] On Behalf Of David Stanaway
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 6:29 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
These number aren't that hot compared to DataDomain from my use of it.
We are seeing 86TB of backup images occupying 4.4TB of phys disk.
On 4/1/2010 12:07
2:00 PM
To: Chapman, Scott; David Stanaway; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Supposed to be available at end of the year in 7.1
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf
Of David
Stanaway
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 6:29 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
These number aren't that hot compared to DataDomain from my use of it.
We are seeing 86TB of backup images occupying 4.4TB of phys disk.
On 4/1/2010 12:07 PM, Jon
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
These number aren't that hot compared to DataDomain from my use of it.
We are seeing 86TB of backup images occupying 4.4TB of phys disk.
On 4/1/2010 12:07 PM, Jon Bousselot wrote:
I set it up in a small test environment, and started
Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com
To:
Chapman, Scott scott.chap...@icbc.com
Cc:
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date:
04/06/2010 12:03 PM
Subject:
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Sent by:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
I believe you are correct, I asked if it was possible to do
Date:
04/06/2010 12:03 PM
Subject:
Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Sent by:
veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
I believe you are correct, I asked if it was possible to do it with tape
(crazy!) idea but no response yet =) It looks like its limited to
Puredisk/NBU7 disk tool
...@stanaway.net; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
I believe you are correct, I asked if it was possible to do it with tape
(crazy!) idea but no response yet =) It looks like its limited to
Puredisk/NBU7 disk tool.
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Chapman, Scott wrote
*From:* Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com
*To:* veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
*Sent:* Thu, April 1, 2010 3:27:36 AM
*Subject:* [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Hi,
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 8:29 AM, David Stanaway da...@stanaway.net wrote:
These number aren't that hot compared to DataDomain from my use of it.
We are seeing 86TB of backup images occupying 4.4TB of phys disk.
It all depends on the data streams and how many generations you keep. If
you
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 9:41 AM
To: David Stanaway
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 8:29 AM, David Stanaway da...@stanaway.net
wrote
; David Stanaway
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Another thing to note as with many of these types of devices (VTL's,
intelligent disk, dedup applications, etc.) using OS specific tools such
as df to determine used space will not give accurate numbers
Hi,
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you seeing?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Hi,
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you seeing?
Justin.
___
Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu
Proud partner. Susan G. Komen
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote:
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you seeing?
This is completely dependent on the input data streams. We've got some data
sets that get great de-dupe and some that absolutely suck. We de-dupe our
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010, Ed Wilts wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.comwrote:
Is anyone using de-dupe?
What kind of savings are you seeing?
This is completely dependent on the input data streams. We've got some data
sets that get great de-dupe and
Thanks all, but I was specifically referring to the De-Duplication provided
by NBU7.
Same answer - it's essentially the PureDisk engine and it's going to depend
on the data stream. We use PureDisk. It's great for office documents and
lousy for TIFFs.
.../Ed
need to monitor its utilization
similar to how you would monitor basic disk or tape usage.
-Jon
From: Justin Piszcz jpis...@lucidpixels.com
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Thu, April 1, 2010 3:27:36 AM
Subject: [Veritas-bu] NBU7 / De-Dupe?
Hi
17 matches
Mail list logo
