 5.1MP3 with 11 SSO 9940B
tape drives (L700E) shared over 32 media servers. Everyone of our
ORACLE database servers are also SAN media servers, so their backups do
not go across the standard network. We have recently added a EMC CDL720
with 35TB and 8
and they say there is no license that would stop
me from running a certain amount of backups at a time.
Kevin Whittaker
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:49 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NB Enterprise Server 5.1 MP3 - Jobs are queuing
Is the problem during vaulting or during backup?
How are you sharing the 6 virtual robots among the 32 media servers?
Paul
. Is this a problem?
From: Paul Keating [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:59 AM
To: Kevin Whittaker; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NB Enterprise Server 5.1 MP3 - Jobs are queuing
so you have 6 virtual robots
83 matches
Mail list logo
