] On Behalf Of
Lightner, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:25 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question for NetBackup 7.0 Dedup userORData
Domain users
On the flip side because things like NetBackup do the work on the system
being backed up it increases CPU resource
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of
Lightner, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 8:25 AM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question for NetBackup 7.0 Dedup userORData
Domain users
On the flip side because things like NetBackup do
...@kforce.com; veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Question for NetBackup 7.0 Dedup userORData Domain
users
Using the ddboost ost plugin from Data Domain in conjunction with Netbackup
moves the metabase comparisons from the data domain appliance to the media
server
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: RE: [Veritas-bu] Question for NetBackup 7.0 Dedup userORData Domain
users
I've just recently had a meeting with my Symantec rep, and we were led to
believe that license cost and replication were NetBackup advantages. For
example, I was under the impression that if you backed up
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Martin, Jonathan jmart...@intersil.comwrote:
I've just recently had a meeting with my Symantec rep, and we were led to
believe that license cost and replication were NetBackup advantages. For
example, I was under the impression that if you backed up 10TB of
...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
08/25/2010 07:48 AM
To
Lightner, Jeff jlight...@water.com,
veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
cc
Subject
Re: [Veritas-bu] Question for NetBackup 7.0 Dedup userORDataDomain
users
Both use block level, but DD is a variable block whereas NetBackup is a
fixed block size
