On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Wilkinson, Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
0n Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:04:09PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
As always for big releases, check the upgrade portal. The 6.5 version
is at
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290185.htm
Now only if there
Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
Hello Mark
I have had the same issue, it is probably because of the way 6.5 allocates tape
drives, where a job get a certain tapes and not just one of free ones. I had a
case with Symantec where got some
, May 19, 2008 1:26 AM
To: Mark Glazerman
Cc: WEAVER, Simon (external); Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
Hello Mark
I have had the same issue, it is probably because of the way 6.5 allocates tape
drives, where a job get a certain
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 5:52 AM
To: Spearman, David
Cc: Michael Graff Andersen; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
Indeed, you've got us curious now!
On Mon, 19 May
n Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Mark Glazerman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
unless they have made a change to how NBU handles disk storage units in
6.5,
They did. An image on a DSU (not DSSU) can now span multiple storage units
within a group. I'm sure there were other changes but I'm too lazy
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Glazerman
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 8:34 AM
To: Justin Piszcz; Spearman, David
Cc: Michael Graff Andersen; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
I don't know if the nbrb.conf
0n Mon, May 19, 2008 at 08:48:08AM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
They did. An image on a DSU (not DSSU) can now span multiple storage units
within a group. I'm sure there were other changes but I'm too lazy to look
them up for you.
Is there a page that lists changes/feature etc for
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Wilkinson, Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a page that lists changes/feature etc for 6.5.1 ?
The release notes is a good place to start. The 6.5 release notes are at
0n Mon, May 19, 2008 at 09:04:09PM -0500, Ed Wilts wrote:
As always for big releases, check the upgrade portal. The 6.5 version is
at
http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/290185.htm
Now only if there was an RSS feed for the afforementioned upgrade portal :(
-aW
IMPORTANT:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of WEAVER, Simon
(external)
Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 1:02 AM
To: Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
I am in the process of going to 6.5.1 and will be interested in getting some
window !!
Mark
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *WEAVER, Simon
(external)
*Sent:* Tuesday, May 06, 2008 1:02 AM
*To:* Paul Keating; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Subject:* Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
I am in the process of going
speed,
which I would see as slightly more important.
Simon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Keating
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 1:52 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable
It still has some issues--but it is much more stable than either 6.0 or 6.5.
If I had known what we were going to go through moving to 6.0 than 6.5 I would
not have performed the upgrades. Within a few days after applying the 6.5.1
update I felt like I was released from Netbackup purgatory.
changes as
part of your upgrade.
Paul
--
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 28, 2008 4:20 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
I would have to say
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: April 28, 2008 4:20 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
I would have to say that I love 6.5.1. I have seen client
backup speeds increase by 7 times
ck up all of the processing power? Does each backup spawn a bpdbm
process? I have 70 Active backup jobs running right now, and 40 bpdbm processes running. Is it normal for that many bpdbm processes to be running? -- Mike Sponsler Northrop Grumman Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:15 AM, King, Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't been on the list in about a year due to other work load. I now
find the version of NBU we're running is only supported until
3/31/2008. We would like to upgrade to v6.5.1. Just checking for
opinions on that
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:15 AM, King, Cheryl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I haven't been on the list in about a year due to other work load. I now
find the version of NBU we're running is only supported until
3/31/2008. We would like to upgrade to
to tape.) Its gone
well enough that we're upgrading our primary datacenter next month.
-Jonathan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Wed 3/26/2008 8:05 AM
To: Ed Wilts
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU
/25/2008 12:32 PM
To
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
[Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
I haven't been on the list in about a year due to other work load. I
now find the version of NBU we're running is only supported until
3/31/2008. We would like to upgrade to v6.5.1. Just
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 7:52 AM
To: King, Cheryl
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
Cheryl
We have been running 6.5.1 in our test lab
] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
Cherly
thought 5.1 was supported til October 2008 ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of King,
Cheryl
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 4:15 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
I
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sounds like 6.0MP6 is the place to be or a lot of testing with 6.5.1
should be performed first ;-)
I did not say that. With *ANY* release, testing should be done, if
possible. I do not believe that 6.0MP6 is more stable
Lol. Thanks for the feedback and for getting the bugs out for us, over
the years.
From: Ed Wilts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 5:45 AM
To: King, Cheryl
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Is NBU v6.5.1 stable?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Justin Piszcz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sounds like 6.0MP6 is the place to be or a lot of testing with 6.5.1
should be performed first ;-)
I did not say that. With *ANY* release, testing should be done, if
possible.
I haven't been on the list in about a year due to other work load. I
now find the version of NBU we're running is only supported until
3/31/2008. We would like to upgrade to v6.5.1. Just checking for
opinions on that version.
Currently at v5.1 MP5 Solaris Master/Media, Win Media.
26 matches
Mail list logo
