For the sites that have gone completely to disk, did you have to make
adjustments to your retention period(s) ? I'm also curious on how you're
handling your archival requirements ...
Thanks,
/Steve
--
Message: 1
Date:
Speaking of reimport, I've always found it a chore to find the media
containing expired images. I remember it being very easy in NetWorker (Legato)
as it was simply a matter of running a query of the backup which ID'ed the
media, then performing the required import. How does one do query part
Thanks guys (Jeff and Joseph) ... what you say regarding the restores make
sense. I suppose I went off on a tangent as this discussion reminded me of a
similar incident. We were surprised about the unexpected size of a client's
incrementals, and later discovered that the full had expired
I would have expected NBU to *keep* the info about the full backup until the
subsequent differentials/incrementals have expired, however, I believe that NBU
would determine that the cleaned out files from it's DB (expired) have not
been backed up, and include them in a subsequent incremental,
Can you turn on verbose logging on the affected filer and see what the logs say
? Also, from the filer, can you mount/rewind/etc a tape ? I'm curious about
this NBU msg:
Device serial number for device at path /dev/nrst1a does not match drive
adic_drv03
/Steve
snip
we have a
How are your tape storage units configured (just 1 for the 2 drives) ? Does the
queuing (for the allocated tape drive) happen only for the 6th job/class ?
/Steve
--
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 10:12:46 +0200
From: Hagman, Rob rob.hag...@centric.eu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Job is
This technote appears to match what you describe,
http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=contentid=TECH164532actp=searchviewlocale=en_USsearchid=1341160999890
Taking a look at the client bpcd log should also provide additional info if the
above technote isn't amatch.
/Steve
Sounds like the firewall (ipfilter ?) or tcpd (inetd) is blocking port 13782
from your master/media server(s). From your master, can you sucessfully telnet
using port 13782, to the Solaris10 client ? You mention telnet from the master
below, but just verifying that you used the bpcd port#.
Per the information, it appears to be media server related ...---NetBackup
status code: 10Message: allocation failedExplanation: The system memory
allocation fails because of insufficient system memory available. A possible
cause is that the system is overloaded with too many processes and not
It will be interesting to see how many sites here are using LTO5 drives, and
what their experience has been so far. With the greater throughput, are you
using morepowerful media servers ? Is there a way of using LTFS with NBU ?
/Steve
Any indications from the lights on the tapedrive before it's reseated ? Can you
get logs from the library ?
/Steve
From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 72, Issue 7
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:00:02 -0500
Send
Per the following (high-lighted), it appears that NBU cannot determine the
backup file specs ... Can we see what the filer logs show when this occurs ?
+++
1. Enable NDMP Debug Logging on the NetApp Filer by running the following
commands on the Filer:ndmpd debug screenndmpd debug 702.
Before the catalog restore, did your master see itself as a FQDN
(pbcobk01.intersil.com vs short name of PBCOBK01) ? Do you use the FQDN when
the master/media servers are registered ?
/Steve
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:21:07 -0400
What seems to stick out, is the target OS is 64bit (vs the original 32bit OS)
and the problem only shows up after a good catalog restore
/Steve
---
From: veritas-bu-requ...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Veritas-bu Digest, Vol 71, Issue 11
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
It'll be interesting to see how other sites are using LiveUpdate for Unix
and WinX clients. Also any positive/negatives would be appreciated.
/Steve
---
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Karl Rossing wrote:
Thanks Rob!
I managed to get it going by simply following Renee's instructions.
We noticed that on the new unix clients as well. They've added an rc
script (nbclient) for BMR and the san client.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, WEAVER, Simon (external) wrote:
Guys
I got clients that are SAN Attached client, but NetBackup is starting a
Service that is always failing on
We've found that if the files are within nested directories, DAR is
disabled, even if we choose ALL the files.
/Steve
---
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009, Marianne Van Den Berg wrote:
We got 'caught' by the same thing - found this in the NDMP Admin Guide:
Note File-level DAR is supported;
Hi,
I see this as well. I believe that's normal behaviour as the check for the
high water mark is done before it starts writing the image.
/Steve
--
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Say you have 4 clients, each have 10TiB of data on them.
For disk staging you only have 1TiB on each
I'm surprised about the locked in comment. Can you explain ?
We were a Legato NetWorker shop that was persuaded to go the Veritas NetBackup
route because of their pricing. Seems that they've gotten more expensive and
our
experience since NetBackup 6.0 didn't help either. Other backup vendors
notify the sender and delete this e-mail from your system.
Steve Quan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/01/2008 03:53 PM
To
Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu, BeDour, Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Legato vs. NetBackup
I'm surprised
Sure,
NUMBER_DATA_BUFFERS 64
SIZE_DATA_BUFFERS 262144
/Steve
---
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, NBU wrote:
Steve,
Can you share what is the Number / Size of data buffers set in your
environment.
+--
|This was sent by
We have Solaris10 master media servers here without any changes to
/etc/system but I'm also interested in what others are doing.
/Steve
---
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Dave Markham wrote:
I'd be interested in this too, as i'd heard you didnt need to bother
with /etc/system tuning in Solaris 10.
Is anyone using ZFS for this ?
/Steve
--
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Jeff Lightner wrote:
I second Ed's recommendation of Veritas Volume Manager (VxVM). Not
just for NetBackup but for most filesystems (including those for
terabyte databases). The options one has for controlling things such
as
I remember seeing comments about the advantages/disadvantages of a few
vendors' implementation of data deduplication but I can't find it :(
I'd appreciate comments from sites that have evaluated this.
