>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:veritas-bu->[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>Curtis Preston
>Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 12:44 PM
>To: Jeff Lightner; VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup verify at write
Jeff Lightner said:
>FDA Validation requirements make S-OX look
>like a walk in the park.
What HE said!
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If
you have received this email i
park.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of spaldam
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 11:38 PM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup verify at write time
The best thing I can say is: "Make Multiple Copies"
The best thing I can say is: "Make Multiple Copies".
This is why I always make sure I have at least 2 copies of my next longest
retention before expiring the shorter retention(S).
For example:
If you do weekly full backups, keep you're daily incremental backups for at
least 2 weeks.
In turn,
EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.glasshouse.com
Infrastructure :: Optimized
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:18 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup verify at write t
PROTECTED] | www.glasshouse.com
Infrastructure :: Optimized
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Piszcz
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:18 AM
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup verify at write time
If you use bpverify
-bu] Netbackup verify at write time
How many folks use this? Is it intensive? What is the recommendation for
running this?
Thanks,
Frank
- Original Message
From: Jim H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:36:30 AM
Subject: [Veri
How many folks use this? Is it intensive? What is the recommendation for
running this?
Thanks,
Frank
- Original Message
From: Jim H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: VERITAS-BU@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 10:36:30 AM
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup verify at writ
If you use bpverify, it reads the media and compares the contents of the
media to the catalog.
It does not verify the data itself, only the contents of the catalog as
you said.
I have seen restores fail and bpverify says the tape is ok.
Justin.
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jim H wrote:
>
> If you us
If you use bpverify, it reads the media and compares the contents of the media
to the catalog.
It is faster than a restore but Ed is right, it will not tell you if you are
backing up the right things.
It should not be affected by changing files on the client though.
+-
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Markham
Sent: Wednesday, 23 July 2008 8:45 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup verify at write time
Guys management here are fussing around how are we sure backups are successful
or they can be restored from without doi
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 5:44 AM, Dave Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Guys management here are fussing around how are we sure backups are
> successful or they can be restored from without doing an actual restore.
There is no sure fire way.
> I know the only sure fire way of knowing a back
Guys management here are fussing around how are we sure backups are
successful or they can be restored from without doing an actual restore.
I was under the impressions that some sort of verify or sum check
operation was done at write time and that if a status 0 was returned it
was a pretty goo
13 matches
Mail list logo
