Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-14 Thread Paul Keating
vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting For us, that was an issue with Aptare not properly handling a cross reference of image ids. If you look at the job that's hanging around, drill down and see if there are any related jobids. What you will see is one of the jobs has valid data, but the other one has

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread Dietmar Inaebnit
NOM is not a reporting solution. As the name indicates it is just an operating manager with some limited report capabilities. For a real reporting a real reporting application is a must. The mostly common used reporting application for Netbackup in Europe is backupVISUAL. Boccada and Aptare are

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread ckstehman
Subject Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting I found NOM to be painfully buggy, and its reporting structure to be a little inflexible. That said, it does store everything in a SQL database, so with a little bit of work, you can get access to that and use any sql reporting software you

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread Paul Keating
-- -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, Katherine A The thing I really like about Aptare is it's *real time* capability. However, it does not give you *real time* data untill after the job has completed. In my

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:30:14AM -0400, Paul Keating wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, Katherine A The thing I really like about Aptare is it's *real time* capability. However, it does not give you

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread briandiven
] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:30:14AM -0400, Paul Keating wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greenberg, Katherine A The thing I really like about Aptare is it's *real time* capability

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread Paul Keating
] Sent: August 11, 2006 11:04 AM To: Paul Keating Cc: Greenberg, Katherine A; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting This statement is absolutely false. Bringing up the Command Center Dashboard, I can see the status of all of the running jobs

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread Ambrose, Monte
To: Ed Wilts Cc: Greenberg, Katherine A; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting I submit my sincerest apologies. I just searched through the interface to find the Command Center Dashboard. You are, in fact, correct. Hmmmit does seem however

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread Ed Wilts
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Paul Keating wrote: Hmmmit does seem however that there is one job from 2 nights ago, showing up in the CCD, as slow, running =12 hours, and possibly hung, however in Activity monitor, it's reported as 100% complete, status 0. Are you running NBU

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread Paul Keating
-Original Message- From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you running NBU 6.0 perhaps? Because it's seriously busted with regards to job status in the Activity Monitor... Oh hell no. I've check the processes from the CLI, and it's definitely not still running. ;o) I'm

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-11 Thread David Rock
* Paul Keating [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-11 15:15]: -Original Message- From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you running NBU 6.0 perhaps? Because it's seriously busted with regards to job status in the Activity Monitor... Oh hell no. I've check the processes from

[Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-10 Thread Hindle, Greg
Title: Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting We are looking at reporting software for Netbackup. We are looking at Storage Console from Aptare. But I understand 6.0 with Nom also has reporting built in. We are currently running 5.0 mp6 but are planning to upgrade to 6.0. Is anyone using NOM and

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-10 Thread David Rock
* Hindle, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-10 14:18]: We are looking at reporting software for Netbackup. We are looking at Storage Console from Aptare. But I understand 6.0 with Nom also has reporting built in. We are currently running 5.0 mp6 but are planning to upgrade to 6.0. Is anyone

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-10 Thread Greenberg, Katherine A
: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting * Hindle, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-08-10 14:18]: We are looking at reporting software for Netbackup. We are looking at Storage Console from Aptare. But I understand 6.0 with Nom also has reporting built in. We are currently running 5.0 mp6

Re: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting

2006-08-10 Thread Tristan Ball
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hindle, Greg Sent: Friday, 11 August 2006 4:19 AM To: NB List Mail Subject: [Veritas-bu] Aptare vs. NB 6.0 NOM reporting We are looking at reporting software for Netbackup. We are looking at Storage Console from Aptare