Thanks,
/Steve
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
Hi,
Does anyone have an Aptare tutorial for newbies ? From the comments on
this list, I get the impression that it's very easy to use, however, I
seem to be having a tough time with it :(
Thanks,
/Steve
---
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, X_S wrote:
we started not too long ago with Aptare. so far
I second this request :) I see the occasional traffic, but it's mostly
about how great the product is :) :)
A similar format to this list would be nice.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, X_S wrote:
does anyone know of an aptare forum out there? i am a new user to aptare and
it would be nice
We have about 650.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Nardello, John wrote:
Since you've brought this to mind then, anyone want to reveal the
largest number of clients they're reporting on through Aptare ? Just
curious if some of our Aptare slowness is due to the several thousand
clients we
it at all.
Thank you,
Boris
On 11/1/07, Steve Quan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is also a BIG issue with us (over a terabyte). We'd hoped that doing
incrementals through transaction log backups would help (with the added
bonus of point in time restores), but that unfortunately, didn't help
This is also a BIG issue with us (over a terabyte). We'd hoped that doing
incrementals through transaction log backups would help (with the added
bonus of point in time restores), but that unfortunately, didn't help.
/Steve
---
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Bobby R Windle wrote:
Any one have any
/Steve
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Martin, Jonathan wrote:
I stand corrected. Curtis has all the answers and he's sitting on them.
=P
Worrying about multiplexing settings and tape failures? Come on, that's
about as soft a cost as you can dream up.
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
I ran a clean install and specified the name of the master server per the
prompts, installed/configured the sg driver and tape drives, then applied
MP4, and restarted everything (master and all media servers :)
/Steve
---
snip
Any unforseen issues or it went smoothly for you?
We did this (Solaris8 to Solaris10 media servers).
/Steve
---
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Quick question,
With NBU6.0MP4, since all is held on the master server, I can simply take
a media server out of service, re-format it, install RHEL5 and either
unpack/setup everything
We're running Solaris10 on our media servers (for about 3 weeks now).
/Steve
---
On Thu, 17 May 2007, Kenneth W Wilkinson wrote:
Anybody running Solaris 10 and NB6.0? Any issues you see with it?
kww
___
Veritas-bu maillist -
for months.everything worked fine till one fine day when
our load gradually, and unexpectedly crossed some random boundary.
Paul
Also contemplating Linux on Sun X-series hardware
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Steve Quan
Sent: May
Hi,
We've been wrestling with this for quite some time, and very curious to
see how other sites are managing their Lotus Notes backups. We're running
NBU6.0 MP4 (servers and clients). The database is just over 1TB and we do
transaction log backups.
Thanks,
/Steve
I've noticed the error 200's Fortunately, they stopped after a few days.
/Steve
---
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever since we upgraded to Netbackup 6.0MP4 on March 12 , we have started
seeing alot of what I call false 50 errors.
( we usually get these when we stop services on
Is there a newsgroup/forum I can go to for tips/hints on how others are
using Aptare with NetBackup ?
Thanks,
/Steve
--
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Hindle, Greg wrote:
Ok Thanks. This is a Aptare thing. Good I am trying to convince my
management here to buy this product.
Greg
snip
We had this one for the LONGEST while :(
/Steve
---
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Jerry wrote:
Not sure if any of you have been burned by this one,
but it surprised me today.
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/281780.htm
I found out that random fulls had been skipped for
months on my new
Take a look at doc 231959 (for versions lower than 6.0), nbemmcmd is used
for NBU6.0
/Steve
---
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Paul Keating wrote:
Very cool.
So just add that line to the vm.conf and bounce the daemons?
Thanks,
Paul
--
-Original Message-
From: Steve Quan [mailto
The latest nbpem binary we got (last night) seems to have corrrected our
scheduling problem. We'll be monitoring for the next couple of days.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:00:00AM +1000, Wilkinson, Tim wrote:
It may be an obvious question but I ask
Hi Justin,
Is the data coming directly from a SAN (vs network) or direct attach ?
Thanks,
/Steve
---
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Justin Piszcz wrote:
This is on an HP shelf connected via
06:01.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)
Hi,
Sure, I'd be interested.
/Steve
---
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Ray Schafer wrote:
I could set up a Webcast and go through an overview of BMR 6.0 -
actually running through how to set it up and configure it, and then
demonstrate some of the features including the configuration editor
(used to
Are there any local backup type groups in the Toronto, Canada area for
poor folks like me who can't travel ? :)
/Steve
---
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Paul Keating wrote:
Sounds like we've got some of the same interests..though I'm less
interested in the 5.x stream as we hope to be on 6.x by end
Hi,
Does the 4.5 FP8 client work on Solaris 10 ?
/Steve
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Can any of these tools monitor for restore tape mounts, *AND*
display a list of any additional tapes (with it's Volume
Group if it's not in the library) required ?
/Steve
---
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, King, Cheryl wrote:
That's what OpenView Operations (OVO) does. You run an agent on the
We're in the process of moving from our 4.5FP8 system to 6.0MP1
(everythin new). The major problem we're seeing, are ERROR 41's as
we start loading up the media servers. These would occur in
batches and appear on the more heavily loaded media server.
Any 6.0 environments out there experiencing
46 matches
Mail list logo
