, February 15, 2011 5:40 PM
To: Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
I don't buy that rational. How often do you think you are going to turn over
an appliance? It is more likely you will add to the pool of appliances. I
know we
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sesar,
Steven L.
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:13 PM
To: Marelas, Peter; Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
Most firms
PureDisk is def cheaper up front. However, dedupe rates and ingest performance
are no where near what a DD box can do.
Factor in also, if you did you Older, servers, what is the 3,4, and 5 yr
maintenance costs on that, for those servers? Not to mention the storage.
IMO, while a higher up
When I looked at these options a couple of years ago a key difference that
mattered to us was that the PureDisk appliance was not 'owned' by any NetBackup
domain. That meant several domains can use the same appliance, and so e.g. to
replicate both ways between 2 DCs a pair of appliances was
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M 77fre...@gmail.com wrote:
My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
de-duplication.
One of the selling advantages of the PureDisk appliances is that you only
buy the de-dupe licenses once. All hardware eventually gets old. When
.
-Jonathan
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 11:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 3:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M
77fre...@gmail.commailto:77fre...@gmail.com wrote:
My
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
We use both here and have been for over 4 years. We use Data Domain
for all of our data center backups and Puredisk (the original appliance based
version) for all
: +1.304.554.6039
Cell: +1.412.805.5313
From: Pat McDonald pat_mcdon...@symantec.com
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: Pat McDonald pat_mcdon...@symantec.com
Date: 02/14/2011 10:52 AM
Subject:Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
Sent by:veritas-bu-boun
-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Fred M
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:14 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
Hi all,
My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk
Hi all,
My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
de-duplication. While I can setup a demo of each and get the numbers, and
ask the sales guys what makes them great and why their competitors aren't, I
can't trust that is nothing more than sales drivel. So, I ask you expert
11 matches
Mail list logo
