Title: Message
or Diligent, STK, IBM, Copan
Systems, etc.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on behalf of Jim HoralekSent: Tue 8/1/2006 5:23 PMTo:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone
using VTL
Unfortunately no
one has answered Juan's question.
Any Data Domain,
Reo
-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
But why would you have to?
Just create more virtual drives on the VTL, and give each media server
its own drives.
Save some cash on SSO licenses, and buy more disk. ;o)
Paul
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi,
What do you think about VTL?
Are you using VTL? what model?
EMC DL710 or NetApp VTL600?
What about Storagetek?
Thanks in advance.
Juan
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Yes, we are. We currently have about 133TB of space using the NetApp
VTL600's.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan Pablo
Almeida
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:13 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Anyone
, 2006 9:13 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
Hi,
What do you think about VTL?
Are you using VTL? what model?
EMC DL710 or NetApp VTL600?
What about Storagetek?
Thanks in advance.
Juan
, August 01, 2006 9:47 AM
To: Liddle, Stuart
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
Hi Liddle,
Are you satisfied with this equipment?
Are you using compression enabled? What performance are you
obtaining?
How many TB are you writing
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Juan Pablo
Almeida
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:13 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
Hi,
What do you think about VTL?
Are you using VTL? what model?
EMC DL710 or NetApp VTL600
I agree with Jim. Inexpensive disk used along with disk staging and some tape is a much better value than buying a VTL that will emulate a robot and drives. Before you buy a VTL you really need to ask yourself what specific problem you are trying to solve.
johnOn 8/1/06, Jim Horalek [EMAIL
VTL
are expensive, however the limits I would disagree. We have a Sepaton (70+ Tb of
usable - note not RAW) and I believe the limits on the Sepaton is in
Petabytes.
Disk
Staging is a nice concept, however with that you are placing a lot of the
responsibility back on the admin.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
HowardSent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 1:34 PMTo:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone
using VTL
I agree with Jim. Inexpensive disk used along with disk staging and
some tape is a much better value
a new NBU
release
Anything else?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hall,
Christian N.Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:03 PMTo:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone
using VTL
Juan,
I would have to agree with John Howard on this. We
the moment.
:o)
Paul
--
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: August 1, 2006 3:30
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone
using VTL
I guess
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-01 14:29]:
I guess this begs the question to the audience and the people that have
put in VTL's ... what problems does a VTL solve that D2D can not?
I think the list so far is:
1. Administration is easier
2. Possibly performance
3.
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.eduSubject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Anyone
using VTL
Some
VTL products' de-duplication technology is eons beyond compression, with low
level pattern matching, etc, etc, enabling upt to 25:1 effective
"compression"
: [Veritas-bu] Anyone using VTL
Some VTL products' de-duplication technology is eons beyond compression,
with low level pattern matching, etc, etc, enabling upt to 25:1 effective
compression.
VTL allows you to pool disk on a single VTL that can be shared to multiple
media servers
15 matches
Mail list logo
