[Veritas-bu] My Experiences with DataDomain Restorers

2008-11-11 Thread cantonelli
Hi Jamie, My Name is Chris Antonelli and I am part of the Support Team here at Data Domain. First, I want to thank you for all the positive feedback about the products at the top of the post... more importantly I am sorry to hear of your frustrations on the rest of the issues. Here are some da

Re: [Veritas-bu] My Experiences with DataDomain Restorers

2008-11-08 Thread Justin Piszcz
Eliza, Per DD's latest announcement they are replacing ALL mid-planes regardless of the datecode. Contact support. On Sat, 8 Nov 2008, Eliza Yam wrote: > > Jamie, > I can echo on your comments on Data Domain Restorers as we have used them for > a few years now. Thanks for the comprehensive a

Re: [Veritas-bu] My Experiences with DataDomain Restorers

2008-11-08 Thread Eliza Yam
Eliza Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 18:08:47 -0800From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [Veritas-bu] My Experiences with DataDomain Restorers I've been using DataDomain restorers, the 460 and 565 series for almost three years now and here's my opinion of them, go

[Veritas-bu] My Experiences with DataDomain Restorers

2008-11-07 Thread JAJA (Jamie Jamison)
I've been using DataDomain restorers, the 460 and 565 series for almost three years now and here's my opinion of them, good and bad. Good: DeDuplication - DataDomain's de-duplication claims are accurate and the deduplication performance is impressive. I'm seeing compression ratios of 4:1 (ORACL