SLSIA >>> "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/7/2006 1:48:11 PM >>> I didn't start the thread Bob.
I also never said that Symantec WOULD do this but that they COULD do this. Notice the keyword "may" in my original sentence. My comment related to a possible outcome of the article and went to the title of the thread "fame at last" pointing out that there can be a downside to such "fame". If you really don't like reading off topic stuff then you wouldn't have read my second post. I'm entitled to my opinions. You're entitled to yours as well no matter how wrong they may be. Do you have stock in Symantec that requires you to take personal umbrage at such suggestions? -----Original Message----- From: bob944 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:33 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Jeff Lightner Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Fame at last. From some strange Oliver-Stoneish planet, "Jeff Lightner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > The downside to an article like this is that pinhead execs > instead of deciding to fix the problems may decide it is > better to suppress forums like this and start lawsuits for > libel to do that. and followed that gem with > I didn't say they had a good case for libel but rather that > they might try such a case to suppress a forum. I doubt the > people that sponsor most forums have deep enough pockets or > desire to get into a protracted legal wrangle just to continue > doing so. making these the two most irresponsible and uncalled-for statements I've ever seen in a peer-support mailing list. Perhaps we can get back to NetBackup instead of dreaming up conspiracy fantasies. _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu |
_______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu